Julia Louis-Dreyfus finds railing against political correctness to be a “red flag”
In April, Louis-Dreyfus' old co-star, Jerry Seinfeld, blamed the fact that he thinks there's no more "funny stuff" on TV on "the extreme left and P.C. crap"
Aux News Louis-Dreyfus
If anyone should get to comment on political correctness in comedy it’s Julia Louis-Dreyfus, who won multiple Emmys for playing one of the most politically incorrect characters ever put on screen in Veep. But while Louis-Dreyfus’ run as (Vice) President Selina Meyer thoroughly proved that you can be hilarious and still push boundaries in the 21st century, the actor’s recent comments didn’t come in response to any of the wild string of insults she lobbed on that show.
In a widely shared New Yorker interview from April, Louis-Dreyfus’ old co-star, Jerry Seinfeld, suggested that there was no “funny stuff” on TV anymore as a result of “the extreme left and P.C. crap, and people worrying so much about offending other people.” Unfortunately for Seinfeld, it seems like the fact that he can’t put funny stuff onscreen anymore is his own fault, not anyone else’s. (We gave his recent film Unfrosted a “C.” ) Even worse for the comedian, Louis-Dreyfus managed to make his anti-woke comments look even more “old man yells at cloud” in a recent, tactful response in The New York Times.
“If you look back on comedy and drama both, let’s say 30 years ago, through the lens of today, you might find bits and pieces that don’t age well. And I think to have an antenna about sensitivities is not a bad thing. It doesn’t mean that all comedy goes out the window as a result,” she said. Without explicitly naming Seinfeld (although the interviewer did name him in her question), Louis-Dreyfus continued: “When I hear people starting to complain about political correctness—and I understand why people might push back on it—but to me that’s a red flag, because it sometimes means something else.”
“I think it’s just good to be vigilant,” the actor continued on a follow-up call with the outlet 11 days later. “[T]he bigger problem—and I think the true threat to art and the creation of art—is the consolidation of money and power. All this siloing of studios and outlets and streamers and distributors—I don’t think it’s good for the creative voice. So that’s what I want to say in terms of the threat to art.” No one in their right mind would ever want Selina Meyer to be the president of the country (or anything really), but Julia? She’s on the right track.
261 Comments
Ah, Jerry Seinfeld: the man who was barely relevant on the TV show that bore his name.
Been rewatching the series since it hit Netflix and you’re not wrong. He’s often the least essential part of the episode.
This is a silly take. His comedic voice is almost as much a part of the show’s DNA as Larry David’s. They needed each other to make that show what it was. Curb is amazing, but Larry alone is way too acerbic to have gotten to be that successful—and Curb is Larry AFTER Seinfeld (the show), having learned lessons from it. If he’d tried to make a Seinfeld-esque sitcom alone in the 90s, it would have had the plug pulled on it swiftly. Or been relegated to HBO or something, another cult classic like the Shandling Show that was beloved by comedians and seen by almost no one else.
I watched a few episodes of the show when it was airing and I came away with the same feeling. Maybe it can be argued that his co-stars were only as funny as they were b/c of Seinfeld’s presence but I can honestly say i’ve never once found him funny.
Yes, totally irrelevant, other than complete creative control over the direction of the show and creating the show to begin with.People say such stupid things when they’re trying to rewrite history.
I love her so much.
Reminds me a bit of Xena kicking Jerkules’ ass on twitter over his continuous stream of B.S.
The GOAT
One thing that actually bothers me about that episode—-in the early years, Elaine is said to have a very high IQ, so unless being around Jerry, George, and Kramer somehow dumped her IQ like 40+ points, how on earth would she think putting out an “Urban Sombrero” at all, never mind putting it on the COVER, would work?Then again, it is a sitcom.
Fashion is frequently dumb and capricious. She thought she could play the game.
Elaine devolves rapidly in the show around the dudetrio, and there’s even an arc where she finds a better version of them and becomes a better person but realizes she is addicted to being terrible and dumb.
Oh yeah everyone in the show got was dumber and more cartoonish over the years, to the point where later seasons could joke about it. But savvy people have still bet on things way dumber than the urban sombrero.
It was a peach!
Being smart doesn’t automatically make you good at marketing. lol And honestly have you seen those dumbass hats people have been wearing the last few years? SNL even made a sketch about them (“Big Dumb Hat”). Honestly she was just before her time with the urban sombrero.
Come on. I’d buy that if it wasn’t for something so obviously destined for failure.I have zero sense of fashion and I could tell you that was never going to work in a million years.Think about it. Urban Sombrero. Seriously?Still a great episode though.
That was the joke. She was full of unearned hubris and ran with an idea she had because she thought she was smarter than everyone else because she fell backwards into a position of authority. I fully reject the idea that smart people never make mistakes or bad work decisions or never ignore red flags and do something that seems stupid to everyone else. Her IQ has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Omg, they made red flags “woke” now ffs
Is there anything that doesn’t offend you?Because to be clear… all your cancel cutlure whining is just projection. You are offended that people have opinions you disagree with. That’s it.You’re not a defender of free speech. You’re a defending of your opinions. And use “pc/woke” as a way to dismiss and silence opinions you don’t like.You are the most delicate of snowflakes.
I just…don’t know what the fuck Seinfeld is on about. Dude never was in any danger of being too fucking edgy, blue, or controversial. I’ve not seen a single thing that approaches even the tamer parts of a Bill Burr or Patton Oswalt show.FFS, we’re in an era in which I Think You Should Leave, Always Sunny, Kill Tony (on the stand-up side), regular Netflix specials chock full of raunchiness…so what the fuck is he on about?Is he pissed that the network sitcom is a dying breed? If so…wouldn’t that be a problem with the modern media landscape, moreso than irascible zoomers getting in their feelings about traffic and airline jokes?
Jerry was a leader in late 90s ‘gay panic’ jokes.I suspect a lot of his whining is about the fact that most people under 35 don’t think puffy shirt = gay is funny or a punchline.
Huh. I’m upsettingly over 35 and I always thought the joke was just that the shirt was ridiculous, and made you look like a pirate.
It was.
“They keep moving the lines in for some reason. I do this joke about the way people justify about using their cell phone. You don’t seem important the way you scroll through them like a gay French king. I did this line recently in front of a live audience. They thought, ‘What do you mean gay? What are you doing? What do you mean gay?’” Seinfeld concludes, “And I thought, are you kidding me? There’s a creepy PC thing out there that really bothers me.”- Jerry SeinfeldYou can miss the forest for the trees if that makes you happy. But my point stands. It’s not funny, Jerry. People aren’t super offended. It’s just not funny.
Huh? Did you reply to the wrong person? I’m just saying that specific joke never registered that way with me. I wasn’t even arguing with you, I was ready to accept your interpretation. Though everyone else seems to agree with my interpretation that it wasn’t a gay joke.
Nope.It was intended for you.My point wasn’t about the example. The point was about Seinfeld and who he is. You focused on a puffy tree, and missed the point.
I only commented on that one gag. (Puffy shirt not tree.) You’re projecting whatever else you think I was trying to say about Jerry Seinfeld.
It’s so hard to do comedy these days without offending people with names like Buttsoup.
I wouldn’t worry about it, dude likes to fight people in the comments.
That I’m used to, but man you’d think he could find a better target. It’s bizarre to just put words in someone’s mouth and then try to call them out for it.
He had a prime opportunity to test his theory by simply dropping the word “gay” and seeing if the joke played. I guess when you get to a certain level of wealth and reputation, workshopping your material is a tad harder than just complaining about the audience.
Yeah that’s not funny at all wtf. lol
Also what does it mean they “keep moving the lines”? It’s been bad form to use “gay” as a insult for many, many years now. Where has he been?
pirate jokes are homophobic now? weird
I guess when you think about it, pirates probably were pretty gay.
Same. I am 39 and until today I had no idea it was a gay joke. I thought the gag was that it made him look like a pirate (and generally ridiculous).
The consensus seems to be it wasn’t a gay joke at all, and Buttsoup Barns is just being weird.
So…to be fair I never understood “puffy shirt = gay” to be the joke there. I didn’t see any suggestion of that. They just said it looked stupid.I mean there were obvious gay panic jokes (“I think it moved!”), and lots of them, but I don’t think that was one.
i alway found the gay panic jokes to be more about Georges insecurities then at any gay persons expense
Oh I completely agree. I never felt they were punching down with the gay panic jokes. They always treated gay people as well as they treated anyone else. I remember the episode where Jerry is sitting having a “champagne coolie” with the gay wigmaster dude, and he even gets offended that someone doesn’t think the guy is his boyfriend. I think that’s one thing the show handled really well.
I’ve watched that episode more times than I can count since it was first on, and all I thought was that it was a weird shirt that looked like a pirate, not anything gay-related. Maybe that’s just your take on it.Anyway, Jerry won a GLAAD award for the “not that there’s anything wrong with that” episode, so the people who adults then saw it differently.
The “not that there’s anything wrong with that” episode is an interesting artefact. It had an impact at the time because queerness was something that was gaining a level of mainstream acceptance, and so people often were unsure how they were meant to talk about a thing they were aware of but weren’t necessarily comfortable with. Nowadays, the joke wouldn’t land; a person saying “not that there’s anything wrong with that” at the mere mention of gayness would come across as bizarre at best and an overcompensating homophobe at worst. I wouldn’t say the episode has aged badly (a phrase I think gets used too much), but it certainly has aged.
“George is into it!”
I think Jerry is still broken up over how Michael Richards has been basically ostracized from society, but what he did would have gotten him “cancelled” during Seinfeld’s run, so it makes no sense.
If that’s true, it’s actually like much worse? “damn woke leftists won’t even let you scream racial epithets at your audience anymore!”
I’ll never forget his shared appearance with Richards on Letterman following the incident, and Seinfeld telling the crowd who are—understandably—laughing nervously at Richards’ comments, “Stop laughing. It’s not funny.” That smug, clueless reaction pretty much sums up Seinfeld for me.
Other fun stuff in that video: * He says he’s “very, very sorry” to “the blacks, the Hispanics, the whites”
* He expresses concern that his racist rant will lead to a “black-white conflict” and muses on “how blacks [sic] feel about Katrina”, seeming to imply that black people are so naturally violent that a racist tirade from a comedian would be enough to cause a “black-white conflict” to erupt around the nation.
I can understand why the audience is laughing nervously, but also I think it wasn’t wrong for Seinfeld to say “stop laughing.” It’s unfortunate that Michael Richards is trying to sincerely apologize and is struggling partly due to the laughter (although, I have to say, it’s more unfortunate what he said originally). I think the worst part, having watched it again just now, was the setup and framing of the apology, which was on Letterman (probably) and Seinfeld, not Richards. At the end, Seinfeld makes a joke about segueing back into comedy. Only Richards, Seinfeld, and Letterman knew this very serious apology was coming, and they didn’t prepare the audience sufficiently for that; however, this kind of thing wasn’t really done back then either, so I think it’s a little harsh to overly criticize them either.And again, it’s unfortunate that Michael Richards couldn’t make proper amends, for whatever reason, but there was absolutely no excuse for what he said either. This wasn’t 1950, there’s no way anyone can make an argument that what he said is something that should ever have come out of his mouth like that. I also think Jerry Seinfeld is hopelessly out of touch, and as someone who still loves watching reruns of Seinfeld, that’s too bad. But back to the article, absolutely love Julia Louis-Dreyfus’ response.
He’s literally just mad that young audiences don’t connect with his material, so he has to fabricate a reason why that isn’t his comedy sucking.
Yeah, a few years ago, before is woke-cancel-culture bullshit rant, he was whinging about how no one comes to his shows in college towns any more.
They sure connect with his older material. Seinfield has consistently topped Netflix viewership charts and they spent $500 million to keep exclusive streaming rights.
I think you mean Larry David’s older material.
yeah for sure. he’s mad at himself for being in his 70s and is blaming young people for it haha.
Maybe he’s not a fan of the Twitter-spehere? Which I wouldn’t blame him for, but if that’s the case, he sure did a bad job of saying so.
Whaddya mean “sphere”!?
(that’s right, I’m a Flat-Twitterist!)
I could see his argument coming from the perspective of someone who appreciates offensive comedy, and is friends with comedians who have more questionable material.It’s still a dumb take, but it doesn’t have to be directly related to his own output.
I mean, sure, but most of them are actively working!
Like I said, it’s still a dumb take.
Yes. Jerry’s an elder statesman of comedy, his friends are mostly comedians, and he hosts a show where he interviews comedians. I think the majority of his kvetching is on behalf of others and what he considers to be the art form at large. He himself barely ever said anything that would offend anyone even today.
Jerry Seinfeld has spent more than 20 years watching Larry David prove that he’s who everyone thought Jerry Seinfeld was while watching Seinfeld. And that existential crisis has hounded him more and more each day as everyone cheers on Larry David being both edgy AF and also not a sh**bird pedo like Jerry Seinfeld is.
I would be incredibly surprised if there were people who watched Curb Your Enthusiasm and concluded that Larry David is who everyone thought Jerry Seinfeld was while watching Seinfeld. I guess time is a flat circle and it’s easy to lose context when you watch things after they originally aired, but the premise of Curb was here’s the guy George Costanza was based on enjoying the success from creating Seinfeld with only a fraction of the fame getting into one mess after another.I adore Curb, but I’m absolutely bewildered by the pass some people give for the problematic content in even later seasons and more broadly the general decline in quality of the second half of the series from the first half. A very cynical part of me thinks people are overlooking some elements to elevate it over Seinfeld’s (also uneven) nine-year run.
Speaking only for myself, if anything leads me to give him some benefit of the doubt it’s his public loathing of Trump, not anything relating to Seinfeld. It helps that I found most of the stuff more eye-rolly than outright offensive. Though if you have a particular example of like the worst thing on the show I’d be curious. My memory isn’t great.
There are two episodes where he uses the N-word. In one, he’s helping a rapper come up with lyrics. In the other, he’s repeating what a neo-Nazi said to him in the bathroom but someone overhears and gets angry at him, which leads to the final scene where he has to again repeat what the Neo-Nazi said, but instead of just saying, “the N-word” (which he also could have done the first time he said it) he clams up and refuses to repeat what the Neo-Nazi said. Those are both from the first six seasons though, so they aired a long time ago, but if I’m being honest, I don’t think the latter episode holds up very well because it displays an obliviousness in Larry that tested my suspension of disbelief. YMMV.
In the second half of the show, Larry repeatedly runs into gay couples and asks probing questions that agitate them, leading to people screaming at Larry. I’m not gay, so it’s not a case of me taking offense, but I did find it lazy for Larry and the writers to set up these situations more than once, and both times the scenes go very predictably. Larry’s the one who is theoretically supposed to be the butt of the joke for his own ignorance, but I thought the improv was really bad and forced the gay characters to go from zero to a hundred and (maybe inadvertently) come off as unreasonable and easily offended – both times, in two separate episodes. I don’t think either situation is “edgy” either.He has also hit other sensitive topics like LGBTQ+ children, children with autism, trans people, battered women’s shelters, and people with physical & mental disabilities. I get the impression that some people hold up the fact that he’s touched on these topics as proof that you can be “edgy” and funny. But with a few exceptions (shout out to Denise Handicapped), none of these storylines were very funny*, at least to me. It’s not that I was offended in any of these cases, or think that he shouldn’t have included these subjects, but they tended to not be very fleshed out, and I’m surprised that more people didn’t call him out on it.*And I should also point out that he’s had completely inoffensive storylines that I didn’t find funny either. The last six seasons have been very mixed for me. I want to be clear – I don’t think Larry David should be cancelled or anything remotely like that, and I understand that there’s a clear difference between some of the (IMO) lazy material Larry does on his fictional show and the lazy comments Seinfeld has made as himself in interviews. But like Jerry, I do think LD’s best work is behind him.
Thanks for taking the time to write all that. I think just about everyone I’ve talked to about the show agrees it lost a bit of the magic at some point.
Thanks! If you’ll indulge me, I want to elaborate on one example that “offended” me because I’m worried my last comment came off as concern trolling. There’s an episode where Larry dates a single mother to a child she says has autism. Larry suspects the child does not actually have autism, and is just rude. I am very close to some people on the autism spectrum, and am extremely sensitive to the suggestion, which I am seeing more and more often, that people are lying about having autism to excuse being an asshole. It’s a trigger for me (which is probably why I didn’t expand on it before).To Larry and the show’s credit, Jeff voices the “I know people with autism and they are kind and wonderful” disclaimer, and I’m pretty sure at one point the mother admits that her son hasn’t been diagnosed by a doctor, which lends credence to Larry’s suspicion. So, phew.But the payoff is that Larry pretends to have autism to defuse an interaction, in a scene that genuinely made me laugh (Larry quotes Rain Man in a perfect context). But it was hard not to imagine some people coming away from this thinking, “So people do fake having autism!” which would be bad enough, but using a kid and her single mom to set up the premise and then never following up with him rubbed me the wrong way. Especially because I know that if I wasn’t close to people on the spectrum, I would’ve defended this episode as not making a joke at their expense, while missing that it perpetuated a pretty harmful stereotype that seems to be even more prevalent today. That gives me pause.
I’m sorry but do you even understand the point of the show? Larry plays a “schlemiel” who points out things that people just take for granted or don’t question. It’s not him the improver or the character being “oblivious” it’s asking people to think instead of just blindly following cultural standards
Yes, I understand the “point” of the show. And if you think through the scenario in “The N-Word,” in the final scene, all Larry had to do was repeat the Neo-Nazi’s sentence and omit the n-word. It had nothing to do with following a cultural standard, and was about being afraid of the black man on the medical board. And this was during the season when he was living with a black family.Most other situations where Larry offends a minority group can also be easily explained by Larry being a wealthy, out-of-touch, old, white man, just like Jerry Seinfeld, who isn’t current on constantly-changing cultural standards, rather than making a statement that most people can relate to.It’s also absolutely on the quality of the improv, because to make any kind of comment on cultural norms, or to make audience members really think about them, the situations have to be presented at least somewhat convincingly. The people involved need to be believable, and IMO the quality of improv took a nosedive after season 6/7. Most guests and day players started acting much more cartoonish and just repeating what Larry said instead of reacting like normal people.
The joke was that he kept accidentally getting himself in trouble. If they had done the ending you’re suggesting then there would have been no final joke, which was him refusing to respond to the point of absurdity. I don’t believe he had any animosity towards the guy on the board he just didn’t want to be perceived as a bigot another time, considering all the trouble it caused in the first place (the doctor getting mad and shaving Jeff’s head).
Yes, I understand there would have been no final joke. I’m saying that I think the final joke is forced as hell, something I had a problem with a lot in the last six seasons. He wouldn’t have caused any animosity; he was asked to repeat what the bigot said verbatim, and substituting the actual word for “the N-word” was always an option.This has nothing to do with that episode, but Larry and the writers also outright repeated some storylines and jokes in the final three or four seasons, something Jerry was adamant about not doing on Seinfeld after Larry left. So I still reject the idea that Larry was the “true” genius behind Seinfeld, and that the show wasn’t the product of both of their creativity and hard work.
I didn’t care for the recent trans gag and I assume you’re referring to other LGBT related content. Tbf it’s like South Park where he attacks everybody, not like he’s specifically targeting a community
I never thought he was specifically targeting anyone, but the show’s jokes didn’t always land when they kind of needed to.
Maybe not in a literal “who is the character” way, but in a “who is the main comedic talent behind Seinfeld the sitcom” way. You’d assume it’s Jerry Seinfeld because it’s his name on the show, but based on their careers afterwards and even just the years they did with and without David, it’s pretty obvious that it wasn’t Jerry bringing the lion’s share. The worst season of Curb is better than anything Seinfeld’s done on his own since., except maybe some CiCGC episodes with particularly kinetic guests.
“more broadly the general decline in quality of the second half of the series from the first half.”THANK you. I don’t recall ever talking to anyone else who felt that way, too. There is a distinct dividing line for me. Season 5 was the last truly great season of the show, season 6 and on was a mixed bag, at best, and unfunny and forced at worst. Except Leon. Leon rules.
“Dude never was in any danger of being too fucking edgy, blue, or controversial”I don’t know, man. Surely “what’s the deal with airplane food” got the airline industry right where it hurt!
Those jokes aren’t funny. My dad was a pre-packaged airline meal, and he doesn’t deserve that kind of mockery.
NOT ALL AIRLINE FOOD!(The food on British Airways is actually pretty decent!)
Right in the peanuts?
Maybe that’s what present-day Jerry is complaining about. It’s not wokeness–he’s mad airlines can’t serve peanuts anymore.
He must really like those peanuts.
Whatever’s grinding Seinfeld’s gears, I don’t think it’s the death of the network sitcom. Someone else suggested that he’s upset that Michael Richards lost his career, and I think that might be the right track. Not Richards specifically (he seems very at peace with what happened and has made it clear that he’s not asking for forgiveness from anyone who doesn’t believe he deserves it), but he’s friends with a lot of stand-up comedians, and he might think he’s taking a stand for, say, Dave Chappelle and Bill Burr. The comics with actually controversial material.
He’s so at peace with it that he’s hawking his new book on every major media outlet that will have him
Because that’s how book tours work.
If you’re not asking for forgiveness you don’t go on a book tour telling everyone how sorry you are
He’s on a tour for the most notable thing he’s done since his racist meltdown. People have been directly asking him questions about his rant. He says he’s sorry, but that he understands that there are people who will never forgive him. So like I said before, he’s not asking for forgiveness “from anyone who doesn’t believe he deserves it.” The public isn’t a monolith.
Right. So he’s on a book tour and giving interviews telling everyone how sorry he is. Again, that is not the action of a man at peace with his actions; it’s a guy who wants back in and knows he has to be savvy about it.
Again, I think that’s the action of a man who is promoting his book being asked about the same thing by everyone who interviews him, and him not avoiding it. He’s 75 years old, recovering from cancer, and talks about how he was never comfortable being “in” in the first place. We can disagree about his motivations, but I’m struggling to imagine a publisher putting out this book and not asking the author to go on tour to promote it.
Except nobody is questioning the motivation of the publisher? What are you talking about?
He’s on a book tour because he wrote a book. All of these interviews where he’s “saying he’s sorry” are only being scheduled to promote the book. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t think someone “at peace” with what happened would “go on a book tour telling everyone how sorry you are.” Are you suggesting that if he was really at peace, he would go into these interviews and just refuse to apologize for it again? Or not address his racist tirade at all? Because I’m saying that writing a book and not doing a book tour probably was never an option, and that interviewers were going to ask him about that incident no matter what.
I don’t know why you keep trying to explain to me why he’s doing a book tour by saying he wrote a book. You consistently refuse to engage with my main point, which is that if he was serious about not wanting forgiveness, he wouldn’t do any of this. He could have just…not written a book.
I’ve engaged with your main point. I just don’t agree with it.
So you think he’s writing a book and going on a media tour out of the goodness of his heart? Come on now.
I think there are more reasons why he would write a book than “wants people who will never forgive him to forgive him” and “the goodness of his heart.” Most celebrities do it for a quick buck. But I think he’s only on the media tour to promote his book.
You keep commenting about the media tour like the reason for it isn’t staggeringly obvious. I’m not even sure why you’re replying at this point.
I keep commenting about the tour because up until two comments ago, you seemed to have no problem with the fact that he wrote a book to begin with, only the fact that he’s doing interviews. You asked me if I think “he’s writing a book and going on a media tour out of the goodness of his heart,” so yes, I addressed the tour again. I keep replying because you have mischaracterized my point several times and I will continue to reply until you acknowledge that I never said or implied that Richards was not asking for forgiveness at all. I said he’s not asking forgiveness from people who don’t believe he deserves forgiveness in the first place. I think he’s saying that he’s sorry in these interviews because he’s genuinely sorry and knows that he hurt people, but knows that he can’t ever take back the vile and atrocious words he used.TL;DR You think he wrote a book to get back into Hollywood; I don’t. Simple as that. I’m not sure why you’re replying at this point either.
I mean if you wanna be gullible I guess I can’t stop you. But you don’t orchestrate this kind of big PR push and sojourn around with major media outlets for weeks on end if you have no intention of undoing the damage that’s been done to your career.
But you do if you’re selling a book though. Remember when Matthew Perry wrote a book and everyone lost their minds? If you believe that the only reason Michael Richards had to write a book was so he could orchestrate a “big” (I mean I guess) PR push and sojourn around with major media outlets for weeks on end to undo the damage that’s been done to his career, then nothing I say is ever going to sway you. You keep replying to me with hostility because I don’t see the situation the same way as you do, but you refuse to consider any possibility other than what you’ve already decided is true.Of course he’s undoing the damage to his image. He’s going to die soon, and he doesn’t want to leave his legacy tarnished for his family. His estate will continue collecting royalties he’s owed for his likeness, and he doesn’t want to leave less money to his family because people felt guilty for supporting Kramer. I never said he doesn’t care about his image at all. It doesn’t mean he hasn’t done the work in his private life, and it doesn’t mean he wants to return to anything.But if he met someone like you, I don’t think he would argue with you or get defensive. I think he’d say he understands and would leave. I can’t possibly know that for sure, but that’s the impression I got when he said he’s at peace and isn’t seeking forgiveness from people who don’t want to forgive him.Do you see that you keep arguing a point that I’m not making?
best I can say is he did catch flak for a “gay french king” joke in 2015; maybe the slight heat he caught for a lousy throw-away line broke his brain.
Bingo. He got flak from his kids on that specific joke, and he’s had a bug up his ass since exactly then.It’s incredibly sad watching him and Maher and others curdling into their own generation’s versions of senior, no-longer-with-it Bob Hope, Milton Berle, etc., railing in their old age against *the audiences* for not finding them funny anymore.
I think this is it
“What’s the deal with me not being able to use the n-word or the f-word anymore?”- Probably Jerry Seinfeld’s next special
Is he talking about himself or all his other rich friends? (Chris Rock, Chappelle, Rogen, etc.)
He doesn’t seem to get his main success was by being just a goofy little guy and the anger and ego are the main reason that he doesn’t work anymore. Adam Sandler still has tons of movies. Seinfeld’s stuff about a “real man” was weird too, even he admitted he was hardly a he-man
I think that’s part of why it’s hard not to read “something else,” something far uglier, into this kind of whining. Seinfeld did a network sitcom 30 years ago and mostly works clean. He is clearly intimately familiar with having to work within limits on content. Now, there is slightly more pushback on racist and homophobic material than there used to be, and sudden those limits are a huge problem that is suffocating comedy? Fuck outta here…
I’d take Selena in a second over a sequel to Trump.And that’s why Veep had to end—they tried to create the worst possible electable politicians and got eclipsed by reality.
There’s so much of Trump’s…tenure…as POTUS that is Ianuccian, but perhaps the best bit was the cherry on top of the whole shebang: Four Seasons Total Landscaping. It’s the perfect blend of arrogance, pathos, hubris, outright stupidity, and sheer wheels-have-come-the-fuck-off-ness of Veep or ITL.I bet Ianucci watched it thinking “No fucking way I could’ve come up with this”.
I’ve never gotten around to watching ‘Veep’, but I saw a fair bit of ‘The Thick of It’, Ianucci’s take on British politicking, and what I always found both hilarious and deeply depressing was the pettiness of the characters. So many of these “moves” are made out of spite, small-mindedness and a desperate attempt to find quick solutions to major problems.And that’s Trump and his goon squad all over. A bunch of shabby, unimpressive people making stupid decisions because they don’t have the foresight for anything else.
I can’t recommend Veep enough.
It really is kind of amazing how Seinfeld thinks that PC wokeness has killed television comedy when Veep and Curb, shows featuring his former collaborators, both had some of the most non-PC, un-woke content and just recently left the air each after long, critically acclaimed and commercially successful runs. What the fuck is he even talking about?
In Curbs case, Larry was “grandfathered in”, so it doesn’t count. Nothing counts really, other than what he wants to count. It’s really not “wokes” fault that NBC doesn’t do Thursday night comedy blocks anymore. It’s the changing tv landscape.
Also there are things so absurd that are now reality that were just jokes when the show was on the air.When Jonah was campaigning for president and got a lot of people worked up about numbers, because the were Arabic in origin, I thought it was pure satire. Apparently some idiots are actually like that.
Is anyone surprised it’s the female comedian that better understands what’s happening in comedy than the male comedian?
“That’s” nice.
As if I couldn’t have a bigger crush on her already…
“The true threat to art and the creation of art is the consolidation of money and power.” is the better headline for this. But it feels like part of the AV Club agenda is taking down a celebrity a day.
I can see why it’s laid out as it is – and it sounds like the person interviewing Dreyfus made the Seinfeld connection explicit – but I certainly agree that this quote is the most important takeaway from all this.
Of course Julia is gonna say what she said. She and Jerry are old heads and friends. At least she still does interesting things and sounds like she wants to learn and grow and seems somewhat interested in humanity. She seems like an actual artist who wants to make stuff unlike Jerry, who just wants to drive around like Jay Leno with comics from fifty years ago and make movies about bees and pop tarts.
I loved VEEP SO MUCH. Bonus she was like a Barbie with her beautiful clothes. So happy that JLD led a vehicle worthy of her talents. But I think of that last scene with Gary being taken away all the time. Heartbreaking. They were such a good pair. Lightning in a bottle.
We deserved a Jonah spinoff. Or maybe a Dan spinoff where he is forced to serve Jonah on another run for the White House.Too late now. Dan is on Law and Order.
no, the threat to art is coming hard from the left. racial quotas, sensitivity readers, no “punching down”, and she made millions being politically incorrect, unless I watched another show called VEEP.the progressive/social justice left have swallowed theatre, that I can easily attest to and prove. they’ve called for moratoriums on producing certain “identities” and will fucking name and shame you if your work isn’t diverse enough. hundreds of theatre professionals and teachers signed an open letter calling for men not to be able to be critics for works done by women and POC because of debunked implicit bias bullshit. hundreds of them. and they have money and power.the people in theatre with power are all social justice Jim Jones acolytes. it’s dead.in film, your work can’t be considered for best picture without meeting a strict racial quota system. this shit is everywhere. stuntmen have been “diversified” and unqualified people have been hired and fucking died because of it.she’s a fucking billionaire who spent her life doing “mean” comedy. she’s talking about her fucking self and doesn’t have a fucking clue. the social justice crowd see an opening and they take over entire art forms. they did it with comics and film and TV and theatre and video games. she needs to step out of her fucking mansion and maybe watch some VEEP or perhaps reruns of the show that made her fucking famous. this is total, obvious, craven, out of touch horseshit.
People not liking your art isn’t a threat to it dummy, it’s just the regular old free market of ideas. Everyone has to deal with the consequences of people possibly disliking what they have to say.
You know what is a threat to art though is you: “I WANT TO TAKE FEE SPEEHC RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” you screamed. YOU are the threat.
Your entire post amounts to complaining about people you don’t like also having the right to free speech and association. You are a tyrant as always.
“the people in theatre with power are all social justice Jim Jones acolytes.”
But you, who claims to work in the theater industry, also think your bosses would be just fine if they saw the kind of shit you posted. Hmmmm…..
No none can “take over” art unless the people consuming the art like what they are doing, maybe take a clue from that.
People AREN’T consuming it, but studios keep making it anyway. Look at Disney’s historic streak of underperforming movies over the past 2 years, for example. They just refuse to learn.
Underperforming doesn’t mean no one is consuming it. it means fewer people than they expected are consuming it. Let me know when Disney goes out of business, LOL.
uh huh, it’s just people not liking your art. and racial quotas. and calls for segregation (again) between artist and critics. and hundreds of artists signing an open letter calling people racist for a lukewarm review. And a diversity hire stuntperson being killed. and the academy awards using quotas. and theatres being harassed. and actors ADs and playwrights being fired or losing opportunities and and and…get a fucking life.
If a private group wants to have qualifications about something, that’s what they like about art ad that is their right to free speech and association. You hate people’s rights and want to take them away from people.
Yes, all that stuff qualifies as people not liking your art doofus.
cool, so you’re down with no jews allowed golf courses? no blacks allowed spaces? cool. cool cool cool.and no, none of that shit boils down to PeoPLe NOt LIkInG YoUr ArT. they are discriminatory and racist policies. fucking duh. it has nothing to do with the art but everything to do with the fucking totally unimportant race/identity of the artist. you’re a fucking racist.
If by “cool with it” you mean I understand and accept that they have a right to do so yes. Just like I’m “cool with” the KK marching down the street. Cool with it in an ACLU kind of way. You want to imply a moral acceptance on my part because if you didn’t have straw men and GBA, you’d have nothing to fucking say.
You on the other hand, scream about wanting to take people’s right away.
And yes, it does boil down to people not liking your art, and having basic human rights. Sorry that offends you, but you are absolute garbage.
“ it has nothing to do with the art”
That sure is your opinion!
“you’re a fucking racist.”
You know you can’t give a single example of anything I’ve said that supports that claim. You are a liar as always.
i’m fine with the kkk marching. i’m not fine with race/identity being a fucking factor in hiring, which is fucking illegal. derrrrrrrrrrryou back/ignore/excuse racism from the left. that’s not GBA, that’s your official fucking stance: that it’s not happening. i’ve sent you a boatload of evidence to the contrary, and you still deny it. yours is not a principled, logical position; it is pure gatekeeping for actual racists who want discrimination, segregation, censorship, etc.get a fucking life.
It’s not illegal for the Academy to have standards for their awards, we’ve been over this. NOTHING ILIEGAL IS HAPPENING. I know you think the only way minorities can get work is with breaking the law because you are a massive cunt.
“you back/ignore/excuse racism from the left.”
I literally show the things you claim ARE NOT REAL. Not feeding your delusion is not “supporting racism”. YOU ARE FUCKING SDELUSIONAL AND THE FACT SHOW IT. Yet another fail on your part.
“ i’ve sent you a boatload of evidence”
AND I FUCKING DESTOYED SO MUCH OF IT I NEVER NEED TO CONSIDER ANYTHING YOU SAY AGAIN. EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WORTHLESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CREDIBILITY ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON WHO CANNOT READ TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR CAUGHT IN SEVERAL FUCKING LIES WITH REGARDS TO YOUR “EVIDENCE” ALL OF WHICH WERE FUCKING DETAILED.
My position is both principled and logical, again, YOU are the one who has been shown OVER AND OVER to be unable to use logic (hence the King debate you abandoned because you lost), or to be just lying your ass off (like saying someone’s academic freedom was violated when the hearing found the opposite).
YOU are the one who WANTS ACTUAL CENSORSHIP. YOU ARE A CENSOR RETARD, THATS WHAT YOU ARE IF YOU WANT TO TAKE PEOPLE’S RIGHTS AWAY DUMMY.
YOU ARE THE LIVING EMBODIMENT OF “ARE WE THE BADDIES” EXCEPT YOU ARE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO HAVE A REALIZATION. THE BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU.
the fucking supreme court found that Yale discriminated against whites and asians. it is fucking illegals per the equal rights act of 1963 you fucking numbskull to discriminate in hiring by race, but people are fucking pussies and don’t sue as they will be (and have been) called waaaaaaacccciiiisssssstsss. you’ve disproven jack shit. i’ve given you the names dates and fucking named the work of the theorists that want to destroy the liberal order and you bitch and moan about systemic racism. tell me, will it be necessary per their work to destroy the liberal order to get rid of “systemic racism”? YES. THEY FUCKING SAY SO AND YOU KNOW IT.I’VE GIVEN YOU YALE LECTURERS TALKING ABOUT SHOOTING WHITE PEOPLE IN THE FUCKING HEAD. I’VE GIVEN YOU A PROFESSOR TEACHING HIS CHILDREN TO BE FUCKING RACIST. I’VE GIVEN WORK AFTER WORK CALLING FOR THE FUCKING END OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND YOU JUST QUIBBLE AND SQUIRT. THEY FUCKING TEACH RACISM IN SCHOOL, DIPSHIT. THEY LITERALLY FUCKING TEACH—PER PAPERS AND LESSON PLANS AND FUCKING SYLLABI I’VE FUCKING PROVIDED—THAT WHITES ARE OPPRESSORS AND BLACKS ARE WEAK FUCKING VICTIMS. ENTIRE BOOKS ARE WRITTEN ABOUT IT AND YOU KNOW IT. WHITE FRAGILITY RING ANY FUCKING BELLS? I COULD GO ON BUT YOU’VE BELCHED ON IT ALL, CALLED IT NOT GOOD ENOUGH, BECAUSE YOU ARE A FUCKING PROGFUCKED BRAIN FART.GET A FUCKING LIFE. KILL YOURSELF.
Again, the Academy having standards for their awards is not discrimination ins hiring. It’s really pathetic that you constantly deflect from the facts.
YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL TWAT IMAGINING NARRATIVES AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR CAUGHT IN SEVERAL FUCKING LIES WITH REGARDS TO YOUR “EVIDENCE” ALL OF WHICH WERE FUCKING DETAILED. EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WORTHLESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CREDIBILITY ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON WHO CANNOT READ TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. YOUR BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU.
the academy’s rules have already led to discriminatory hiring, including the case of hiring an inexperienced stunt woman…who fucking died. and i love that you think that just because something is legal it is moral. big brain.i haven’t lied about the boatload of evidence i’ve sent you. fuck, just the teaching of white fragility alone proves the case. fucking D’Angelo doesn’t think white women should cry in front of black people because it’s oppressive. you’ve forever lost that case.what did the professor mean when he said he had to teach his sons to be suspicious of white people lest their bodies get broken, cunt???
Klan rallies have led t violence too, it doesn’t matter what people’s rights might lead to, that’s on the people that do those things.
“ i love that you think that just because something is legal it is moral.”
Literally a thing I have never said and a great example of GBA. All I have ever fucking said is that it is a legal exercise of their first amendment rights, which, you allow the KKK more than the Academy of Motion Pictures. Great job. You are a FUCKING TYRANT AND CENSOR.
Yes, you have fucking lied, numerous times and then got all hissy like details don’t’ matter. They fucking do if you are honest asshole and you have misrepresented the facts OVER AND OVER and I have detailed it with links and evidence EVERY FUCKING TIME.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
You lied and said an article was written by a rabbi when it didn’t even quote one.You lied and said I support racial quotas.You lied and called an opinion piece a study.You lied and claimed something was a “Direct quote from diversity statement requirement” when it was from a list of things for hiring managers to consider when deciding if they are going to ask for diversity essays.You lied about what classes are teaching.You lied and claimed someone wanted to change the constitution and then tried to prove that with a source that explicitly stated they wanted to work within the constitution.You lied and inserted a word into a quote that didn’t exist.You lied and claimed Harvard’s entire graduation ceremony is segregated when in fact it’s just “special graduate recognition ceremonies” that take place prior too and separately from the actual graduation and are open to everyone.You lied about a professor teaching a class on Chinese language and being destroyed when neither of those things were true.You lied about academic freedom being violated when a hearing specifically found that wasn’t true.You lied about things the media said.You lied about what articles said.You lied about what videos said.You lied about what I said.You lie fucking CONSTANTLY.
i fucking sent you one by a rabbi, retard, i have it right here.you obviously support the academy’s racial quotas.i’ve sent you a bazillion fucking studies and you send me opinion pieces all the fucking time.i sent you a diversity statement with requirements, YOU DON’T FUCKING READ LINKS, THERE’S NO WAY YOU CAN, YOU RESPOND TOO FUCKING QUICKLY.i sent you fucking syllabi and class lessons about white fragility, white psychodrama, white oppression…YOU DON’T READ THEM, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE, YOU RESPOND TOO FUCKING FAST, FRAUD.BULLSHIT, KENDI WANTS TO CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION. YOUR READING COMPREHENSION IS RETARD LEVEL. HE WANTS TOTAL AUTHORITY TO SUPERCEDE THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION RETARD.I NEVER SAID IT WAS ENTIRELY SEGREGATED, I SAID AND POSTED ARTICLES ABOUT SEGREGATED CEREMONIES, LIAR ASSHEAD RETARD WHO DOESN’T READ ANYTHING BECAUSE YOU REPLY TO FAST.THE PROFESSOR HAD TO GO TO FUCKING THERAPY AND THERE WAS A FUCKING OUTRAGE AND DEMANDS FOR HIS JOB. YOU THINK THAT WAS LOVELY? YOU FUCKING FRAUD.BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH.GET A FUCKING LIFE.
https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/jews-in-hollywood-kanye-west-dave-chappelle-rabbi-explains-1234645366/https://careerservices.upenn.edu/application-materials-for-the-faculty-job-search/diversity-statements-for-faculty-job-applications/#:~:text=In%20general%20terms%2C%20diversity%20statement,diversity%2C%20equity%2C%20and%20inclusion.https://philarchive.org/rec/BRIWPhttps://www.politico.com/interactives/2019/how-to-fix-politics-in-america/inequality/pass-an-anti-racist-constitutional-amendment/“The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.”GEE, TOTAL CONTROL OVER STATE, LOCAL, AND FEDERAL EVERYTHING. HOW CONSTITUTIONALhttps://www.thenation.com/article/society/breonna-taylor-was-murdered-for-sleeping-while-black/YOU ARE SOOOO FUULLLL OF FUCKING SHEEEEEEEEEEEEITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTMURDERED FOR SLEEPING WHILE BLACK. FUCK YOU.KILL YOURSELF.
“ Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution”
THANKS FOR PROVING ME RIGHT YET AGAIN. YES, ANYTHING IS CONSTITUTIONAL IF IT’S IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUION DUE TO THE PROCESS LAID OUT THERE RETARD.
THE FUCKING DOA WOULD HAVE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY OVER ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAW, YOU FUCKING MONGOLOID. IT WOULD UPEND DEMOCRACY. GEE, IT’S ALMOST AS IF YOU CAN TOTALLY FUCKING BYPASS THE CONSTITUTION WITH THAT KIND OF POWER. MUY CONSTITUTIONAL.
It would not upend democracy, and again, would be constitutional if passed as an amendment. That’s working within the Constitution. KEEP LOSING YOUR MIND OVER FACTS THOUGH.
“the academy’s rules have already led to discriminatory hiring, including the case of hiring an inexperienced stunt woman…who fucking died.”
Surely you are not talking about Joi Harris who was a) qualified and more importantly b) died SEVEN YEARS before the Academy implemented it’s rules, which only started applying this year?
LOL who am I kidding, of course that’s who you are talking about, because you MISREPRESENT EVERYTHING. Thanks for another example of why everyone can safely dismiss any “evidence” you present.
YOU BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU BE ACCURATE.
And a huge LOL at your idea that hiring a black woman to do stunts for a black actress is some kind of DEI move instead of MAKING PERFECT SENSE.
so i got the dates wrong. i don’t have ALL THE FREE TIME YOU APPARENTLY DO to shitpost. she was a diversity hire. the producers said so. the stunt coordinator said she was unqualified. she fucking died. case fucking closed.https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/8/24/16189896/deadpool-2-stunt-fatality-joi-sj-harris-update.“Much of THR’s reporting is attributed to an anonymous production source who claims to have walked off the set due to increasing concerns with the decision to use Harris for the stunt. The source, a stunt performer who’d been training Harris, told THR that multiple members of the stunt crew had concerns about Harris’s inexperience as a stunt performer, and that at least one of them took their concerns to producers, only to be ignored. THR’s report also cites veteran stunt performer Conrad Palmisano, who is not filming Deadpool 2 and was not on set that day but claims to have spoken to several stunt crew members who echoed the anonymous performer’s allegations. “The stunt coordinators caved to the pressure. All the stunt people could do was take it to their higher-ups,” he told THR.”nice try, she was pure DEI. THE END.and of fucking course this is happening, i’ve already documented it in theatre. you think people don’t want to win best picture?you’re an obstinate jerkoff ideologue who is outside reality. get a fucking life,
IT DOESN’T TAKE TIME TO BE ACCURATE, YOU JUST HAVE TO GIVE A SHIT ABOUT FACTS AND YOU DON’T. IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACADEMIES RULES. IT HAPPENED YEARS BEFORE THAT. THE END.
LOL at you thinking because an anonymous source said so it must be gospel truth!
YOU ARE A LYING CUNT, A BIGOT, A TYRANT AND ABSOLUTE GARBAGE.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
The specific article YOU CLAIMED was written by a rabbi, was not and had nothing to do with a Rabbi. IT WAS A FUCKING LIE.
I do not support racial quotas anymore than you support white supremacy because you think the KK should be allowed to march. YOU ARE A LIAR WITH NOTHING TO SAY IF IT ISN’T A STRAW MAN OR GBA.
THE SPECIFIC LINK YOU CLAIMED WAS TO A STUDY WAS TO AN OPINION PIECE. THAT WAS A FUCKING LIE.
In the SPECIFIC INSTANCE I STATED, you lied and claimed something was a “Direct quote from diversity statement requirement” when it was from a list of things for hiring managers to consider when deciding if they are going to ask for diversity essays. IT WAS A LIE.
Bonus LOL at you complaining I don’t read links so you can feel better about being a loser on the facts. Love the irony given that YOU OBVIOUSLY DON”T READ YOUR OWN LINKS BECAUSE THEY AFTEN DESTROY YOU. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I SPECIFICALLY PROVED THE PERSON YOU CLAIMED WANTED TO DESTROY THE CONSTITUTION WANTED TO WORK WITHIN IT. YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR WHO MISREPRESENTS EVERYTHING, THE EVIDENCE IS ENORMOUS.
YOU ABSOLUTLY DID SAY IT WAS ENTIRELY SEGREGATED AND THAT WAS A FUCKING LIE BECAUSE YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR LYING CONSTANTLY.
AGAIN, YOU HAD THE FUCKING FACTS WRONG ABOUT THE TEACHERS LIKE YOU HAVE THE FACTS WRONG ALL THE FUCKING TIME BECAUSE YOU DON’T KNOW JACH SHIT. ALL YOU HAVE IS BRAIN WORMS.
NO I FUCKING DON’T. THE TEACHING OF WHITE FRAGILITY ALONE IS ENOUGH, BUT I’VE SENT YOU SYLLABI ABOUT WHITE PSYCHODRAMA, WHITE IGNORANCE, WHITE VIOLENCE, ETC. YOU TWIST IT INTO muH sTruCtuRAl rAciSM WHEN THESE LESSONS ARE OBVIOUSLY AND NOTORIOUSLY ANTI-WHITE. FUCKING DEAL WITH IT, YOU ARE A PROGFUCKED MENTAL AND MORAL MIDGET WHO CANNOT HANDLE THE FACT THAT SOMEONE WOULD HAVE THE AUDACITY TO CALL OUT ANTI-WHITE RACISM BECAUSE YOU. ARE. JUST. LIKE. THE. NEO-RACISTS.
YOU SEND ME SHIT THAT USES THE WORD OPPRESSION IN THE DESCRIPTION AND DECIDE THAT MEANS THEY TEACH ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE ACTIVLY OPPRESSING ALL BLACK PEOPLE. SCHOOLS ARE NOT TEACHING WHAT YOU CLAIM AND THE SHIT YOU SEND DOES NOT SHOW WHAT YOU CLAIM. YOU HAVE FUCKING BRAIN WORMS.
they teach D’Angelo and Kendi, that should be enough, but i’ve fucking buried you in this shit, and you somehow insist that they aren’t teaching what we all plainly see playing out everyfuckingwhere. it’s a you problem. specifically that you’re a cheerleader for racism. great look.
They teach about systematic racism and you twist that into an anti-white conspiracy because you are a moron with brain whos who’s entire life and identity is wrapped around being a victim.
“what we all plainly see”
NO YOU. NOT ALL.
“specifically that you’re a cheerleader for racism”
LOL ANOTHER LIE! QUTOE ONE THING I SAID THAT DOES THAT. TELLING YOU YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG ISN”T BEING A CHEERLEADER FOR RACISM BTU YOU LOVE GBA!!!!!!!!
“i’ve fucking buried you in this shit”
No one is impressed with your Gish Gallop. The quality of your “evidence” is trash. Your sources do not support your claims and at half the time they CONTRADICT you. I doubt you read more than headlines.
yeah, have you read white fragility? how to be an anti-racist? the pedagogy of the oppressed? Marcuse? Bell? Crenshaw? if not, shut the fuck up. the fact that this shit is taught is all the proof in the fucking world. people literally condemning colorblindness and advocating for racial discrimination and calling all white people oppressors and racists. tuff titties.i say you support racism because you see nothing wrong with teaching this shit, or deny it’s happening. teaching white privilege is FUCKING RACIST. AND FUCKING STUPID. the average white person has NO FUCKING POWER.again: tough titties. you don’t know the work and admit you don’t read what i post.tell me again, who will break the boys’ bodies, dana???? i FUCKING DEFY YOU TO ANSWER.you are aware that a fucking speaker at Yale openly talked about shooting white people in the head, right? that’s not racism? you haven’t said a peep about that.you defend the racism of the professor teaching his children to not be friends with white people. this is why i say—correctly—that you support racism.christ, you’re a fucking bore.
“the fact that this shit is taught is all the proof in the fucking world”
If you have brain worms I’m sure that makes sense! For people with normal brains, that’s not how it works. Fact is, you have failed to show any of your anti-white conspiracy shit is real. Tuff titties.
“i say you support racism because you see nothing wrong with teaching this shit”
Because “this shit” isn’t the racist shit you claim it is. So again, all you have is that I don’t accept your conspiracy bullshit.
Teaching that white priviledge exists IS NOT RACIST YOU FUCKING RETARD.
“and admit you don’t read what i post.”
Oh look, another lie! I read what you post, research it, and then present the facts that destroy it. SO MANY TIMES.
“ i FUCKING DEFY YOU TO ANSWER.”
I DID AND YOU SAID I DID.
“you defend the racism of the professor teaching his children to not be friends with white people”
Quote that. When did I do anything other than tell you that you were wrong? TELING YOU THAT YOU ARE ARETARD MIRED IN CONSPIRACY IS NOT SUPPORTING RACISM DIPSHIT.
Again, you have nothing supporting your claim that I support racism in any way.
“christ, you’re a fucking bore.”
IF THAT WERE TRUE YOU WOULD NEVER RESPOND TO ME AGAIN BUT WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP.
of fucking course teaching it is racist. it is generalizing and stereotyping based on race. it’s the definition of racism, and it’s not a fucking conspiracy when they teach D’IAngelo literally saying that white people oppress black people, dipshit. she says white people aren’t allowed to cry in front of black people because IT’S OPPRESSIVE. SHE FUCKING SAYS THAT ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST. YOU’RE FUCKING TOAST. THIS BOOK IS TAUGHT FUCKING EVERYWHERE. YOU HAVEN’T FUCKING READ THE TEXTS. THE PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED LITERALLY TEACHES TEACHERS HOW TO SUBVERT WESTERN SOCIETY.THE FUCKING NEW YORK TIMES SAID WE NEED TO DO AWAY WITH OPPRESSIVE WHITE VALUES LIKE OBJECTIVITY AND THE WORSHIP OF THE WRITTEN WORD, ESSENTIALLY CALLING BLACK PEOPLE FUCKING EMOTIONAL IDIOTS. THE SMITHSONIAN DID THE SAME FUCKING THING. REMEMBER THAT???https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article244309587.htmlDID THIS HAPPEN, ASSHAT? IS IT A CONSPIRACY????? NO, THIS IS WHAT IS TAUGHT, DICKHEAD.GET FUCKED. YOU’RE DONE.
It’s not racist you dummy because it isn’t talking about white people, it’s talking about how our systems were set up for them and how as a result of hundreds of years of that, “whiteness” is often considered the default.
You claim to have read all these books, but your brain worms won’t let you understand anything in them or think any thought that isn’t you being a victim.
“SHE FUCKING SAYS THAT ALL WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST.”
SOUNDS LIKE KING RETARD.AGAIN, YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT PEOPLE MAKEING GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT WHITE PEOPLE BUT KING FUCKING DID IT AND YOU ARE JUST FUCKING FINE WITH HIM.
“THE PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED LITERALLY TEACHES TEACHERS HOW TO SUBVERT WESTERN SOCIETY.”
SOUNDS LIKE KING RETARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WAY TO SHOW WHAT A CONSERVATIVE YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
“THE FUCKING NEW YORK TIMES SAID WE NEED TO DO AWAY WITH OPPRESSIVE WHITE VALUES”
SOUNDS LIKE KING!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL TWAT IMAGINING NARRATIVES AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR CAUGHT IN SEVERAL FUCKING LIES WITH REGARDS TO YOUR “EVIDENCE” ALL OF WHICH WERE FUCKING DETAILED. EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WORTHLESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CREDIBILITY ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON WHO CANNOT READ TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. YOUR BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
“ YOU’RE DONE.” Is that what you tell yourself at night when you cry into your pillow about how I won’t stop hurting you with the bad nasty facts that destroy you? KEEP SUCKING THAT THUMB INFANT. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
you’ve fucking told me you don’t read what i post. I NEVER SAID YOU ANSWERED THAT QUESTION. YOU HAVEN’T.IF YOU THINK THE TEACHING OF WHITE FRAGILITY—WHICH, FUCKING AGAIN, YOU HAVEN’T READ—DOESN’T TEACH RACE HATRED, THEN I SUSPECT YOU EAT YOUR OWN SHIT.IF YOU THINK CLASSES ON WHITENESS THAT TEACH ABOUT WHITE TOXICITY, WHITE PSYCHODRAMA, WHITE IGNORANCE, AND MAJOR PUBLICATIONS SAYING THAT BASICALLY BLACK PEOPLE CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO WRITE AND READ CORRECTLY DON’T TEACH RACE HATRED…YOU EAT YOUR OWN SHIT.IF YOU THINK PROFESSORS TALKING ABOUT SHOOTING WHITE PEOPLE IN THE HEAD AND TEACHING THEIR KIDS NOT TO BE FRIENDS WITH WHITE PEOPLE LEST THEIR BODIES BE CRUSHED ISN’T TEACHING RACE HATRED…LOOK, YOU’RE EATING MORE OF YOUR OWN SHIT.YOU HAVEN’T “DEMOLISHED” KENDI, BELL, CRENSHAW, D’IANGELO, DELGADO, MARCUSE, FREIRE, ETC. YOU ARE IN FACT JUST EATING YOUR OWN SHIT.YOU EAT YOUR OWN SHIT.“WE’D BE DONE.” YOU SOUGHT ME OUT, DANA. I WASN’T REPLYING TO YOU ON THIS COMMENT SECTION, DANA. YOU HAVE A CHROME EXTENSION FOR ME, DANA. YOU ARE A FEMCEL STALKER EGGLESS DUNGEON CUNT, DANA.
Yeah, you did. Because I did answer your question.
“IF YOU THINK THE TEACHING OF WHITE FRAGILITY—WHICH, FUCKING AGAIN, YOU HAVEN’T READ—DOESN’T TEACH RACE HATRED”
What I think is that it sounds just like King talking about the same shit with regards to white people. But you can’t cope with that. YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL TWAT IMAGINING NARRATIVES AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR CAUGHT IN SEVERAL FUCKING LIES WITH REGARDS TO YOUR “EVIDENCE” ALL OF WHICH WERE FUCKING DETAILED. EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WORTHLESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CREDIBILITY ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON WHO CANNOT READ TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. YOUR BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU.
“I wasn’t replying to you” you say as you reply to me. OVER AND OVER. That’s how I fucking know that not only an I not boring, you know what I’m saying fucks you. It’s that cognitive dissonance that keeps you coming back.
Keep calling other people stalkers while you stalk multiple websites. Love your tired trope attempts at insults, way to reinforce why no one likes your plays – your writing is crap and you have zero creativity.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL TWAT IMAGINING NARRATIVES AGAINST YOU. YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR CAUGHT IN SEVERAL FUCKING LIES WITH REGARDS TO YOUR “EVIDENCE” ALL OF WHICH WERE FUCKING DETAILED. EVERYTHING YOU SAY IS WORTHLESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CREDIBILITY ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON WHO CANNOT READ TO UNDERSTAND ANYTHING. YOUR BRAIN WORMS WON’T LET YOU.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
“BECAUSE YOU. ARE. JUST. LIKE. THE. NEO-RACISTS.”
How’s that, exactly? Because I don’t accept your conspiracy bullshit that I researched and showed was fucking bullshit? Somehow that makes me a racist? That’s literaly the only example you were able to give of me having any of these illiberal positions you imagine.
THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS EMBRACED AN ILLIBERAL POSITION IS YOU WITH YOUR DESIRE TO USE THE GOVERNMENT TO CENSOR PEOPLE’S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.
AND YOU ARE STILL LYING ABOUT THE BREANNA TATLOR SHIT. YOU ARE FUCKING DISGUSTING.
“KILLED FOR SLEEPING WHILE BLACK.” WHERE’S THE FUCKING LIE, ASSHEAD?
THE PART WHERE YOU ACT LKE ANYONE INTENTIONALLY LIED. THAT WAS IN LINE WITH THE INFO AT THE TIME RETARD.
IT’S ALSO NOT THE ONLY LIE YOU TOLD ABOUT THE MEDIA. ALL YOU FUCKING DO IS LIE.
And seriously, who between us needs a life? I have friends and fun hobbies you try and make fun of me for because you are a jealous loser that no one likes. You stalk multiple websites that cater to people and topics you hate just to be an asshole troll. No one with a good life who is mentally stable does that. And you know whatever sad existence you have now would be destroyed if people saw who you really were.Your entire fucking life revolves around being a victim! You were a victim at work, your a victim of DEI, progressives are racist against you, it’s all the books you read. It’s YOUR WHOLE FUCKING LIFE. It’s so all consuming that you seek out multiple websites devoted to topics you hate just to troll. No one who feels the need to go to places they dislike to be an asshole is mentally well or having a good life. And no one who throws around racial and homophobic slurs like you do isn’t a bigot.
“ i don’t have ALL THE FREE TIME YOU APPARENTLY DO to shitpost.”“I shit on progressives all the time at Media Matters and I used to hit up NPR until they literally pussied out and got rid of their comment sections. I (carefully) shit on them on r/politics, r/toilet paper usa, r/white people twitter, all the usual regressive subreddits”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
YEAH, I DON’T DO ANY OF THAT ANYMORE. YOU’RE HERE 24/7. NO WAY YOU HAVE A FUCKING JOB.
YOU REPLY 40+ TIMES A DAY HOW DO YOU HAVE A JOB? YOU NEED TO MAKE THINGS UP ABOUT OTHERS TO FEEL LIKE LESS OF A LOSER. KEEP SUCKING THAT THUMB INFANT. YOU ARE ABSOLULTLY STALKING EVERY SITE YOU CAN.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
“Get a life” says the guy who spends his life stalking progressives on websites he hates just to be an asshole. No one with a good life who is mentally stable does that. And you know whatever sad existence you have now would be destroyed if people saw who you really were. Your entire fucking life revolves around being a victim! You were a victim at work, your a victim of DEI, progressives are racist against you, it’s all the books you read. It’s YOUR WHOLE FUCKING LIFE. It’s so all consuming that you seek out multiple websites devoted to topics you hate just to troll. No one who feels the need to go to places they dislike to be an asshole is mentally well or having a good life. And no one who throws around racial and homophobic slurs like you do isn’t a bigot.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
“Get a life” says the guy who spends his life stalking progressives on websites he hates just to be an asshole. No one with a good life who is mentally stable does that. And you know whatever sad existence you have now would be destroyed if people saw who you really were. Your entire fucking life revolves around being a victim! You were a victim at work, your a victim of DEI, progressives are racist against you, it’s all the books you read. It’s YOUR WHOLE FUCKING LIFE. It’s so all consuming that you seek out multiple websites devoted to topics you hate just to troll. No one who feels the need to go to places they dislike to be an asshole is mentally well or having a good life. And no one who throws around racial and homophobic slurs like you do isn’t a bigot.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY.
The Pew data you can’t cope with shows progressives are overwhelmingly liberal BECAUSE THEY HAVE LIBERAL VIEWS. They have overwhelmingly liberal views, and IN THE REAL WORLD THAT MEANS THEY ARE LIBERALS.Mewl all you want, it’s fucking settled:A) Being woke doesn’t require that you hate capitalismB) You can be both liberal and progressiveC) You are a delusional twat imagining narratives against youD) You are too stupid to know something is an ad, even when it explicitly states it in three placesE) Your idea of what a liberal is is completely personal and based on your own prejudices, not the actual meaning of the word the way the rest of the world uses it.F) You are the dumbest motherfucker in any room and have no ability to comprehend what you read.
You are still a pussy in denial. Redlining is explicitly racist and happening now. That is systematic racism. That’s in addition to the previous science you had a meltdown over after you bothered to pay attention to the proof YOU put forth and realized it all said you were wrong. THE FACTS AND EXPERTS SAY YOU ARE FUCKING WRONG YOUR MEWLING WILL NEVER CHANGE THAT. science > youLiberalism is defined by sources other than you or me. Someone’s words or positions either conform to that definition or they do not. You want to add exceptions to the definition and make it different for some undefined period of time. Without a source, that’s just your retarded opinion. You have to prove your context is relevant with a source. You can’t because it is not relevant and everything in the universe grasps that but you.The fact that King wanted reparations makes him a)NOT COLORBLIND and b)ILLIBERAL, according to the standards you put forth. Yes that is retarded because you and your standards are retarded. In order to be logically consistent you have to admit that either King isn’t liberal or the CRT proponents you vilify as illiberal (LIKE FUCKING JON STEWART) are just as liberal as he is for having the same views.You are a tyrant, a bigot, and a pathetic fucking joke.
FOR ALL OF ETERNITY I WILL REMIND YOU OF WHAT YOU SAID: SPEECH HAS NO EFFECT, PEOPLE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, PERIOD. YOU SAID IT. THE END.
IS THIS WHAT I’M FUCKING DONE WITH YOU LOOKS LIKE, AUTOMATOR? WE BOTH KNOW YOU CAN’T STOP. MR I ONLY POST THREE TIMES A DAY. YOU STALK MULTIPLE WEBSITES YOU HATE JUST TO TROLL. YOUR ENTIRE REASON FOR BEING HERE IS ME.LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLCHOKE ON THE TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE AND HYPOCRISY FOREVER.
NOTHING IS EVER GOING TO BE AS PATHETIC AS YOU LYING ABOUT WHO YOU ARE TO AVOID THE SHIT YOU SAID.I KNOW YOU KNOW YOU ARE A LOSER. THE FACT YOU HAD TO CHANGE ACCOUNTS AND LIE ABOUT WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU PREVIOUSLY SAID REALLY DRIVES THAT HOME.
YOU CAN’T EVEN RECOGNIZE AN ADVERTISEMENT WHEN IT CLEARLY STATES IT IS AN ADVERTISEMENT IN THREEE PLACES.The level of embarrassment you’ve caused yourself is fucking epic, I’ve never seen anything like it. Delicious.
KING WANTED REPARATIONS FOR BLACK PEOPLE. THAT IS SPECIAL TREATMENT BASED ON RACE. YOU SAID THAT WAS THE OPPOSITE OF COLORBLIND, RACIST, AND ILLIBERAL. YOU ALSO SAID SOCIALISTS CANNOT BE LIBERAL. KING WAS A SOCIALIST. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF HE WAS 99% LIBERAL, ANY ILLIBERAL VIEW MEANS HE’S A FILTHY PROG. THAT’S YOUR RETARDED STANDARD.
“I WANT TO TAKE FREE SPEECH RIGHTS AWAY FROM PEOPLE” THAT WAS YOU, HOW ARE YOU LIBERAL? YOU ARE AN ADMITTED LIAR, ADMITTED HYPOCRITE AND EXPLCITY ILLIBERAL. YOU ARE ABSOLUTE GARBAGE AND A BLIGHT ON HUMANITY. YOUR ENTIRE LIFE WOULD FALL APART IF THE PEOPLE IN IT SAW WHAT YOU POST HERE.
And seriously, who between us needs a life? I have friends and fun hobbies you try and make fun of me for because you are a jealous loser that no one likes. You stalk multiple websites that cater to people and topics you hate just to be an asshole troll. No one with a good life who is mentally stable does that.Your entire fucking life revolves around being a victim! You were a victim at work, your a victim of DEI, progressives are racist against you, it’s all the books you read. It’s YOUR WHOLE FUCKING LIFE. It’s so all consuming that you seek out multiple websites devoted to topics you hate just to troll. No one who feels the need to go to places they dislike to be an asshole is mentally well or having a good life. And no one who throws around racial and homophobic slurs like you do isn’t a bigot.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
“When I hear people starting to complain about political correctness—and I understand why people might push back on it—but to me that’s a red flag, because it sometimes means something else.”Even if not meaning something else, he could’ve worded it better, but probably true especially when the ultimate red flag pops up when the word “woke” makes its way into their response…of which a lot might be accredited to this dweeb and Fox for hijacking and oversaturating everyone by using it as a substitute for “PC”, though they couldn’t tell you what it meant.
It took me a good long while to realise how essential Dreyfus was to the ‘Seinfeld’ ensemble. George and Kramer are louder characters so it’s easier for the actors to grab attention, but a lot of the joy of Elaine was that, even though she was just as crazy ad the others, she had to present herself as more professional in the worlds she inhabited. Dreyfus was excellent at nailing that balance, the mostly in control but occasionally unhinged wild card of the group.
Anecdotally, whenever Seinfeld comes up in conversation I find people tend to be in two camps “I love it, so funny” or “I do not like Seinfeld, but Elaine was cool”.
She’s cool, she’ll be fine, she’s a billionaire’s daughter.
::reads grays; sees “youareonfire” losing his shit:: the social justice crowd see an opening and they take over entire art forms. they did it with comics and film and TV and theatre and video games. Huh. K.If you think that every piece of media in these spaces is dominated by “social justice” checkboxes, and that there isn’t a ton of more “traditional” content out there *along side* other stories, then you’re an absolute, gasping, weirdly apoplectic fucking moron.Comics have not been “taken over” because some variant covers feature queer artists. Film has not been “taken over” because there are trans characters in some movies.TV has not been “taken over” because gay themes exist on some shows.Theatre? FFS, look at what’s currently running on Broadway, you fucking tool. Tradition is doing just fine.Video games? L-O-fucking-L. Yeah, sure, the existence of Life is Strange sure is stopping the umpteenth military shooter from being released this year.SUMMARY: “youareonfire” is one weird, excitable fucking moron who could stand to go the fuck outside, it’s nice out.
This whole discussion turned into an exercise in circular reasoning when it comes to Jerry Seinfeld. I think that what he actually said is that it’s hard to make comedy in the modern social climate of finding XXXXX stuff offensive. So when we say he isn’t funny any more OR that his material is offensive, we’re just agreeing with him. There’s no reason to get mad at him OR try to prove him wrong OR to explain how he’s a terrible comedian.How many people here have noticed that the two discussion arguments–that Seinfeld’s a wimp because he never does any controversial material, and that his old shows are offensive–are in direct contradiction to each other?