Bryan Cranston and Annette Bening cash in with Jerry & Marge Go Large
Accomplished stars take a low-key approach in a light comedy about retirees who exploit a lottery loophole
Film Reviews Bryan Cranston
Premiering at the Tribeca Film Festival in advance of its bow on Paramount+, Jerry & Marge Go Large is inspired by the true story of a pair of retirees who exploit, entirely legally, a mathematical loophole in the state lottery to win millions of dollars for themselves, their friends, and their neighbors. In telling this tale, director David Frankel delivers a crowd-pleasing light comedy which briefly flirts with notions of more substantive allegorical engagement before settling for, and into, an easygoing domestic groove, connecting most roundly by way of winning performances from Bryan Cranston and Annette Bening.
The pair star as Jerry and Marge Selbee, empty-nest high school sweethearts who’ve raised their son Ben (Jake McDorman) and daughter Dawn (Anna Camp) in Evart, Michigan, a single-stoplight town with a population of less than 2,000. When Jerry gets nudged into retirement, he finds himself restless, his penchant for mental engagement tested.
One day he spots a brochure for the Winfall lottery, reads the fine print, and notices a loophole. When the jackpot hits a certain amount without a big six-digit winner, it triggers a “roll-down,” with accrued money that is then divided amongst lower-tier prize winners. This changes the odds and tilts them in favor of players—just a bit, but more dramatically for those who have bought tickets in appropriate volume.
Jerry tests his theory, refines it, and then lets his wife in on the secret. He expects her to preach restraint, but Marge embraces with enthusiasm the notion of gambling their savings. They quickly double their modest checking account balance, and soon establish an incorporated investment firm to pool the money of fellow Evart citizens, selling shares at $500 apiece.
After the Winfall game closes in their state, Jerry and Marge commit themselves to regular marathon road trips to Massachusetts, where they spend up to 12 hours per day printing out tickets. It’s finally then when someone else cracks this code—a group of Harvard students, led by Tyler (Uly Schlesinger, lacking the developed tool kit to flesh out his character beyond an avatar of smarmy privilege and entitlement). This presents Jerry and Marge not merely with competition, but an active threat.
Frankel (The Devil Wears Prada, Marley & Me) is a capable director with plenty of experience in helping to locate and pull to the fore hidden reservoirs of genuine feeling in sometimes thin nonfiction source material. Jerry & Marge Go Large, though, yields to framing which seems a bit reductive, even if it is largely in its helmer’s wheelhouse.
The film takes its form from an article by investigative journalist Jason Fagone, whose work has often assayed the colorful contours of other curiosities of Americana (competitive eating, a contest to create a 100 miles-per-gallon vehicle). As hammered into screenplay shape by Brad Copeland (Arrested Development, Wild Hogs), however, the material here leans a bit too heartily into the formulaic antagonism of educated but nasty young elites versus “life smart” decent folks.
This focus come at the expense of the stories of the friends Jerry and Marge are helping, and the town they’re revitalizing. While there are some personal indulgences, most of the windfall from the Evart winnings gets cycled back into downtown—a reopened ice cream shop, a rebuilt public rotunda that could accommodate a reconstituted JazzFest which, fingers crossed, might be suitable enough to one day entice Steely Dan for an appearance.
To the movie’s credit, these modest dreams aren’t played for empty jokes. But neither does Jerry & Marge Go Large quite give them full and equal spotlight. Instead, time is increasingly ceded to the Harvard group’s attempts to muscle out the Evart group, as well as a Boston Globe reporter, Miya Jordan (Tracie Thoms), investigating not only the players’ strange patterns but the revelation that bureaucrats are okay with the loophole since it funnels additional profits to the state.
With a bit of narrative massage, it’s easy to envision a different version of Jerry & Marge Go Large which might capture the interest of Alexander Payne or a likeminded filmmaker—a slightly more ambitious movie which uses the exploits of its eponymous characters, and their establishment of a sort of Everyman hedge fund, to offer a broader commentary about what we choose to value and center in modern-day America. This isn’t quite that film. That certainly isn’t the grandest sin. It simply means Jerry & Marge Go Large lands as a diverting amusement—an underdog tale more in the vein of Queenpins rather than something which lingers longer, and stands out as a portrait of its time.
That said, harping too much on shortcomings of omission rather than commission runs the risk of shortchanging the movie’s considerable pleasures. Assisted by a lively score from Jake Monaco that appropriately threads the needle between sentimentality and playfulness, Frankel delivers a well-crafted, energetically paced movie that is consistently appealing.
Years on from the conclusion of Breaking Bad, it may seem silly to spend a lot of time praising Cranston, who has the ability to believably convey goofiness, menace, and everything in between. His talent by now just seems self-evident. But it’s worth pointing out that he’s the definition of an actor who understands the assignment, a performer who uses both his innate intelligence and work ethic to bring additional meaning and poignance to scenes. Here he once again locates a physical vocabulary which communicates the depth and complexity of Jerry’s inner feelings—including the regret and sadness which can still exist within the framework of something many would recognize as middle-class success.
Late in the movie, there is one short monologue, beautifully delivered by Cranston, which further unpacks Jerry’s sense of low-key dislocation—even from his family. In it, he talks about the moment he grasped that his natural knack with numbers was not a gift, but rather a trick. “Your brain tells you you’re seeing what others don’t see, but in the end you’re just seeing less,” he says to his wife.
It’s a nicely crafted, illuminating moment of self-realization, heartbreaking and sweet at the same time. Most of Jerry & Marge Go Large’s shading, however, lies in simple and straightforward character interplay. And it’s here that all of Cranston and Bening’s small, smart choices (an averted gaze here, a deflective line reading there, his body posture, her widening of eyes) deliver a multiplied audience engagement. These veteran performers make these two characters likable and, more importantly, fully knowable, and through them Jerry & Marge Go Large fully breathes.
29 Comments
“His talent by now just seems self-evident.”So true, and it’s kind of wild to look back to when he was known for Malcolm in the Middle and a recurring minor Seinfeld character. I expect it’s why so many people thought Breaking Bad was going to be a comedy (well, that and the season 1 poster of him in his grippers). He reinforces that great comedic actors tend to have the most range while many dramatic actors have a hard time playing funny.
He’s pretty incredible on Malcolm in the Middle too. It’s a fully unique character on TV, his skills don’t match up with just being a funny sitcom actor.
That is one of the best shows of this century and I will die on this hill. It serves on so many levels. My 10yo likes it as much as my husband and I do.
It totally is .
“Hal, you’re just doing this to get out of cleaning the closet.”“Not entirely.”
Let’s call it, uh, chork. All in favor? Anyone for picken? Chork it is.
I’m rewatching Malcolm in the Middle right now – I’m with sarahmas, I don’t think the show gets nearly enough credit for how good it is – and while Jane Kaczmarek is absolutely fantastic in her own right, Cranston is just soooo good as Hal. There’s a whole *person* there.
The roller skating episode is a fucking tour de force performance from Cranston. I don’t know how anyone could watch that episode and not think “This guy can do anything.”
Oh he and Kazmarek were the main draw for that show, for sure. How much fun would it have been to hang out with Bradley Whitford and her?
The Newhart-style alternate ending for Breaking Bad he did with Kazmarek is hilarious.
How have I never seen this??“And there was this guy who never spoke, he just rang a bell!”That’s fucking priceless.
It was an originally an extra on the Breaking Bad series DVD set.
The first season of Breaking Bad was definitely a dark comedy.
he was great in the x-files
I remember him when he was being featured in advertisements for a year or two before he started getting roles.
I maintain that comedy can’t really be taught. Ya either got it or ya don’t.
He was also on Babylon 5
He also did a lot of voice work in English anime dubs
I had next to no interest in seeing this, but… the casting of Cranston and Bening is inspired. I’ve never seen either give a bad performance and the thought of them playing a small-town retired couple warms my heart.So, maybe I’ll give it a try.
FYI, the ‘active threat’ wasn’t really one and it wasn’t Harvard, it was a group of graduate students from MIT who also cashed in big after discovering the loophole and went at it hard as well as a Boston University student named Ying Zhing who did the same thing the Selbee’s did and established a partnership to bet big on Winfall (though not enough to match the Selbee’s and the MIT guys)It’s a pretty cool story overall and I am glad they are getting a treatment about their unique tale.
One of my least favorite things about projects “based on a true story” is when they turn a real person into a villain for dramatic reasons, so I guess using fictional characters for that purpose is an improvement of sorts.Of course realizing you can also tell an interesting story without forcing stereotypical “bad guys” into the narrative would be even better.
Yea, they needed to apparently ‘juice it up’ for dramatic relief but deep down, it was pretty straight forward. The couple owned a convenience store and sold it and were just kinda being retired until Mr. Selbee managed to read what the Winfall did and his mathematics background automatically calculated this could shift odds in his favor if they did a lot of tickets – apparently it took him all of 15 minutes to figure it out as I remember.So he went and played (and didn’t tell the wife since he took all their money to test it), won his money back and a small return, and it was off to the race so to speak once he let the wife in on it. I will let the story go on it own but needless to say, they did very VERY well. The great thing is that Selbee’s apparently were still the same after and didn’t go nuts with the windfall (though wait till you see what they did for their family)
The recap of the real events as I read it said the MIT group realized that they could trigger the “roll down” of the jackpot a week earlier than the Michigan expected by buying even more tickets. Sounded like it only worked once and that Jerry was pissed. Like, him discovering a loophole was fine but someone else exploiting the rules in a way he had not anticipated was some ethical breach.
I wonder if Harvard sounds more evil than MIT. The latter gave Will Hunting a shot.
They had me at Bryan Cranston kicks a boat’s ass.
Trying to replicate the success Kevin & Perry Go Large with an American cast was always going to be a big ask.
The source article by Fagone is fantastic.
“Tell ‘em Regular-size Marge sent ya!”
People talk a lot about how bad the “new” AV Club is compared with the “old” AV Club, and I’ll admit I definitely miss all the features and series that I used to read with such delight, but a review like this stands as testament to the fact that the virtues of the “old” AV Club are far from entirely lost. I don’t know that I’ll ever see this movie, but this review seems like a fair, even-handed, insightful and thorough exploration of the movie’s strengths and flaws, as well as a consideration of what flaws (such as the “flaws of omission” bit) are even worth weighing against the movie’s charms. Solid, respectable work, Brent.