C

Blindingly obvious subtext dims the scares of blackout horror movie The Power

Film Reviews Blackout
Blindingly obvious subtext dims the scares of blackout horror movie The Power
The Power Photo: Shudder

Moralism and horror have always gone hand in hand, but the recent trend toward ostensibly scary movies that clonk you upside the head with their message has led to a global gooseflesh shortage. Set in January 1974, when labor disputes saw England mandate blackouts in order to conserve electricity, The Power isn’t “merely” about how terrifying it can be when the power goes off. It’s also—much more emphatically—about the ways that power can be abused by seemingly benign authority figures. While that’s not an inherently terrible idea, first-time writer-director Corinna Faith seems to have reverse-engineered her narrative from her title’s cutesy double meaning. The movie’s period spookiness and its #MeToo outrage have virtually nothing to do each with other, diminishing the efficacy of both and making it feel like a tract.

They theoretically connect through Val (Rose Williams), a young woman who’s first seen awakening from a nightmare and switching on every light in her flat. Fear of the dark makes her the worst possible nurse to be placed on the graveyard shift during a blackout, especially considering that it’s her very first day—and night, as it turns out—on the job. Still, she’s alone only in her particular wing. Other nurses are on hand, one of whom (Emma Rigby) chances to be an old school acquaintance of Val’s, conveniently prepared to make constant, vague allusions to some episode in which Val apparently brought what are widely believed to be false charges of sexual assault against someone. Another nurse (Nuala McGowan) passes the long, lonely hours reading a first edition of Stephen King’s Carrie (a slight cheat, as the book wasn’t published until three months later), approvingly telling Val that it’s about “a girly [who] has enough and brings the whole place down.” Things will be set on fire in this hospital, too, before the night is over.

Who’s had enough, though? Faith isn’t inclined to leave the question ambiguous, though she does at least defer explanation until the film’s second half, throwing in some red herrings along the way. The Power is strongest early on, when it consists largely of Val looking petrified while wandering dark corridors with a lantern, throwing menacing shadows on the walls. (In reality, as you’d expect, hospitals were exempt from the blackouts.) Occasional flashes of discordant imagery suggest that there’s more going on than we’re actually seeing, and it’s briefly disturbingly unclear whether the malevolent force at work perceives Val as a potential victim or an unwitting vessel. Unfortunately, it all gets laboriously spelled out, complete with the true, corporeal villain helpfully telling Val, “I don’t have to listen to you. I have the power here.” Faith finds a way to stage this final confrontation in an underlit room, but by that point the blackout is over and the film’s conceit has long since become irrelevant. It was sufficient for Poltergeist to reveal that the house was illegally built over a cemetery; one particular restless spirit conveying its grim backstory, via possession’s equivalent of charades, would have made that movie more pointed but much less frightening.

12 Comments

  • bensavagegarden-av says:

    Considering this site generally values a piece of work having the right political message over any other criteria, to the point that you once lowered the grade on a documentary specifically because it was apolitical, I can only imagine how thick this movie must lay it on for even the AV Club to think it’s a bit much.

    • freeman333js-av says:

      Considering how often I see that complaint repeated—”AV Club only cares about politics, not how good the movie actually is!”—as soon as I saw this review was less-than-favorable despite the theoretically progressive messaging, I immediately wondered how all the self-appointed movie-review-reviewers would contort themselves to avoid acknowledging any challenges to that belief.  Looks like I’ve got my answer.

  • rachelmontalvo-av says:

    They could have been reading ‘Salem’s Lot’. “ Hey Nurse, who’s at the window? “

  • apathymonger1-av says:

    Slightly confusing that we’re getting a TV series and movie called “The Power” in the same year. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10369484/referencePlus all those spin-offs of the TV series “Power.”

  • popculturesurvivor-av says:

    Bum bum, bum bum bum bum, bum bum bum bum, bum bum bum bum, I GOT….

  • theunnumberedone-av says:

    They chose to set it during these specific historical blackouts, but they didn’t bother to consider the fact that hospitals have had backup generators since a year I don’t feel like looking up but is definitely earlier than the 70s? Christ.

  • teenagemutantkinjawarrior-av says:

    It’s awfully rich for an AV Club writer to object to titles having “cutesy double meanings.”Speaking of the glaringly obvious, you know that you’re reading a bad faith review when you get to the part where the triggered male reviewer dismissively and condescendingly cites “#MeToo outrage.”

  • ajaxjs-av says:

    This is what happens when checking off enough Twitter hashtags becomes more important than a meaningful narrative.

  • richarddawsonsghost-av says:
  • wakemein2024-av says:

    So this isn’t about the lyrical Jesse James?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin