The 2022 Grammys got even lower ratings than last week’s terrible Oscars

The dire 2022 Oscars were still watched by more people than the moderately fun 2022 Grammys

Aux News Oscars
The 2022 Grammys got even lower ratings than last week’s terrible Oscars
Jon Batiste at the 2022 Grammys Photo: Emma McIntyre/Getty Images for The Recording Academy

Last night’s Grammy Awards ceremony was relatively fun, provided you like to see musicians performing their hit songs and don’t give a damn about the actual presentation of awards (70 or so were given out in a pre-show event, leaving only about 10 for the show itself), and also assuming you don’t think it invalidates the entire Grammys organization to occasionally give trophies to people like Louis C.K., but if you can get past those hurdles: Relative fun awaits!

But not even relative fun is enough for the Grammy Awards to make a sizable dent in the cultural consciousness, with last night’s show only getting slightly better ratings than the all-time low record of last year’s ceremony. This comes from Variety, which explains that the somewhat remote 2021 Grammys got about 9.4 million viewers, depending on which metrics you trust, and this year’s show got about 9.6 million. On the one hand, it’s an improvement! On the other hand, it’s barely an improvement. By contrast, the 2020 Grammys, which were held in January of that year when everyone was still happy, got 18.8 million.

That 9.6 million is still lower than the all-time low record for the Oscars, though, which came from its 2021 ceremony as well. The 2022 Oscars last week got about 13.7 million viewers, and those were the second-lowest ratings the Oscars have ever gotten, but that doom and gloom is still better than what the Grammys have been doing the last couple of years.

We noted when the Oscar ratings came out that dramatic, controversial ceremonies don’t necessarily translate to good ratings the next year, but it doesn’t seem strange to think that maybe a straightforward, mostly inoffensive ceremony like last night’s Grammys might convince more people to tune in next year. If the Oscars have a history of being a shitshow, and the Grammys have a history of being a pretty good time, maybe there will be a shift at some point where Music’s Biggest Night becomes more of a cultural event than the Oscars… but only in the sense that nobody is watching either of them anymore.

6 Comments

  • buckfay-av says:

    I don’t think I have ever watched a single moment of them. I know few people who do. When it finds Justin Bieber, Louis C. K., Kanye, and the like worthy of awards, it pretty well announces it is utter crap.

  • yellowfoot-av says:

    Do you think that at some point in the future, the people in charge of awards shows will realize that the main appeal of them was the glitz and glamour of industries that in the past decade have been almost entirely demystified by modern society? When you can see Chris Evan’s dick on Twitter, it makes the mere 12 hours per year that used to be reserved for regular folk to be able to see celebrities talking to each other seem a bit humdrum.

  • dudebraa-av says:

    Guess people aren’t that into watching millionaires get trophies anymore. 

  • lotionchowdr-av says:

    THAT’S BECAUSE NO ONE CARES ABOUT RICH PEOPLE GIVING EACH OTHER TROPHIES

  • sybann-av says:

    Awards shows are fucking DULL. I can see the fashion the next day in here. And have whatever did happen flogged to DEATH. Who needs to watch?

  • kasley42-av says:

    “…last night’s Grammys might convince more people to tune in next year…”Yup.  Good chance of this. Slick performances with excellent camera works, music (of course) lighting, and choreography. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin