Chasing Barbara Loden and the broken, beer-soaked soul of Wanda

Film Features For Our Consideration

Born either in 1932 or 1934, depending on who’s asking, and dead by 1980, Barbara Loden was a brief glimmer in the eye of cinema history, a fleeting mirage that vanishes as soon as it appears on the edge of your peripheral vision. A North Carolina native who spent the last decade of her life trying to prove, to herself as well as the world, that she was more than the empty-headed blond object she’d spent her formative years performing as an actress and a model, Loden had resources and connections that most women would kill for. She was a Tony Award winner married to a famous film director, with the time and money to pursue her artistic dreams. When she set out on her own and realized one of those dreams, the resulting film was celebrated by critics and screened in theaters and at festivals around the world. And yet, and yet, she never made another film.

That leaves Wanda (1971) as Loden’s sole epigraph as a brilliant writer and an uncommonly empathetic director, a sad fact made even more poignant by the fact that, until recently, it was almost impossible to find. I first encountered Wanda last year, as a print of the UCLA Film And Television Archive’s restoration of the film toured a handful of arthouse theaters scattered across North America. Those who saw it called it a revelation, but in the end, its theatrical revival proved just as ephemeral as its initial run. Now, however, Loden gets a real shot at artistic immortality as Wanda is enshrined in the Criterion Collection’s well-respected, and wide-reaching, catalog of world cinema.

And Wanda is no footnote. It’s a landmark work that heralded not only a new generation of women filmmakers, but also the independent film movement that would follow in its wake. In 1970, the exercise was absurd: Not only were female auteurs dismissed and condescended to by the artistic establishment, but the idea of making a largely improvised film with a budget of $100,000 ($651,400 in today’s money), a crew of three, and a cast composed mostly of non-actors would have been preposterous even coming from a Great Man of Cinema in those dying days of the old studio system. Nevertheless, inspired by the radical methods of the French New Wave—a movement whose free spirit is evident in the film’s unorthodox “lovers on the run” romance—Loden set out for Pennsylvania coal country with a cameraman and a sound mixer, cobbling her vision together with the help of found locations and ads in local newspapers calling for extras.

Wanda was very important to Loden, who later said in interviews that the film was semi-autobiographical, an attempt to work through her feelings about the coping mechanisms she had adopted in her youth. “She’s very much the way I used to be, just kind of floats around and doesn’t know what to do with herself,” she told Dick Cavett on his talk show in 1971. It’s an assertion backed by her cameraman and editor, Nicholas T. Proferes, who characterized the process of assembling a rough cut of the film as very “personal” and “private” for Loden in the 1991 documentary I Am Wanda. (Both the documentary and Loden’s Dick Cavett appearance are extras on Criterion’s Blu-ray.) Putting this private, painful part of herself on screen gave Loden the confidence to define herself on her own terms, rather than those dictated to her by men. When introduced by Cavett as “the attractive and very determined Barbara Loden,” she replied, in a soft, melodic voice with just a hint of a Southern accent, “Very determined, huh?” She had come to expect the “attractive” bit, and the condescension it implied.

Wanda is an episodic film, slow and quiet, especially by today’s standards. Loden was fascinated by women who abandon their husbands and families, and when we meet Wanda (Loden) at the beginning of the film, she’s hungover on another family’s couch, rubbing her aching head as a baby cries in the next room. Wanda does not pick it up. Instead, she rubs the sleep from her eyes, puts curlers in her hair, and sets off across an open wound of a coal field hoping to bum a few bucks from a weather-beaten old man whose rambling stories she politely tolerates as he peels a couple of dollars off of a roll in his pocket. Still wearing her curlers—along with her boxy white handbag, her last symbolic vestiges of performative womanhood—she takes a bus to a building we later learn is a courthouse. She lingers outside, then walks in as her soon-to-be-ex-husband complains to a judge that Wanda doesn’t cook, she doesn’t clean, she neglects her children, she’s a failure as a wife and as a woman. “Just give it to him,” she tells the judge, looking down at the floor, unable to articulate what it is that’s paralyzing her.

Divorce granted, Wanda heads to a garment factory churning out plain knit striped dresses. There, the supervisor tells her he can’t give her any more work, because she sews too slow compared to the other workers. She’s of no use to capitalism either. The only thing the world values Wanda for is her body, and she obliges, passively accepting a drink—then a ride, then a motel room—from any man who offers it to her until she unwittingly stumbles into a robbery in progress. Frustrated and confounded by the apathetic woman in front of him, the robber, Norman Dennis (Michael Higgins), grabs Wanda by the arm and drags her out to the car. Is she his captive? His partner in crime? An unwitting bystander? Even they don’t seem to know. But for all his gruffness, “Mr. Dennis,” as Wanda calls him, doesn’t look straight through Wanda like most people do. And so they drive off together, on to the next robbery.

Its heroine’s passivity made Wanda a lightning rod for feminist critics at the time, who argued that Wanda had no agency, and was not a good role model for women. (Pauline Kael bluntly called the character a “slut.”) And it’s true that Wanda spends the film drifting from place to place and man to man in search of little more than a place to sleep and enough beer to drown her thoughts for the evening. But the pain behind her passivity, and the way that she embodies both a “good” (quiet, obedient) and a “bad” (irresponsible, sexual) woman at the same time, hint at a deeper and more poignant statement on the lasting effects of misogynist oppression on the human psyche. Wanda’s thousand-yard stare speaks of abandoned dreams, a broken spirit, a woman who can no longer remember what it’s like to feel anything, let alone to feel happy. It’s the resigned limpness of a woman who submits to her attacker in order to survive.

How many women have been so broken on the wheel of history? How many Wandas are there, scattered around the barrooms and backseats of the world? Faint echoes of her appear in characters like Roma’s Cleo (Yalitza Aparicio), watching stoically as the father of her child drives away in a truck full of hooting, carefree soccer players. There’s also a glimmer of her in Disobedience’s Esti Kuperman (Rachel McAdams), silently submitting to a patriarchal power structure that seeks to negate her existence as a lesbian woman. And Wanda’s creator also has her heirs: Greta Gerwig and Sarah Polley are Barbara Loden’s spiritual daughters, as is Debra Granik, who shares Loden’s affection for working-class stories. For its creator, Wanda was an act of self-definition, a chance to exorcise the ghosts of her past and re-create herself as an artist. Little did she know that by blazing such a trail for herself, she also cleared the way for those who followed.

Wanda is out on Blu-ray now via the Criterion Collection, and will stream on The Criterion Channel when it launches on April 8.

10 Comments

  • boggardlurch-av says:

    I would question the characterization and seeming implication that “Wanda” is the inspiration for the wave of feminist cinema, rather than drawing from the same well and reaching the director’s own conclusions.If the film aired once and was never seen again (and indeed apparently existed as an ephemeral possibly-imagined unicorn of cinema for decades), it’s hard to argue for actual direct influence of contemporaries.

    • vadasz-av says:

      It’s “an” inspiration, rather than “the” inspiration, and an important one. Yes, the film had a short theatrical run in the US, but it was also released throughout Europe, including at the Venice and Cannes film festivals. And it’s the sort of film that film people could get if they wanted to see it. John Waters has loved the film for a long time, talked it up, showed it to people, as one example. And the French DVD (produced in part by Isabelle Hupert, another of the film’s admirers) has been out since 2004 (granted, it’s been super expensive – I think I paid 60 bucks for it about 7-8 years ago).Kelly Reichardt’s been a long-time champion of the film; it’s hard to watch her work and not see Wanda flittering through it. With all that in mind, it’s not really difficult to see how independent female filmmakers, starting, at least, in the ‘80s and definitely since 2000, have been influenced by this film.

      • boggardlurch-av says:

        The write up made it seem like Manos: Hands of Fate had a broader run – thus my confusion. You at bare minimum need to see a movie to tell someone else about it so they can be influenced, and it did not sound like this had the initial reach to be a primary influence at the time.

  • mooseheadu-av says:

    How many women have been so broken on the wheel of history? How many
    Wandas are there, scattered around the barrooms and backseats of the
    world?

    Legion. 🙁

    • fatcastor-av says:

      Within a few moments spent on any form of social media, we are confronted with an innumerable number of unsettlingly young women whose lives seem destined to eventually succumb to this sad narrative. The “agency-less passive bimbo”, who implicitly understands that she is “of no use to capitalism” until she commodifies her body, with an “apathy that is confounding”, is alive and well. This generation has even coined a word for it via Instagram: “thirst trap”. Why do young women so powerfully continue to believe and whole-heartedly throw themselves into the sexpot/passive heroine narrative, and believe that somehow yielding by reducing her self to “tit and ass shots” on social media, rather than truly advancing her place in the world and pursuing roles still largely inaccessible to women in the corporate and political sphere —- is somehow “empowering”?“How many women have been so broken on the wheel of history?
      How many ‘Wandas’ are there, scattered around the barrooms and backseats of the
      world?”Their number is LEGION, but they are not only “scattered around barrooms and backseats” — these women are everywhere, and are now reborn, inhabiting a brand new, feckless generation who clearly did not learn from the missteps of the prior.

  • rregan-av says:

    Nice write-up. It’s funny to hear how poorly Wanda is received as just another in a long line of agency-less passive bimbos, when the movie really feels like Loden challenges the misogynist’s feminine ideal with naked abandon. “This? This is what you want? Cause this is what you’ve been depicting the whole time”

  • dogme-av says:

    Great movie. I think the most chilling scene is when Mr. Dennis slaps her, and she just keeps on talking.Ran on TCM the day it was inducted into the National Film Registry.

  • dollymix-av says:

    I’ll give a recommendation to the novella/essay “Suite for Barbara Loden”, by Nathalie Leger, published by the excellent Dorothy Project, which recaps the film while also talking about the author’s relationship with it and speculating about Loden herself.I’ll be honest, I was a little underwhelmed when I saw the film, but it’s unusual and evocative enough to be worth seeing.

  • vadasz-av says:

    This is a fantastic film, and a great write-up, Katie. For such a “slow” film, there’s a ton going on – reading its delicate balance of passivity and irresponsibility along with Loden and Proferes’s really thoughtful camera work makes the film immensely re-watchable. If it doesn’t strike you on first viewing, I’d highly recommend giving it a bit of time then watching again.Wanda along with the 70s work of Elaine May, Stephanie Rothman, Joan Micklin Silver, and others make great, necessary additions to, but also counters to, the dominant narrative of a macho New Hollywood.

  • kevinj68-av says:

    There are a
    few films whose endings left me with a profound feeling of loneliness. This is
    one, Days of Heaven, Salaam Bombay, The Grifters, Raise the Red Lantern are a
    few others.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin