Year-end roundtable: On Disney’s 100th anniversary, what succeeded?

2023 should have been a celebration for Disney, but it didn't quite work out that way

Aux Features Disney
Year-end roundtable: On Disney’s 100th anniversary, what succeeded?
From left to right: Wish, The Little Mermaid, Elemental, Ant-Man And The Wasp: Quantumania Screenshot: Disney

In a series of special year-end roundtable discussions, The A.V. Club looks back at the stories that made the biggest impact on pop culture in 2023.

Is Disney still the happiest place on Earth? Maybe not. Recent original animated films like Wish and Elemental (remember Elemental?) have flopped both critically and at the box office, while the studio’s endless slog of live-action remakes has been increasingly mired by mean-spirited controversy. This year, both The Little Mermaid’s Halle Bailey and Snow White’s Rachel Zegler have had to contend with nasty, racist backlash to their respective castings, all over a film that ended up being pretty mediocre in the first place. (At least in Bailey’s case, that is; Zegler’s Snow White has been pushed to 2025.)

None of that is to mention the increasing pandemonium over at Marvel Studios, as years of convoluted plot lines, diminishing quality, and growing franchise fatigue have begun to spell trouble for the MCU at the box office.

Can good old Sailor Mickey right the ship or is Disney doomed to sink forever? Here, A.V. Club staffers Saloni Gajjar, Drew Gillis, and Emma Keates discuss whether a little pixie dust will be enough to fix the studio’s many grievances.


Drew Gillis: This year started with Disney celebrating its 100-year anniversary. Did you have any expectations for the studio and the brand this year? For me, they’ve generally always been pretty solid, so I just expected another solid year.

Saloni Gajjar: I’m not a huge Disney person anymore, so I don’t end up watching everything they release. Still, I kind of assumed it would be a landmark time in terms of movies and TV shows because of the 100-year anniversary. Again, I haven’t seen all of 2023's slate, so I don’t know if they resonated or hit hard. What I will say as an outsider of sorts is it was interesting to witness them adapting to the times with some live-action adaptations and the annoying/fascinating discourse that followed.

I am, however, a Marvel person. And I can confirm almost all of it was a letdown except Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 3.

Emma Keates: I guess I didn’t have any new expectations for Disney because expectations were so high already. When Disney announces a new project like Wish or even this year’s beleaguered Haunted Mansion adaptation, I still tend to have a general assumption of quality just based on their past output. But as the studio turned out flop after flop this year, those expectations started to wear away.

SG: The year definitely started on a high note because from January onwards, everyone was eagerly celebrating and anticipating their films. But I do feel like the general excitement faded away with each passing project.

EK: I have also literally never been excited about one of their live-action remakes, so as long as those remain the buzzy releases of the year every year it will be harder and harder to really engage. Halle Bailey did sound amazing in The Little Mermaid though, that’s a non-negotiable.

DG: Just to get it out of the way early, we’re all childless adults, so I don’t think any of us are seeking out every Disney movie unless it’s our job to cover them or unless there is some big success that everyone’s talking about. And in recent years, there have been plenty of the latter—Coco comes to mind as something that was frequently recommended to me by adults. But this year’s Pixar offering—Elemental—feels already forgotten, even as an underperforming punching bag. As soon as Wish opened, that became the punching bag and hardly anyone mentioned Elemental. The fact that there even is a punching bag is a tide-shift for Disney. It feels like a lot of people are kind of openly rooting for them to fail. Maybe it’s the fact that they’re a monopoly that uses its power to just pump out live-action remakes of things we loved as kids. Who’s to say!?

EK: Wow, that’s completely right, Drew. I completely forgot Elemental existed, much less came out this year. Even the live-action remakes themselves have a shorter and shorter shelf life nowadays. Did anyone actually watch Peter Pan & Wendy?

DG: Frankly I already forgot about that one too.

SG: You make a good point, Drew. I do end up confidently seeking out stuff like Encanto and Turning Red and Raya And The Last Dragon, all of which I loved. That’s probably because it’s buzzy and people in our industry are covering/praising it—I trust their recommendations. From what I saw, there wasn’t a similar conversation around Elemental and nothing about Wish felt like I wanted to see it. Ditto, re: Peter Pan & Wendy or this year’s holiday film, Dashing Through The Snow (which I didn’t know already came out until I looked it up to confirm). These are already erased from our collective memories. It’s also because the focus is on stuff like Little Mermaid, even if it’s getting attention for the wrong reasons when it comes to how Halle Bailey was treated.

The Little Mermaid | Official Trailer

EK: That’s a great point re: The Little Mermaid, Saloni. I ended up really rooting for it in a more abstract sense because I love Halle Bailey and was so angry about the way she was treated, but that didn’t end up translating into real interest in the movie itself. For that, Disney has to find a way to recommit to actually putting out original stories that don’t feel rushed or slapped together like this year’s offerings did.

DG: The Little Mermaid is such a bummer because that was the first remake that I was kind of excited about when they announced it. I had been a fan of Bailey before she was cast but knowing how it turned out and all the bullshit she got saddled with, I wish it hadn’t happened. First it was the racist backlash—which she seemed to be left to deal with on her own, at least publicly—and then it was for a film that looked bad and ended up getting roasted for the visual effects. It underperformed because how wouldn’t it, and then it just leaves the worst people in the world to blame it on the casting of a Black woman and some “go woke go broke” nonsense. It already feels like the same thing is happening with the upcoming Rachel Zegler-led Snow White remake too. I’m sure the actors are getting paid well, but good lord, it’s impossible to root for a studio when this stuff is going on.

EK: It’s just a really upsetting lose-lose situation all around. And all for something that simply has no real business existing in the first place.

SG: I also think a studio as massive as Disney isn’t doing enough to support the actors who are getting harassed for no damn reason. So casting them isn’t enough without aiding them in other ways, but maybe that’s pulling on a thread that we could keep talking about for a while.

And yes, I remember when Little Mermaid’s trailer dropped, everyone obviously made fun of the visuals. Even that fake Flounder photo emerged, some people kinda believed it was from the film. Is it because we have little faith in their VFX and movies overall today? Or was it the preconceived “This is going to suck” because, of course, we know Pixar and Disney do generally excel in animation?

DG: I mean there was The Lion King in 2019, which proved that we don’t watch these movies for realism. It’s about a singing lion—it doesn’t need to look like Planet Earth. Awkwafina as a rapping seagull doesn’t need to look like a real seagull. In fact, it just makes it all the more upsetting.

SG: Exactly.

EK: To Saloni’s point, I think it’s a little bit of both. I feel similarly about the backlash to Chris Pine’s villain song in Wish (which sounds so much like Imagine Dragons or shopping at the grocery store) because we all know what they’re capable of in that capacity. “Be Prepared” is an all-timer! But just that one little clip was enough for me to know I would probably never watch the full movie unless I needed to for work. It’s just such a bummer to watch a mediocre Disney film and think about what’s been lost over the years.

DG: It’s certainly one of those things that’s hard to look at completely objectively, because obviously everyone our age has good nostalgic feelings about the ’90s Disney movies and their music but it’s pretty clear the creative pedigree has changed. Little Mermaid has music from Broadway composers Howard Ashman and Alan Menken; Wish has music written by Julia Michaels. And I’m not putting her down as a songwriter, but would you rather have music in a Disney movie that sounds like Little Shop Of Horrors or a Selena Gomez ballad?

I think there’s a bit of trying to be all things for all people. Some Disney songs do cross over to mainstream hits, sure, but it’s not because they were written as pop songs. Even when Frozen came out, they had Demi Lovato record a poppier cover of “Let It Go” to send to radio stations, only for the Idina Menzel original to outperform it.

I now cede my music student soap box, ha.

SG: No it’s compelling because when you put it like that, it helps shape it in perspective outside of just 2023, too, right? Like how has Disney’s approach evolved over the years such that this is where they’ve ended the year? And it’s not just any year.

EK: That’s such a great point. I do think it’s kind of a classic case of misunderstanding what aspects of beloved songs or movies made them popular in the first place. To go back to the Lion King example, people loved the original movie for its great music and powerful emotions, not because it taught us anything real about life on the savanna.

DG: It’s genuinely kind of wild to look back on that ’90s Disney Renaissance era and think about some of the swings they were taking. Like Hunchback Of Notre Dame? Do you think they would take that kind of swing today? And yeah, it would be risky, and it probably turned off some audiences. And yeah, it only grossed $325 million worldwide—which would be about twice that now. It was the fifth highest-grossing movie of 1996! The studio used to take things resembling risks and was often rewarded for them—if they could back it up with the quality of the product. They’d rather do a safe product now, even if no one is interested in it.

EK: I totally agree, Drew. Marvel’s diminishing returns also really illustrate that mindset. Even Disney CEO Bob Iger knows that the MCU’s output has been kind of lousy recently, but they still keep churning them out!

The Marvels | Final Trailer | In Theaters Friday

SG: Is it safe to say Disney isn’t taking risks as a company and would rather play it safe to avoid scandal? They don’t seem to escape that anyway, whether it’s Little Mermaid or endless poor MCU content or all the Daredevil: Born Again drama or even Bog Iger pushing Nia DaCosta under the bus for The Marvels. The product itself isn’t what people are talking about, whether good or bad, but it’s the issues surrounding it.

DG: I feel like playing it safe reads as a safe investment, but it’s clear that audiences are growing tired of it, based, at least, on The Marvels’ box office. I think part of the issue with the MCU is they have things planned years in advance, so they can’t really course-correct very quickly. The attempts to right the path are quick reshoots and shoddy last-minute VFX, a la Quantumania, which has the opposite effect of endearing new people.

SG: Just the memory of watching Quantamania in the theater makes my eyes gloss over. It gave me such a headache. Not relevant, I know, but needed to vent.

DG: It is relevant because you’re the most invested out of the three of us, so if they lost you, they certainly lost a lot of people.

SG: They applied the same formula to their TV shows, rushing them out to fill an almost made-up quote, hampering the quality in return.

EK: For my part, as someone who was pretty invested in the original Avengers saga, one of the things I appreciated was that I could totally understand and enjoy Endgame without watching every single film/TV show/commercial tie-ins, etc. There are so many callbacks that that’s impossible now, and it’s hard to imagine any new fans climbing aboard or returning once they’ve been alienated.

SG: At least if there’s one thing Disney/Iger have learned this year, it’s to not go insane with how much MCU stuff they’re throwing out.

DG: I think that’s an interesting tie-in to some of the disappointment toward Wish as well, which tried to tie its ending into everything else in the greater Disney canon. They had so much success with the multiverse and the almost serialized narrative of the original Avengers saga that now there seems to be an idea that everything needs to be like that. And it’s just interesting how much priorities have changed. Remember when movies would go into the “Disney vault” and the scarcity made them more valuable? Imagine how successful an MCU movie would be if they just took, like, a year off.

SG: The anticipation alone would help, yeah.

EK: That’s especially frustrating about Wish because Disney has always put little easter eggs in their movies, but until recently they were just that: easter eggs. If you noticed that Rapunzel from Tangled attended Elsa’s coronation from Frozen for a split second, good for you! It was a fun puzzle, but those moments weren’t expected to have any real impact on the actual story of the film. It’s so much more headache-inducing when every single plot point has to affect everything else. Sometimes things can just be fun!

DG: Exactly Emma! I was thinking about how there’s a Buzz Lightyear toy in the dentist’s office in Finding Nemo. I think part of it was internet detectives reading way too much into it and dubbing it a shared universe, but Disney is running the bit into the ground.

SG: That’s an amazing detail and one I forgot about completely.

EK: That “Pixar theory” video really did change so many lives (derogatory).

DG: Let’s end on a more positive note, I guess—what was good this year? Are there any projects in the pipeline you’re looking forward to, even if it’s cautious optimism?

EK: MAJOR emphasis on the word “cautious” but I am hopeful about Inside Out 2. While I’d prefer to get excited about high-quality original content, the first Inside Out movie is a classic for a reason and the conceit does leave a lot of room for an interesting and hopefully smart follow-up, as Riley gets older and experiences new challenges. Plus, Pixar at least used to really know how to churn out a good sequel. Toy Story 2, anyone?

DG: I’d concur on that point, and I can’t really think of anything else I’m more interested in than that, ha.

SG: Yeah, same for me. Inside Out was so lovely, I hope the sequel can remain as inventive & heartwarming. I don’t know if excited is the right word, but I am looking forward to Deadpool 3.

43 Comments

  • killa-k-av says:

    Disney could try treating its employees better and see if that results in higher quality work. A wild concept, I know.

    • mckludge-av says:

      Disney treats their employees a whole lot better than most large corporations.

      • killa-k-av says:

        Oh that’s right. I forgot that the writers and actors that went on strike aren’t technically “employees.”

        • mckludge-av says:

          Fair enough, but that’s not unique to Disney. I guess I was only considering what Disney calls “cast members,” which would be the everyday part and full time employees.. This would include those who perform, like the costumed characters and show members (parades, etc.) at the parks, who I think are union.

          • killa-k-av says:

            I’ll just say that from my perspective, I’m commenting on an article *about* Disney and their lousy 2023 – their film and TV productions in particular. If we were to get down into the nitty gritty, most Disney movies and TV shows are not made by full-time Disney employees. Everyone from production assistants to the department heads, and even the above-the-line crew are essentially contract workers. So me suggesting that if they were to treat their employees better, then their movies and shows might be better is not in any way a suggestion that they are “unique” in how they treat their employees. It’s literally the topic at hand (the parks aren’t even mentioned). But if you prefer, I can refer to them as Disney’s workers.And it’s not just the writers and actors that had a problem this year (obviously, their grievances were not solely aimed at Disney; though Disney CEO Bob Iger sure inserted himself into the conversation as much as possible). VFX workers, particularly the ones that work on Marvel Studio productions, which is owned by Disney, also repeatedly voiced their frustration with working conditions that they say are only possible because *Disney* throws around their weight in the industry to get their way for as much as they feeling like paying.Workers are increasingly being asked to do more with less to appease shareholders and play M&A chess. **This** isn’t unique to Disney either, but I hate it and I will call them and WB out every chance I get.

          • simplepoopshoe-av says:

            Oh I thought it was just the one comment, I didn’t realize you shit the bed over this entire comments section. I’m gonna go read something else.

        • simplepoopshoe-av says:

          Going on strike doesn’t immediately mean they were mistreated dude. They re-evaluated their situation. What a simple way of thinking my guy.

          • killa-k-av says:

            Where did I say they were “mistreated”? Of course they “re-evaluated” their situation, you fucking idiot. That’s the entire goddamn point of a strike.

        • simplepoopshoe-av says:

          Do you think that when they went back to work after the strike ended they were like “haha boss I still hate you!”. Like… think it out man….. they returned to their jobs after the strike was negiotiated…. I’m sorry I’m at a loss as to how to explain this to you but you’re wrong.
          They WENT BACK TO THEIR JOBS after the strike ended…. if they were being ‘mistreated’ why would they return? You’re an idiot.

          • killa-k-av says:

            You’ve just described every strike ever. Were you actually affected by the strikes in any tangible way? Maybe shut the fuck up about things you have no idea about and no fucking skin in, you stupid prick.

      • simplepoopshoe-av says:

        Yah but I’m gonna say they treat their employees better (they told me) and because I said it therefore it is true.

    • cinecraf-av says:

      Hey everybody, I found the commie!

  • nx-1700-av says:

    100 year celebration of the biggest entertainment company on the planet ,and no History specials about the start of the company ?Seems like they don’t want to mention except in passing …

  • universalamander-av says:
  • marshalgrover-av says:

    “Once Upon a Studio” is probably the only anniversary thing that didn’t fail.

  • thegobhoblin-av says:

    I thought we’d at least get some of the classic animated films re-released in theaters. How can you be a media conglomerate and not play the hits when you hit 100?

  • torchbearer2-av says:

    It was a mid celebration at best. It was already off to a bad start when the signage had history and quotes wrong, then having it butt up against the WDW 50th, even using similar colors. The customers seemed to be somewhere between fatigued from the celebrations being back to back and a lack of clarity which “100″ this was supposed to be. The entertainment was normal for a year but I think the company was expecting people to suddenly have increased interest in all of it because it was the 2nd or 3rd 100 years thing they have done. Other media companies usually just do a variant logo for trailers and have a cake rather than try to have activations across all their synergy machines. And now I just realized the next “Disney 100″ thing is probably going to happen soon since it will be Mickey’s 100th, then jump ahead to 55 and it will be Disney Parks 100.

  • graymangames-av says:

    After what happened with Kelly Marie Tran and now Halle Bailey, there really is a disturbing trend of Disney not supporting their performers from online abuse.

    They want to put on the air of being more diverse because it benefits their bottom line, but they either aren’t willing to tell more diverse stories, or they leave their casts out to dry.

    • turbotastic-av says:

      Not only did they not support them, Disney basically went out of their way to reward the harassers. How did Disney handle the racist backlash against Tran after Last Jedi? By cutting her character from the next movie almost completely. She went from the most important new character in Episode 8, to barely more than a background character in Episode 9.

      • thegobhoblin-av says:

        There’s a lot to dislike about Rise of Skywalker, but that’s the one that killed it for me. Going into that movie I was more invested in Rose Rico than any other character. Then she got all of two lines that could have been said by anyone. Kelly deserved so much better.

        • simplepoopshoe-av says:

          It was genuinely upsetting. Even in the audience I felt bad for Kelly Marie Tran and I was admittedly wine drunk with my Mom (she really liked BB8)

      • Ruhemaru-av says:

        I kinda put her decreased screentime less on Disney itself and more on JJ making RoS seem like two separate films shoved together and put on fast forward. The film was a mess that had the biggest plot point revealed on Fortnite while other points, like Lando’s kidnapped daughter, came off more like Lando was hitting on her rather than trying to reconnect with a family member.

        • simplepoopshoe-av says:

          I never re-watched TROS. It’s a promise I made to myself after seeing it. And now that time has passed it seems I was correct in thinking events from the film would peacefully slip from my memory.
          That being said, some of the film has blurred for me and honestly until you mentioned it, based on my memory, that was Lando’s love interest.

          • Ruhemaru-av says:

            Lando’s daughter was taken by the First Order and turned into a Stormtrooper the same way Finn was. I think there was only 1-2 lines about it earlier in the film and then the ending sequence just made it seem like he was creeping on a younger woman.

      • simplepoopshoe-av says:

        I’m still not over them reducing Rose’s role. That’s almost racist.
        Also food for thought, up until the very end they threw their entire support toward Jonathon Majors and they have barely said anything since.

    • milligna000-av says:

      What does “support” against foul social media commentary look like, exactly? Some tweets? What exactly weren’t they doing?

  • happyinparaguay-av says:

    Bog Iger

    Not sure if that’s a typo or his new nickname.

  • dp4m-av says:

    “But this year’s Pixar offering—Elemental—feels already forgotten, even as an underperforming punching bag.”I know it’s a popular punching bag, but it’s the 9th highest grossing movie of the year. And significantly outperformed Across the Spider-Verse internationally, which more speaks to Disney’s incapability of properly marketing the film rather than it necessarily being actually bad.“Even when Frozen came out, they had Demi Lovato record a poppier cover of “Let It Go” to send to radio stations, only for the Idina Menzel original to outperform it.”And now my usual reminder that the Demi Lovato version is still pretty great! She’s not Idina Menzel, but I like that version quite a bit as well.

    • it-has-a-super-flavor--it-is-super-calming-av says:

      Let’s not forget, and should go without saying, Angela Lansbury’s one-take recording of Beauty and the Beast was also better than the pop version. Not the singers fault (Celine Dion and Peabo Bryson are formidable), it’s just pop versions of musical numbers are typically lacking.

    • simplepoopshoe-av says:

      Some people think I’m lying when I say this, but I genuinely turned off Avatar: The Way of Water with roughly 40 minutes left. I just didn’t care about the conclusion. After that made as much money as it did I honestly don’t care about the statistic of 9th highest grossing of the year. That means nothing to me.

      • dp4m-av says:

        It doesn’t matter to you, but it was the metric of the movie being used as a punching bag, which was more of the point to the AV Club and others.Also, I loved Avatar: The Way of Water but that’s okay; different people like different things!

  • mydescendants-av says:

    Disappointed AV Club didn’t do enough research to know that Elemental was actually a critical and commercial success. 73% Critics and 93% Audience Rotten Tomatoes scores, nearly $500 million at the worldwide box office. Not saying it got back to pre-pandemic levels of success, but the film was clearly beloved by lots of people… hence all the news articles on Elemental’s word-of-mouth box office comeback.

    Please do research and do not base opinions on false perceptions.

  • it-has-a-super-flavor--it-is-super-calming-av says:

    Seems to me the best stuff released by Disney this year were streaming series.
    Loki, What If…?, Percy Jackson, end of Willow, even Doctor Who. I grew up with The Wonderful World of Disney on TV. Maybe TV’s always been what Disney’s done best. There’s your 100th anniversary celebration (and Doctor Who’s 60th).

  • simplepoopshoe-av says:

    saying that the released Little Mermaid and the unreleased Snow White are failures totally feeds into the racism. 

  • zirconblue-av says:

    EK: For my part, as someone who was pretty invested in the original Avengers saga, one of the things I appreciated was that I could totally understand and enjoy Endgame without watching every single film/TV show/commercial tie-ins, etc. There are so many callbacks that that’s impossible now, and it’s hard to imagine any new fans climbing aboard or returning once they’ve been alienated.I know this is the perception for a lot of people, but I don’t think it’s actually true. Which films or shows since Endgame were actually difficult to follow on their own? No Way Home probably worked a lot better if you are familiar with the previous, non-MCU, incarnations.  But, I haven’t seen either of the Amazing Spider-Man movies, and wasn’t lost at any time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin