C-

Gigi & Nate doesn’t monkey enough with a manipulative formula

Charlie Rowe and Allie the monkey are great, but the God's Not Dead-style plot leaves much to be desired

Film Reviews Marcia Gay Harden
Gigi & Nate doesn’t monkey enough with a manipulative formula
Charlie Rowe stars with Allie the monkey in Gigi & Nate. Photo: Roadside Attractions

For a solid portion of its running time, Gigi & Nate at least delivers what it promises: a young man and his monkey—to be more specific, a young, newly quadriplegic man and his service monkey. When it’s just star Charlie Rowe, neither paralyzed nor American but convincing at playing both, interacting with Allie the monkey (and occasional digital doubles), we get a compelling portrait of how exactly these trainable capuchins interact with humans who can barely move. Or at least who pretend they can barely move; Rowe took care never to present as abled in front of Allie, to ensure she’d believe he needed help.

Surely Rowe isn’t so super-famous that director Nick Hamm couldn’t have found an actual disabled actor for the part, and for a movie that prides itself on hiring many extras with disabilities, that casting choice feels particularly questionable. That humongous issue aside, Rowe’s interactions with Allie remain considerably charming, and you’ll (probably) believe a man and monkey can be best friends.

Unfortunately, the movie takes a good 30 minutes to even mention the notion of a service animal. First, it travels to North Carolina, a detail reiterated by both a sign that reads “North Carolina,” as well as an onscreen title. Here, Nate (Rowe) makes animal noises atop a cliff. He pulls off an impressive flip as he dives off, coming up seemingly unharmed, but his hearing starts to go wonky almost immediately. Before long, meningitis starts sending him into seizures, and eventually paralysis.

David Hudgins’ script does a poor job of detailing the full ramifications of his condition. In one scene, he’s grunting and seemingly nonverbal; in the next, he’s smiling and talking normally. Later, he gains mobility in his arms, suggesting that his condition can improve. If that’s how meningitis actually works, that would be nice to know, because on screen it feels like a magical movie disease whose symptoms vacillate according to the needs of the plot.

With Gigi the monkey, Nate rebounds remarkably quickly from suicidal to affable—despite some poo-flinging. Yet it’s a convincing testimony to the substance of Gigi and Nate’s relationship that when he takes her to a party where she encounters a real risk of danger, it’s heart-sinking. Unfortunately, the final stretch of the movie becomes a riff on God’s Not Dead, though PETA, er, “AFAB,” becomes its cartoon courtroom villain instead of liberal academia. Nate and his family soon face off against lunkheaded animal rights activists, forcing them to defend themselves against accusations of cruelty, and of treating an intelligent primate as a slave. (Isn’t this how the apes rose to rule the planet?)

Gigi & Nate Exclusive Trailer (2022)

In actuality, the battle this film depicts is already lost. The ADA hasn’t accepted capuchin monkeys as service animals since 2010, and the organization that trained them shuttered last year. Gigi & Nate is loosely inspired by a true story, but one that technically no longer applies. There’s never any indication that we’re watching a period piece, however, even though it does feature a four-year jump in time. Meanwhile, if you’re questioning whether or not this wannabe inspirational story will end unhappily, you’re misjudging the kind of film this is.

While Rowe and Allie are clearly the stars here, they’re surrounded by some entertaining old hands. Marcia Gay Harden, as Nate’s mom, vividly exudes the quality of “long-suffering;” Jim Belushi, as his dad, gets in at least one standout sarcastic slow clap. Then there’s Diane Ladd, a vodka-swilling grandma she plays so convincingly you’d think she was drinking between takes as well. There’s only so much these seasoned character actors can do to save a movie like this, the kind where Rowe’s voice-over delivers chestnuts like “We thought we were rescuing her…” Ultimately, if you paid to see Gigi & Nate, you might be the one who needs the rescuing.

10 Comments

  • 10cities10years-av says:

    So, wait, for the first 30 minutes of the film the Nate character isn’t disabled, and the reviewer is wondering why they didn’t use a disabled actor to play the character?

    • wuthaniel-av says:

      I was thinking that at first, but considering the advancents in facial mapping and deepfakes, they easily could have used disabled actor and pasted his face onto another actor for the few scenes at the beginning. I get a feeling that would also somehow bother people, though

    • lyt-av says:

      No, for the first 30 minutes they don’t mention a service animal.

  • cosmiagramma-av says:

    What the fuck is Marcia Gay Harden doing here?

  • batteredsuitcase-av says:

    Eh, I’ll watch anything with a monkey in it

    • junwello-av says:

      I feel that way about movies with bears.

      • v61-av says:

        I hope the film does not gloss over the difficulties of owning monkeys. Some places ban owning them because they are wild animals. Monkeys require a lot of stimulation, specialized vets, decades of commitment, many have difficult personalities, they can’t be housebroken, they bite, some self-mutilate if bored, etc. I recommend donating to good sanctuaries instead. Some have open house days or guided tours. 

  • coatituesday-av says:

    Nah, if you’re looking for a wheelchair-bound-character-with-a-helper-monkey movie, you only need George Romero’s Monkey Shines.I gather it’s not as uplifting as this one.

    • siemprepalante77-av says:

      True indeed. When I saw the commercial for this the other day, I really thought it was a remake until I saw the “Inspired by a true story”…lolMonkey Shines was so fun. Totally forgot it was a Romero film. Thanks for the reminder.

      • coatituesday-av says:

        Monkey Shines was based on a pretty good novel by Michael Stewart, who for years I’d thought must have also been a doctor at one time. He wasn’t, but he obviously did a ton of medical research he did for Monkey Shines. That knowledge shows in the book but it’s never an expositional slog.  It’s been years since I read the book or saw the movie but I remember the movie being a good adaptation and remember liking George Romero a lot for it – he could have really turned on the gore if he’d felt like it but instead made a relatively quiet, creepy thriller.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin