Here’s everything you need to know about tomorrow’s 2022 Grammy nominations

There's a massive change in the nominating process that could shake things up. Also, expect a good day for Olivia Rodrigo

Music News 2022 Grammy
Here’s everything you need to know about tomorrow’s 2022 Grammy nominations
Olivia Rodrigo (Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty), a Grammy award (Photo: Jeff Schear/Getty), and Billie Eilish (Photo: Rich Fury/Getty) Image: The A.V. Club

It’s almost time for the nominations for 2022's 64th annual Grammy Awards to be revealed, and this year, there might actually be some notable shifts in who gets selected. Read on to see the details about this coming year’s awards, who you can expect to see racking up nominations tomorrow, and why, even if there are once again notable upsets or snubs, it’ll at least be a (supposedly) fair outcome.

The Grammys Awards nomination process has changed

Thanks to some changes made in the wake of last year’s controversy over The Weeknd being completely shut out, despite having one of the most successful albums of the year (and, in the case of “Blinding Lights,” one of the biggest singles of the century thus far), there’s a new process in place—not necessarily a more discerning one, but certainly more democratic.

The Recording Academy has officially disbanded the “secret” nominating committees of years past. Prior to this, groups of artists, creators, and “industry experts” (whatever that means) curated the final lists of nominations, essentially picking whoever they wanted from the top 20 candidates determined by the broader Grammy voting body. Which is a fairly large pool from which to be selecting, meaning there was quite a bit of cherry-picking going on.

Instead, now the nominees will simply be the artists who received the largest number of votes from the entire body of eligible Academy members. In practice, this could well mean populist artists that have historically been overlooked will get a better shot at Grammy statues. (Read: BTS has a real chance to become the first K-pop act to get a Record of the Year nomination, for “Butter.”)

The Academy also took much bigger steps than in years past towards diversifying its membership. Last year’s 2,710 invitations to new members were 48% female and drew 55% of their body from “traditionally underrepresented groups.” This is part of the push to reach 2,500 women Academy members by 2025.

Olivia Rodrigo, Billie Eilish, and more can expect good news

Though even with the improvements in transparency about the process, we likely won’t see a huge change in which artists get nominated, save for the likely inclusion of more commercially popular fare. The Grammys have historically used the large number of categories available to spread the love among most major artists in any given year, so it’s not like there was some hyper-elitist gatekeeping going on or anything. Still, some musicians should prepare themselves for good news (if you consider a Grammy nom good news and not a potential curse, that is).

Olivia Rodrigo had one of the most successful singles of the year with “Driver’s License,” and one of the best-selling and most acclaimed albums with SOUR. Similarly, Billie Eilish is now a Grammy darling, and even though Happier Than Ever didn’t receive as positive a critical reception as her debut, it’s still enormously popular, and as an Academy darling on a hot streak, there’s almost no chance she’ll be ignored.

Other likely shoo-ins for nominations tomorrow include: Lil Nas X for “Montero (Call Me By Your Name)”; Doja Cat and SZA for “Kiss Me More”; Taylor Swift for evermore; Silk Sonic for “Leave The Door Open”; Justin Bieber for Justice (and “Peaches”); and Ariana Grande for “Positions.”

Again, these are all likely due in large part to the fact that the Academy is always loathe to look behind the times by not acknowledging as many of the year’s most successful artists as possible; and they presumably bent over backwards this year to avoid any Weeknd-style publicity disasters.

How to watch the Grammy nominations and the Grammy Awards

The Grammy nominations are set to be announced on Tuesday, November 23, at 12 p.m. ET via livestream on the Grammy website. Then, be sure to check back in at The A.V. Club for a breakdown of the nominees, as well as a discussion of the most surprising inclusions and exclusions.

The 64th Grammys will take place on Monday, January 31st at 8 p.m. ET—you can watch either on CBS or via streaming service Paramount+.

19 Comments

  • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

    So how do I become an Eilish Mouseketeer?

  • cuzned-av says:

    I clicked on the headline and was surprised to be directed to this page, with lots of words on it.

  • mwfuller-av says:

    If Beck beats Beyonce again, I’m going to bloody well smash my tele into ruin.  On the other hand, I can definitely see Jethro Tull winning this year in the best Metal category.

    • drew8mr-av says:

      The controversy around this still cracks me up. First, the category was “hard rock or heavy metal”, not just “heavy metal” and Tull was a long established band who had sold way more career albums than Metallica at that point. Was it a “make up Grammy”? For sure, but the Grammys do that crap every year.

      • jmyoung123-av says:

        But they aren’t even a hard rock band, just a rock band. I mean, if you took the hardest songs they had released over the previous 20 years, maybe you could make a hard rock album, but seriously. And it was the very first year of the award and to give it to Tull (as what was clearly a make-up award as you noted) rather than the top metal band of the time seemed and seems absurd. Even Jethro Tull thought it was absurd.

        • drew8mr-av says:

          Eh, they got labeled hard rock because of Aqualung I’m sure, which is probably the only thing Grammy voters knew them for. They were only played on rock radio as well. The early records were pretty traditional hard blues rock though. And the Grammys have a very loose sense of genre anyway. Should Metallica have won? Probably, but like I said, there’s at least one travesty a year, it’s weird to me that this is the one people fixate on, especially since everyone who cared must be in their 50s by now.

      • captain-splendid-av says:

        Wait, we’re calling Jethro Tull “Hard Rock” now?  WTF?

        • drew8mr-av says:

          LOL, Aerosmith was considered hard rock back in the day and pre “Thick As A Brick” Tull  was a blues based guitar band.

      • lucilletwostep-av says:

        This year they put Brandi Carlile into the pop category – meanwhile she won Americana Artist of the year.  It’s all so messy. 

      • zerowonder-av says:
    • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

      If Beck beats Beyonce again, I’ll bloody bludgeon me boob box to bleedin’ . . . ‘blivion!
      Braying balderdash about Brice Beckham . . . !

  • peterkingdiamond-av says:

    Here’s all I need to know. Multiple artists will get hosed and the whole thing is not worth watching.

  • stormylewis-av says:

    If Allison Russell doesn’t get some, people are stupid and have terrible taste in music.  

  • wrecksracer-av says:

    I’m tempted to see if anything I listen to even got nominated. The Grammys are more of a “reverse barometer” for me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin