C-

Heart Of Stone review: Gal Gadot accepts an impossible mission

Netflix’s derivative franchise hopeful is a spy thriller with ample spying but few thrills

Film Reviews Heart of Stone
Heart Of Stone review: Gal Gadot accepts an impossible mission
Gal Gadot in Heart Of Stone Image: Netflix

On its surface, Heart Of Stone certainly has all the markings of an intriguing spy-thriller: A hero who’d sacrifice themselves for the greater good battling a villain who’d stop at nothing, a mystery revolving around a powerful artificial intelligence device, a handful of international locations that photograph well, and lots of death-defying stunts. Trouble is, we saw that mix a month ago, only constructed with greater efficiency and entertainment in Mission: Impossible—Dead Reckoning Part 1. Functioning as a third-gen mimeograph at best and a dull actioner at worst, Netflix’s bid to jump-start to a potential franchise lacks the inspiration and innovation it needs to truly impress.

A rolling stone gathers no moss, a proverb that lonesome super spy Rachel Stone (Gal Gadot) knows to be true. Her job affords her no time for a personal life. She even shudders at the mere suggestion of adopting a low-maintenance cat. But she does value the friendships made with her MI6 colleagues, driver Bailey (Paul Ready) and field agents Yang (Jing Lusi) and Parker (Jamie Dornan), as they’ve bonded over baddies and bad times. However, Rachel’s harboring a big secret: She’s also working undercover as part of an elite, clandestine force known as The Charter, a worldwide organization of spies tasked with supervising crime-stopping government operatives.

Rachel’s current objective is to oversee the safety of her team as they hunt down an underground criminal syndicate that’s been tapping into top secret military tech to fund its mysterious operation. On a mission at a ski chalet in the Alps, Rachel and her team lose their mark, but spot another: Keya (Alia Bhatt), a 22-year-old orphaned hacker from India. She and an elusive yet-to-be-revealed partner are looking to take down The Charter by robbing them of their artificial intelligence program—referred to as “The Heart”—which contains the power to control all of the world’s information. As their globe-trotting game of keep-away ensues, betrayals occur and stakes are raised.

Director Tom Harper and screenwriters Greg Rucka and Allison Schroeder (working from a story by Rucka) instill the film with some thought-provoking thematic ideas on the nature of evil and they sound a faint alarm on technology’s evolving capabilities. However, they have trouble fleshing out their characters beyond one-dimensional portraits of how action heroes and villains behave and sound. It’s a relief that Rachel and Keya are given a smartly intertwined arc that’s sufficiently followed through, instead of stereotypical two-women-fighting-each-other shenanigans. Yet their hokey, cringe-inducing dialogue (which sounds like lines lifted from generic genre sludge compiled by a computer, and delivered with just as much passion) works overtime to undo whatever good elements are there—shocking given both Gadot (Wonder Woman) and Bhatt (Gangubai Kathiawad) are dynamic, compelling performers. Even Dornan, a versatile actor who handled drama (Belfast) and comedy (Barb And Star Go To Vista Del Mar) in the same year, is railroaded by his personality-free material.

Sadly, the mediocrity extends to the action, which lacks oomph, interest and a propulsive sense of fun. Stunt choreography fails to provide awe and amazement, due partially to its raggedy editing and close-up framing. From the car pursuit in Lisbon to skydiving onto and off of a blimp in West Africa, these sequences are predictable and perfunctory, rather than ingenious and imaginative. Not until late in the film does a ray of light shine through during a high-speed motorbike chase involving Rachel, a blonde henchman and a truck driver on the highways of Iceland, where action and levity commingle to great results. But overall, the feature’s James Bond-style (replete with a Rihanna-knock-off-meets-John Barry-clone opening credits theme song) and Mission: Impossible-esque aspirations go unfulfilled.

Heart of Stone | Gal Gadot | Official Trailer | Netflix

There’s a certain sense of irony about a plot hinging on a computer that uses algorithms to predict what people will do, given this is from a studio that uses algorithms to predict what people will like. And it seems the filmmakers are smartly hiding this—blessedly pushing back against this soulless style of creative decision making—in the underlying commentary showing the heroine triumphing whenever she’s guided by her heart rather than the analytics when assessing her options. Unfortunately, they hold themselves back far too frequently, perhaps fearing biting the hand that feeds them.

Similar to Extraction, Chris Hemsworth’s stunt-driven franchise for the same streamer which started out rough and led to a far superior sequel, maybe Gadot’s vanity vehicle will be given the same grace to return again, rolling harder and smarter, especially if subscribers click play. What’s there demonstrates a modicum of decent world-building, from which filmmakers can hopefully spin-off better, more capably crafted capers.

Heart Of Stone streams exclusively on Netflix on August 11

19 Comments

  • rpdm-av says:

    She looks like she uses a titanium d i l d o – Thi Cj, London, United Kingdom, Summer 2015

  • andrewbare29-av says:

    Gadot…dynamic, compelling performer….Yeah…about that.

  • themightymanotaur-av says:

    Gadot’s a dynamic, compelling performer? She sounds exactly the same in every single role, monotone and with barely any emotion. It worked ok for Wonder Woman as a woman out of time and place but when you hear the same voice in other roles all it proves is she has zero range.

    She is not a good actor at all. She is absolutely gorgeous but that only takes you so far.

  • bluto-blutowski-av says:

    “Chris Hemsworth’s stunt-driven franchise for the same streamer which started out rough and led to a far superior sequel”

    Is that really the convetional wisdom on Extraction I and II?

  • murrychang-av says:

    I guess you can technically say she’s dynamic, but compelling she is not.

  • everythingnow-av says:

    Her NAME is Stone?!?! Noooooo hahaha this feels like one of those fake movies that they showed in Tropic Thunder.

    • inspectorhammer-av says:

      ‘Character name is intended to fit into the title phrase’ is definitely a sign that a movie’s not going to be great. Doesn’t necessarily mean it’s going to be terrible, but it’s not the mark of something special.The trailer for this definitely looked like it would be a C-graded film.  Had that ‘spent a lot on effects but the writing isn’t great’ feel that seems to be plaguing spy thrillers put out by big streamers.

      • bassplayerconvention-av says:

        ‘Character name is intended to fit into the title phrase’ is definitely a
        sign that a movie’s not going to be great. Doesn’t necessarily mean
        it’s going to be terrible, but it’s not the mark of something special.

        They do it twice though, with the McGuffin being named “The Heart”. Which is a bold move, in a weird, sweaty way.

    • drkschtz-av says:

      I see your Rachel Stone and raise you Tyler Rake.

  • h3rm35-av says:

    I mean, Netflix KNOWS this is a budget version of Mission Impossible, how could it not? This article seems to be written under the premise that it ignored that fact and was released as competition, but I strongly suspect that they’re just trying to cruise along in MI’s wake. Big spy movie comes out? People get into a spy mood for a little while, so they watch more of the same for a while. No one knows this better than Netflix and their binging model.
    Asylum films has used the same tactic for their entire existence and became quite profitable doing so.

  • refinedbean-av says:

    Gal Godot is just not up to this, y’all. She can’t do it. It’s not gonna work.

  • matt-martinez-av says:

    I’ll probably check this out anyway because I really like Greg Rucka. It’s kinda funny that he wrote for a movie starring Gal Gadot since he also wrote one of the best runs of Wonder Woman ever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin