Kristen Stewart almost bit her lip and the dust as the “Drew Barrymore” of Scream 4

Kristen Stewart turned it down and another star from a Vampire-based touchstone took the gig

Aux News Scream
Kristen Stewart almost bit her lip and the dust as the “Drew Barrymore” of Scream 4
Kristen Stewart, Drew Barrymore Photo: Phillip Faraone

[This article discusses the plot of the Scream series]

The Scream series first grabbed the world’s attention with an iconic opening sequence that sacrificed the film’s biggest star. Director Wes Craven’s gamble paid off, and critics praised his Hitchcockian bait-and-switch, which would become a lynchpin of the franchise.

Some opening kills fared better than others, though. Omar Epps and Jada Pinkett Smith make a four-course meal out of their date-night trip to a raucous screening of Stab in Scream 2. However, Scream 3’s Cotton Weary (Liev Schreiber), stuck in L.A. traffic as Ghostface murders his partner over the phone, yields less exciting results.

By the time Craven got to Scream 4, he knew that audiences were way ahead of him, so he and screenwriter Kevin Williamson went full-on meta, faking audiences out with faux-Scream openings via the in-universe Stab franchise. But it wasn’t always this way.

In a recent interview with Slant Magazine, queen of the vampires herself Kristen Stewart revealed that she was almost Scream 4's “Drew Barrymore,” its first scene casualty. However, she passed because she “can’t do a Drew.”

“It was just going to be one person, and I was like, ‘I can’t do a Drew. I can’t touch that,’” she said. “Then they ended up doing, if I’m remembering correctly, a larger sequence and not just one victim.”

K-Stew’s memory serves her well. For Scream 4, Craven and Williamson staged a more extensive, multi-part sequence featuring one Kristen and one Vampire-adjacent celebrity: Kristen Bell and Anna Paquin.

That doesn’t mean Stewart’s Scream days have come and gone. On the contrary, there’s still hope as long as Kristen Stewart continues to love Neve Campbell and Scream.

I would read the script. I love Neve Campbell so much. She was very nice to me, and it was very satisfying that she’s a very nice person. I love that movie. I’ve watched it recently, as an adult though. It’s so gnarly. I love the movie because it loves movies. The coolest part of Scream is what it says about film. It’s so self-aware. It folds in on itself like six times. I love how much [Wes Craven] loves movies and how embedded that is. It’s a total film nerd type of movie. It’s not just a flasher flick. It’s a beautiful movie. It’s so hard to watch. I’m like, “I don’t have the stomach for that shit anymore.” I was like, “Oh, man, this is very, very, very intense.”

12 Comments

  • lisarowe-av says:

    i was disappointed we didn’t get the big opening kill.just pretend she got stabbed in this gif.

  • frumpityfrump-av says:

    There were flashers in that movie?

  • gemma-loo-av says:

    I read this headline 4 times, and it still comes across as nonsense to me. Separately, I always felt bad for Cotton in 3. I wanted to see more of him!

    • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

      The . . .
      ah, you know . . .

    • triohead-av says:

      The headlien is a sub-commenter level joke about how Kristen Stewarts acting MO is to bite her lip. It would be hacky and tired down here among the slidewhistle comments.
      As a headline it’s even worse since it’s borderline unparseable.

  • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

    One of these “an actor didn’t take a part that another actor did.” Neat.

    • TRT-X-av says:

      Read the article, yo. It not only would have been a different actor…the scene would’ve played out differently.

  • westsidegrrl-av says:

    I love how much [Wes Craven] loves moviesWatching movies made by filmmakers who love movies is so much fun. You can almost feel their giddiness sometimes, setting up these absolutely crazy shots—Brian de Palma and Spike Lee are two others.

  • willoughbystain-av says:

    The film is pretty weak (although honestly probably better than the majority of horror sequels) but I think the opening of Scream 3 is actually pretty strong. Whereas I think Scream 4 is a better film, but the opening is just kind of annoying.

    • TRT-X-av says:

      The opening kill in 3 was great because it was the first time our victim was one of the survivors from a previous film. There was a chance they could survive with the wife being the only victim.It also immediately set the stakes for the film by establishing the killer could clone voices.But yeah, the opening to 4 sucked. It pulled the same trick one time too many and immediately turned me off. The newest did something similar and just…ugh. Too meta for its own good.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin