How Top Gun: Maverick star Monica Barbaro developed a pilot’s swagger

The actress reflects on the "incredible gift" of flight training from Tom Cruise

Film Features Top Gun: Maverick
How Top Gun: Maverick star Monica Barbaro developed a pilot’s swagger
Monica Barbaro as Phoenix in Joe Kosinski’s Top Gun: Maverick Photo: Paramount Pictures

As Top Gun: Maverick enters its second weekend in theaters, after giving Tom Cruise the biggest box office opening of his career, some of the conversation around the film is shifting to the performances from the ensemble of gifted young actors who surround Cruise. One of those stars is Monica Barbaro, who plays “Phoenix,” one of Pete “Maverick” Mitchell’s trainees. Barbaro—who had demonstrated versatility in small-screen roles on the Lifetime dramatic series Unreal, NBC’s Chicago Justice, and ABC’s Splitting Up Together—stands out in the film because of her thoughtful, understated authority.

As Phoenix, Barbaro represents a vital but often forgotten segment of service women who excel alongside their male counterparts. She spoke to The A.V. Club about her role, and the responsibility she and the filmmakers shouldered, to make this female character a true equal among peers. Barbaro also revealed the paces that Cruise and director Joe Kosinski put the cast through to give them the confidence—down to their walk to and from the planes—to play pilots, and talked about what she hopes to tackle next.


The A.V. Club: Your character, Phoenix, is the sole female pilot in the group. What kind of responsibility does that carry?

Monica Barbaro: Yeah, it was such an interesting challenge. I thought it was necessary, and I think we all thought it was necessary to represent women in some specific way where every woman in the world feels represented by this one character—and ultimately we realized that’s absolutely impossible. And then you start to look at it like, no, she’s a character. She’s another naval aviator amongst this group. And I was lucky to have some incredible pilots to learn from in that respect. And I asked them those questions and they said the same thing—“We’re just striving for the day when we’re not female aviators, but we’re just aviators.” And everybody in our production team, Tom [Cruise], Joe [Kosinski], Jerry [Bruckheimer], me, the Navy, everyone cared immensely about having her be shown as a strong, capable pilot who you would trust with your life.

That was made easy [through] the actual pilots that I met who were definitely the kinds of people that we sourced a lot of information to develop this character with. And also just the relationships she has with different people, like her very strong, loyal relationship with Rooster, where she expects the most out of him. And meeting Bob and not necessarily trusting him at first, and then they build a really good bond where they start to stick up for each other. And her feelings on Maverick are like, “Ha ha, who is this guy?” But then immediately being like, “Oh, no, he’s going to give us everything we need to get this done.” So those became the things that I focused on.

AVC: Typically in male-dominated environments we see tough female characters sometimes overcompensating. But there’s a confidence in your performance that’s really fun to watch. You seem to make her an equal as opposed to a competitor.

MB: You’re absolutely right. That was something in the first pass of the script, and in the audition I did, more of that overcompensation look—and it was very fun to play. It’s very outside of who I am, so it was fun. But it also just didn’t feel authentic to the character or to the women that I met and I was flying with. And so hats off to again the production team to be like, we want her to look like someone who just knows she’s really good and her competitive level is the same as the guys’. Like it’s not overt. It’s not aggressive in some way that she thinks she has to be, just to get by. She just knows she’s really, really good at this this thing. She just stands tall because of it.

AVC: You’ve talked about some of the relationships, between you and Rooster, for example. How explicit were those in the script?

MB: We always were told that the backstory of Rooster and Phoenix is that they were in flight school together. She’s known him for a really long time. I think they’re both the kind of people who don’t push in terms of they’re more humble about their abilities, and they formed a bond really early because I think it was pretty clear they could trust each other. And somewhere along the way, they met Hangman, who they discovered pretty quickly that they could not trust. And that means the world to a pilot. Having each other’s back means everything when you’re up there and you know that you guys can support each other.

AVC: All of the actors in the film do a great job conveying a sense of self-assuredness. How difficult was it to develop that sense of confidence, in and out of the cockpit?

MB: Well, it started by receiving this incredible gift as an actor from Tom, which was this all-encompassing flight training program. He sort of gave us backstory in that we spent all this time learning how to fly a basic aircraft, takeoffs, landings, all of that, the lingo. We moved on to an aircraft that was doing aerobatics and we sustained G’s and learned not to pass out and all that during maneuvers. So we would practice maneuvers that would be in the script, like I learned what a split ‘S’ was, which is something he pulls in the first movie—and, like, did one. And then we got to dogfight in L-39s. So by the time we got to the jet, we had a lot of information and we knew what these things sort of felt like. And that was worth its weight in gold. I mean, we had to re-film the scene where we’re walking into the bar, because apparently we started walking differently everywhere we went after we had done all of this. It just gets into your body in a way that changes you and gives you a real sense of swagger, a pep in your step. So that was sort of fed to us very organically through learning as much as possible what these guys do for a living. And it was designed after the naval aviation training courses. I mean, they do it a little bit differently, obviously, but it wasn’t that dissimilar. We told [our real-life counterparts] what we did, and they were like, “Oh yeah, that’s how you learn to do what we do, eventually.” So we were able to bring that with us in our performance, which helps.

AVC: Did you ever expect that you would be taking on a role like this?

MB: I never expected that I would ever have the opportunity to play a fighter pilot. If you’d asked me, I would have been, like, “Yeah, let’s do it!” But I never expected to be handed this opportunity. And when I saw the first movie, I remember being like, “Oh, I’d love to be in a movie like that—but I never thought it could be as a pilot.” And it’s nothing like anything I’ve ever played. I had a conversation with Joe at the beginning right after I was cast, where he was like, “I’ve watched all your material and this isn’t like anything you’ve ever done.” But we went through it in the audition process and I think as an actor, each character you play can be a certain side of yourself, and in terms of humans and how we operate, we’re capable of doing all kinds of things, good and bad. It’s just about what we choose. So not to say an actor who plays an evil character is that person, of course, but maybe they had the opportunity to be that person and chose not to. So I think in this sense, it was something that was within me, or some portion of it was. And I got to just absorb the world around me and bring her out to the best of my ability.

AVC: I’m a huge fan of your work on Unreal. What kind of roles are you looking for in the future?

MB: I have been really lucky to be able to design my career after finding roles that are really different from the last thing I played. So I right now I’m in production for a spy series on Netflix, which as an actor is just a goldmine because you not only get to play one character, but you get to play a character playing seven different characters, as she goes undercover and as she lives her cover life. So that’s a lot of fun, and also it involves a lot of stunts. The back-and-forth between maybe doing something that’s more, I don’t know, classically masculine, and then doing something that’s more stereotypically feminine, I just get to do that dance a lot, which is really, really fun for me. I would love to do a classic period piece after this. But I’m always just looking to to do something different.


Deprecated: file_exists(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($filename) of type string is deprecated in /home/devavclub/public_html/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1616

13 Comments

  • dremiliolizardo-av says:

    The movie was fun and she was great. I don’t really get the glowing reviews. It’s a big, loud, dumb, fun, summer movie that leans very heavily on nostalgia for the first one. It has as much (or more) shot-for-shot and scene-for-scene stuff as recent Star Wars or Star Trek, but it seems to be getting a pass for all that. I didn’t really mind because it was what I expected. I don’t think people are going to this movie looking for something new and they are getting what they want.

    • better-than-working-av says:

      Funny enough, the headline for this interview nailed why I think the original Top Gun is a more interesting, er, artistic achievement (I know, I know this just Top Gun but still) than the sequal. I think Maverick was awesome and is a superior movie, but it felt like I was watching Top Gun: Mission Impossible. The action is better, it has an actual plot. and all of the actors do a good job, but it lacks the intesne, weird. coked-out vibes of the first movie that gave everything a sense of swagger.

      It’s probably appriopriate since Maverick is about a 50-some year old pilot at the end of his career vs. a 20-something year old competing with other hot shots, but despite being wildly entertaining, I felt a little deflated. 

    • talesofkenji-av says:

      Yuss. It’s good, very good even, and the aerial photography is some kind of a technical achievement. I enjoyed it more than TG ’86. But the reviews are, like, rapturous. Like lives have been changed, like the movies have been saved. Not sure what that is all about.

    • cogentcomment-av says:

      A couple of days ago I plugged in Top Gun: Maverick on IMDB (to look up Barbaro’s credits, actually) and discovered it’s now ranked the #49 movie of all time.The only statistically significant group that doesn’t give it 8.6 or higher is us, 45+ males (8.5), along with Top 1000 reviewers (8.1). It was fun, but the way I’ve described it without spoilers to people who haven’t seen it yet is that it’s a Tom Cruise film, for better or for worse. That was my exact thought in the theater when the ending I thought might make it slightly more profound was promptly replaced by batshit insanity, since…that’s a Tom Cruise movie. First time I saw Edge of Tomorrow I walked out of the theater realizing that one reason I liked it so much was that it wasn’t a typical Cruise movie given the not-particularly likeable character he played for most of the film.There’s an interesting saying in the aviation community, which is that there are old pilots, there are bold pilots, but there are no old bold pilots; that could have been a great spine for the narrative. Instead we got a standard formula action movie that had less green screen than anything in a long time, and I guess that’s the bar for all time great nowadays.Especially if you were a 45+ woman, who have the highest ratings among any demo at 8.9.

      • dremiliolizardo-av says:

        I also thought they might do something different, probably the same thing you thought. But no, they just turned the crazy dial up to 11 after that. Then they broke the knob off the dial, got out the Sawzall, cut open the crazy machine, and overclocked that sucker till it started small fires on the desk.I believe those demographics since I wouldn’t have seen it in the theaters but 45+ woman Mrs Lizardo wanted to. She loved it. I’m not unhappy we went, but I wouldn’t have felt I was missing out on anything if we hadn’t.

    • isaacasihole-av says:

      Feel pretty much the same. Thought it was 2/3 of a solid, fun movie, and 1/3 some pretty amazing flight sequences at the end. Could have used less Tom Cruise and more time spent on the other characters.

    • bcfred2-av says:

      See I thought it used the nostalgia angle very effectively. Seeing Cruise and Kilmer together really landed the fact that 35 years have elapsed. It’s broadly known that Kilmer nearly died from throat cancer and can’t speak, which is worked into the script. And seeing Maverick being put out to pasture (sorry) when the last time we saw him he was a young hotshot who was the biggest hero in the English-speaking world felt like the ending of a real era. But you didn’t need any of that to really enjoy the movie, so I have a hard time saying it leaned on the nostalgia. It just tapped into it in a way that felt organic.I obviously liked it better than others on this thread because it absolutely exceeded every one of my expectations. 

    • akabrownbear-av says:

      The overall plot of this movie felt distinctly different than the first movie because Maverick is still the main character and is in a different role. It felt like a natural progression for his character vs a rehashing of the story from before to me. And it was really well-made – the movie is paced well and the fighter jet scenes are exhilirating to watch.That’s the main difference between this movie and the new Star Wars to me. The Star Wars movies all felt like a rehashing of the plot, with a lot of the older characters returning to their old roles (like Han and Leia) and the power struggle between the First Order and Resistance mirroring the Empire and Rebel Alliance.

  • decgeek-av says:

    Actor learns to act like a pilot…In other news…water is still wet. 

    • stickmontana-av says:

      I think it’s cool that they took flight training and were actually in these jets shooting practical effects instead of a bunch of garbage CGI and green screen acting that is in almost every movie that comes out these days.
      But given that water is still wet as you say, dum dum commenters will still post a snarky comment that manages at once to both completely miss the point of the article and be completely inane.You really have to admire the quality of the a “approved” commenters on Kinja. Bringing so much value to the community.LOL.

    • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

      I kinda feel the same way about this kind of thing. Tom Hanks makes the cast go to astronaut training and infantry training. B.S. You learn your lines, you hit your mark and probably look pretty.

  • jakealbrecht1985-av says:

    By smirking slightly. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin