Patton Oswalt on politics, aging, and knowing when to get out of the way

TV Features Patton Oswalt

Your browser does not support the video.

In 2016, Patton Oswalt went through one of the worst situations anyone can find themselves in: The unexpected death of Michelle McNamara, his wife and mother to their daughter, Alice. Oswalt grieved both privately and publicly, the latter most notably in the aptly titled Netflix special Patton Oswalt: Annihilation. Somewhere around the taping and release of Annihilation, though, Oswalt found love again, with actor and voice artist Meredith Salenger. Soldiering on, he continued to work on beloved shows like A.P. Bio, An Emmy For Megan, and Veronica Mars; in films like The Secret Life Of Pets 2; and as a sort of orchestrator for the release of McNamara’s book about the Golden State Killer, I’ll Be Gone In The Dark.

Now, Oswalt is back with a new Netflix special, Patton Oswalt: I Love Everything, which—as you can tell from its title alone—has a slightly different tone than its predecessor. In it, the comedian dives into his thoughts on turning 50, his feelings about comedy in the age of Trump, and even a little spat he had with Salenger. It’s both light and dark, wry and spry, and it’s quintessentially Oswalt.

The A.V. Club talked to Oswalt about the special, the futility of doing Trump material, and the unlikely resurrection of A.P. Bio.


The A.V. Club: We’re about two months into stay-at-home orders here in L.A., and at the beginning of this whole thing, you did a very funny video about doing stand-up in your yard. Now that we’re deeper into it, do you have perspective on how quarantine has affected the comedy community? Obviously, no one can tour. No one can play local shows.

Patton Oswalt: It’s very, very frustrating. And I don’t like predicting things, because it’s always such a crapshoot.

I can say for sure that a lot of mid-level comedians who haven’t quote-unquote “broken” yet and that were still kind of depending on the road—not just for money, but for the experience and the seasoning and stuff—are really, really missing that. It’ll be interesting to see which comedians adapt and survive, much like in the late ’80s when the comedy club scene completely collapsed, and then you had the rise of alt-comedy and things like that. But this is a much more profound collapse because even though there was a collapse of the club scene and alt-comedy rose, alt-comedy was still comedians in front of people connecting with them in that form. Now the form itself has changed unilaterally for everyone that does it.

I am humble enough to admit that I can’t see how comedy will work without an audience or without live human beings in front of you. Maybe there’s a solution that I’m not seeing that a younger and much smarter generation that is more used to these kinds of setups will be able to see and exploit, and make live and make pop. But right now, if comedy can’t be a live event, I don’t know what the alternative is.

You’ve seen these monologists doing their home stuff—Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers. They’re adapting as best they can, but there’s just something missing there. And I’m saying that about people that are really, really good at this. There is something missing.

Maybe someone will create technology where everyone sitting at home with headphones can hear the other people laughing at what the guy is saying, and he can also hear what the audience is doing. But there has to be the give and take, because that’s what makes every live comedy performance unique. Every audience is its own, specific sentient being in that moment. It can suddenly change what the performer, what he or she does. That’s what makes it so exciting to go see. Right now, I don’t know how anyone recreates it over .

AVC: Well, people are trying. I’ve been watching drag shows online, and I know they’ve streamed stand-up shows, and UCB did ASSSSCAT! via stream.

PO: Yeah, but I heard early on, people rushed out to put together open mic nights and performances, and they were just disasters. There was a lot of glitchiness. Zoom and Instagram Live are very susceptible to trolls coming on. I think Maria Bamford got shut down by some so that’s actually a huge disadvantage. At least in a comedy club, if someone is heckling or being an asshole, they’re right there. Now, suddenly you’re trying to re-create the comedy club, and you’re giving the worst elements of the audience complete anonymity to do whatever they want.

So, there was that initial “this isn’t really working.” Even when vaudeville transitioned to TV, they still brought an audience into the TV studio—this is the first time where you cannot bring a live audience into something.

AVC: They did a live audience for Weekend Update on the first SNL At Home.

PO: How?!

AVC: It was a little unclear. It was just disembodied laughs, and I don’t think it worked. They’ve stopped doing it since. It just felt suspect. Like, are these friends? Other writers? Who are these weird voices laughing?

PO: Especially now, Gen Z and the millennials coming up are—way more than our generation—very suspect about anything that they see on the internet. Weirdly enough, because everyone talks about how, “Oh, Gen Z and millennials are so gullible.” It’s actually the boomers and the Gen Xers that are the most gullible. It’s the kids who grew up with it that actually have the one-step distance and the, “Hang on, wait a minute. Let’s make sure this isn’t a deepfake or something taken out of context.” I see way more savvy and skepticism from younger people in terms of what they see on the internet, as opposed to us, where we tend to run with things. I’ve been very guilty of grabbing something out of context or getting whipped up by what I saw online, and now I’ve instituted a 24-hour waiting policy on anything that I react to.

AVC: A few bigger music venues have shut down, like Great Scott in Boston. The Troubadour is struggling. I’m wondering how comedy venues will fare, because while restaurants can do takeout, you’ve got to think that no one is ordering takeout from Zanies. No one is like, “Ooh, I miss those chicken fingers.”

PO: I’ve also been very worried about a lot of these comic book stores, because they’re all little independent operators. The fact that an institution like Forbidden Planet in New York City is hanging on by its fingernails shows you how precarious it all is. I’ve bought gift certificates to a lot of different stores, like, trying to recreate financially what a Wednesday feels like, when people come in and dump money. I’m doing little cash mob things, but I don’t know how that works. Is there going to be a transition over to digital, or I hear they are going to try to start operating the store in some respect again on May 20? I don’t know.

Everything is so precarious. I think a lot of us are flashing back to, and I can’t remember the guy’s name—and I feel bad for him, because he’s a very smart guy… who wrote that now infamous essay, I think in 1995 about how e-commerce is not going to take hold? [The author is Clifford Stoll—you can read the essay at this link.—Ed.] That it’s not going to replace going into a store and actually holding a record or vinyl. He wrote this very big manifesto at the dawn of the internet. Like, right before eBay, right before Amazon, right before they all really clicked, and now they almost celebrate the anniversary of this terrible prediction. To his credit, he owns it. I forget who this guy is. But anyway, I think a lot of us now are so gun shy about making pronouncements. We’re not even really two months into the stay-at-home yet. So two months in feels very premature to roll the dice on predicting a model of the future.

Also, I think a lot of us are worried about if someone makes a prediction or does a forecast, and enough people start running with it and repeating it, then that just becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, and it sinks into people’s heads like, “No, we don’t need to reopen these things,” and then it just never happens again. I think that’s being shown in the forceful, premature, “We are reopening the cruise lines! Cruises are going!,” because they know that no one wants to do it anymore. So it’s almost like they think if they hammer it enough into the public’s head, then cruises will just exist again. It’s almost like they’re trying to preempt everyone going, “No, I don’t want to be on a ship where I’m eating on a buffet every night.” There could not be more negatives to going on a cruise during the time of COVID-19. Which is why they’re hammering people. “The cruises are going to start again! We are going to start.” [Laughs.] Guys? What are you doing?

AVC: If you offered me a free cruise, with free flights, all expenses paid, drinks, whatever, I’m still not getting on a Carnival Cruise out of Galveston, Texas right now.

PO: Yeah. It’s like, guys, that’s just not going to happen anymore. I don’t even know if buffets are going to happen, let alone cruises. I’m reading essays by people in the business community that are writing, “We don’t think buffets will ever come back.” It’ll be a thing like when you watch movies from the ’80s, and there’s a smoking and nonsmoking section on a plane. You’ll watch movies where people are at buffets and go, “Oh yeah, people used to do that. They used to just lay food out, and everyone would just lean over it and scoop.”

Just like with everything, there’s going to be things that, when we come out of this, will no longer be. We’ll look back on in pop culture and go, “Oh, that’s… Okay. Yeah. That’s right.” “Weird Al” Yankovic posted that really funny video of him and his family watching some movie with The Rock, and The Rock and this other guy shake hands in a big way, and he recorded this video of him going, “Aah!” They’re all screaming at the handshaking. So that’s going to be fascinating to see.

AVC: I think that when I go into Target, and there’s just people browsing, touching stuff. People digging for stuff at T.J. Maxx, which I used to love.

PO: Exactly. And look, I love Ross. I love T.J. Maxx. There’s nothing wrong with that stuff, man. I love thrift stores, and I love going to Goodwill. And now I’m like, are those going to exist? Are people going to go do that? I hope so.

AVC: Well, out of necessity for a lot of people, surely.

PO: But is this going to get in the way of a lot of the reusing and recycling of things because people are going to be so paranoid about anything that’s been used before? They’re just going to toss and burn and trash everything.

AVC: I suppose this kind of relates, but your special is about, in part, coming to terms with being 50, finding love again, and gradually sliding into “old man racism.” Does it feel like a different sort of special in terms of vibe for you in any sense?

PO: The last special was about absolute grief, and—you know, the title, Annihilation—and do I even go on? I ended on the shakiest sliver of hope. And so this one, it felt almost like a resurging of the life force. And for a comedian, what the resurging of the life force looks like is that I’m just going to be as goofy as I possibly can and actually enjoy stuff, and not get that dark and deep. Though there is some darkness and deepness in it, because you can’t help it these days.

There’s a beauty in, as you age, getting the fuck out of the way. You’ve got to get the fuck out of the way. The generation before the baby boomers, there was a certain beauty in that they were raised with the idea that you do your job, you revel in your youth. And then, as you get older, they were able to die with some dignity, but also, you got out of the way for the next generation. And then the boomers are the exact opposite of that. They say, “We are not getting out of the way. It’s got to end with us.” They hate anyone behind them. All those dumb memes about avocado toast. They cannot stand the fact that they’re older. They’re white-knuckling their youth, and it’s causing so many problems. A generation unwilling to get out of the way is what gums up the works.

Gen X, fortunately, we have “whatever, never mind.” I think we’re a little better equipped to go, “okay, I’m grayer, I’m older. I don’t need to be the hip person anymore. I will get out of the way and let whatever the next thing is come up.”

A lot of that holding on can also come from people that don’t live good youths, either because of forces beyond their control, or because of crappy choices that they make. And then you can literally see them resenting twentysomethings coming up that are maybe a little more put together or that are enjoying their youths. So they want to quash that.

Baby boomers and some Gen Xers are all about, “These kids need to have promise rings, and stop sleeping around so much, and using so many drugs.” Oh, you mean like you did, like you can’t anymore? And you resent people being able to do that? So the only joy you have left is to stop them doing that.

So in a very subtle way—I don’t lay it out this way in the special, but there’s an undercurrent of “revel in your time, you don’t get to be the young, up-and-coming thing forever.” Get the hell out of the way, and let the next wave come up. Have some grace. Bow out gracefully. There’s some story, I think it was about Pete Townshend and John Entwistle talking in the early ’80s. The Who were always on the vanguard, and then suddenly, punk and hip-hop starts to come up. Entwistle was talking to Pete Townshend, and he says, “I don’t get this hip-hop.” And Pete said, “It’s not our job to get it. It’s our job to get out of the way and let them do it.” We had our time, let them have their time.

I think a lot of the problems that we’re experiencing right now are because there’s a generation, and I don’t want to lay it all on the boomers—there are many, many self-actualized and self-aware boomers that are very cool about getting out of the way—but there’s a very vocal contingent that do not like the fact that they are heading into their 60s and 70s, and they will do anything to end the world with them. I think that that’s a lot of the undercurrent of this—I don’t even want to call it a Republican death cult. I think it’s a generational death cult where they were the first generation that was all about being young and being cool, and if they can’t be the young and cool ones anymore, they’ll just take everything out. And I think that Trump was just a symptom of that temper tantrum for them. Which, you know, it’s easy to make jokes about for a couple of minutes, and then it just gets really depressing.

I talk about that, too. I don’t really have any Trump material in this special, because having Trump as the president is terrible for a comedian. You’re not needed. If he’s the president, the public doesn’t need you coming in, “You want to hear a joke I wrote about this?” Nah, we’re good. We can see it. We’re just watching it.

AVC: There was also a point, too, when it might have been funny, but it’s just not funny anymore.

PO: No, it’s not. And I don’t even think it’s funny for his followers, because early on, I think it was really fun, and there was a lot of joy, and a lot of almost punk rock prankish energy to what they were doing. And now, their smiles are like death rictuses. They’re all like, “Look at the fun we’re having! We’re owning the libs!” And they’re saying it as they’re dying. There’s a Masque Of The Red Death feel to it now, where even they can’t hide the fact that they’re just not having fun or that it’s scary and sad for them.

AVC: They’ve really whittled it down, too. The White House staff used to feel robust-ish, and now it’s like, “Now, we’ve got like the core eight, and that’s it. No one else!”

PO: I’ve also seen that in the past in certain comedy scenes that I was in, and other social scenes, where a lot of times, if a social group gets together because they’re ostracizing and shutting out other people, that’s what adheres it. Once they’re done shutting out everyone that’s not their core group, the energy is still there that they need to keep shutting people out. So then they just turn on each other, and the group dissolves.

You saw it with Andy Warhol’s Factory, and any kind of cultural zeitgeist grouping that is—how do I put it? Like, no one bullies harder than the formerly bullied. Nobody ostracizes harder than the formally ostracized. If that’s the energy, then eventually, the group turns on each other. So I think the Trump core now is at the, “We’ve shut out everyone else, and all we’ve got is each other.” And they’re going to celebrate that for a little bit, and then they’re just going to start turning on each other, because that’s the energy that drives them, and that doesn’t sustain any kind of group.

AVC: Your Twitter is fairly political. I’m not sure how to phrase this, but do you think comedy can change minds? I have to imagine at this point, most of your followers are people that think the same way you do.

PO: Well, but then there’s a lot of my followers that—some of them are bot accounts, but some of them are, “I’m following this guy because I hate him, and I’ve got to let him know.” Again, there’s that energy.

It’s not that I think that comedy can change minds. I think that art can change minds, whatever it is. A song, a moment in a movie. I’m sure you’ve experienced it, too. Something you’ve read, something you’ve heard, something you’ve looked at has changed the way you look at the world. I don’t mean you hear a song, and you suddenly go, “We’ve got to save the environment.” Even the tiniest change in your behavior sends out a ripple effect into the universe, and into the world that you live in. So yes, by definition, any kind of art can change people’s minds.

Obviously I don’t think retweeting a picture or a thought is going to completely turn everything around. But it’ll create a little effect, and the cumulative effect of it is what does it. I’ve seen that in just my own experience. The first time I went onstage as a comedian didn’t change the world, but I got a tiny half-laugh. And the next time, I got a slightly bigger one. So it’s all incremental, and it happens over a long time. And then suddenly, everything has changed because you kept showing up and doing it. Even if you see the tiniest little shift, if you’ve lived long enough, you know what that shift can turn into. It’s very, very important.

AVC: That’s a good way to put it.

PO: It’s also really interesting how you talk about Trump’s base, and the MAGA core. You can really see how things are changing for them in terms of joy and happiness because of what they’re reacting to now. It used to be that someone would go, “Trump is a terrible president. He sucks.” They would go, “AHHHHHH! Shut up.” But now, it’s that George W. Bush put out a video calling for unity, and the Trumpers are attacking him, even though he didn’t even mention Trump in the video. He was just saying, “Let’s all come together and try to help this.” But the idea of saying, “Let’s come together and have unity,” they perceive that as an attack, which shows you where they are in terms of the arc of their misery.

A friend of mine participated in a video—this is a couple of years ago—that was anti-hate. It had nothing to do with Trump. There were Republicans and Democrats in it. It was all anti-hate. But he got swarmed on his social media. People were like, “Why do you hate Trump so much?” He’s like, “It was just an anti-hate PSA that I did a little thing on.” But that’s how they perceived it. So it’s a huge tell as to how they’re reacting to things, as much as what they react to.

AVC: You talk about sex quite a bit in the new special. It feels like maybe even more than in past specials. Do you think that’s true?

PO: I don’t know. In my past specials, I’ve talked about orgies and porn.

I don’t talk about it in a, “Men are like this about sex, and women are like this about sex.” [Harumphs.] I’m trying to do a bit more of a bemused you know. Again, as you get older, and you look back on how you were, in all aspects—socially, philosophically, and sexually when you were younger—when you look back on it all when you’re older, there’s so much comedy to be mined from that. Like, oh my god, if I could sit down with the person I was, I’d have to stop myself from slapping this idiot half the time. So maybe if there’s more sexuality there, maybe that’s why? But I’ve never been fascinated with sex as a comedic topic. I’m fascinated with whatever I can make funny.

But this is the other thing I love when I put out a piece of work. There’s stuff that people will notice about it that maybe you didn’t notice. So, shoot, I’ve got to watch that again. Maybe there is more sex in it than there used to be in my stuff. Again, maybe I’m changing in ways that I didn’t see, which, I love that.

AVC: You have a bit in the special about an argument that you had with your wife. Have you set boundaries for what from your home life you can talk about in stand-up and what you can’t? Which conversations and which arguments are off-limits?

PO: Well, yeah, but that was something that I had talked about with Meredith, obviously.

I don’t want to be Howard Stern and talk about absolutely everything that’s going in my life, but the argument that we’re talking about is a very specific argument, and there’s a very specific denouement to the argument that we had, and I think it was illustrative. It wasn’t so much that I was revealing anything about us. I think it’s more illustrative of how people’s good intentions can end up going the wrong way, and there’s something kind of beautiful about it.

It’s ultimately a very, very sweet story. I can’t even remember now what the argument was about. Literally. It’s one of those things where I know we had a big blowout argument. I know that it ended with me going on a hike. And then, the way that we fixed it made it more—it was like that bit I did about my daughter seeing that moment from that movie The Wolf Man that was so scary. And then, me thinking, “Oh my god. She’s scarred for life.” And then, in trying to fix it, I made things 10 times worse. The best comedy is always people thinking “I’m going to try to help.” And then their helping makes things so much worse than it needed to be.

AVC: HBO recently announced an I’ll Be Gone In The Dark miniseries, based on the book your late wife was working on that you helped finish. What’s been the rollercoaster of working on that book, response to the book, making the movie—the whole thing?

PO: That is such a good way to put it. It is a rollercoaster. Obviously, I don’t want to dwell on that horrible, dark part of my life and of Alice’s life. And of Michelle’s family’s life. But there was some real deep and intense work that she did, in terms of benefitting the victims of these crimes, and just a bigger sense of justice in the universe. So I didn’t want the book to be left undone. And I also didn’t want there to be this untold story of the effect of him being captured for the victims and for the families.

When Liz Garbus approached me about how we would structure the movie, which is about Michelle’s life and passing, and then the aftermath of it all, it was hard for me to say no. I’m an exec producer on it. I helped gather as many materials as I could, and put together as many interviews as I could. But it was Liz that did the bulk of the work. Just like with the book, there was only so much I could do, because I was so emotionally attached. I couldn’t have physically or emotionally gotten through it, which is why Billy Jensen and Paul Haynes were able to step up. So people would say, “Oh, you finished Michelle’s book” and I would say “no, I handed the materials over to two geniuses and begged them to help bring it home, and they did.” And it’s just like with this documentary.

Liz Garbus, just the level that she operates on as a documentarian and as a filmmaker is—it’s kind of humbling to watch what she was able to put together. And it’s something that I never could have done. I am a tiny element of this much bigger story when you see the documentary. So that was my thinking about it. It’s for her legacy, and for these women that survived this absolute evil insect of a person.

I’ve met some of the survivors and some of the victims at book events and stuff, and it’s so humbling to see that. It’s amazing. So I didn’t want their stories to kind of fall into silence or fall into the overall chatter that’s going on. I wanted to give it all a longer, more somber, more thoughtful portrait.

AVC: Speaking of another rollercoaster: A.P. Bio went away, and then was reborn. What was happening behind the scenes? And then what did you hear? Is everything shot? Are you guys on schedule?

PO: Yeah. We shot what we wanted to shoot.

Basically, we did the first two seasons, and Mike O’Brien is such a unique mind. And Glenn Howerton is one of the producers on the show, and he also has a very, very unique perspective and approach to how comedy and how characters should be done. It’s just unlike anything I’ve ever seen. And so we got through the first two seasons and I know they had plans for a third.

Part of me understands it wasn’t getting good TV ratings. But the streaming ratings, the views on Hulu and stuff were through the roof. It was one of those things where I think there’s a shift going on in how things are seen. Just like when Brooklyn Nine-Nine got saved, I didn’t want this vision to fizzle out this early when Mike didn’t get a chance to build the world that I know he wants to build.

All of the cast members, including me, just took to Twitter and—it was this very sincere. Please, let us keep doing this and finish this, because there are storylines and scripts that we’ve seen that we really want to bring out in the world.

I don’t even think it was the overall numbers on social media. I think it was the sincerity of it. There wasn’t any trying to be clever or snarky about it. It was flat-out, “Hey, we really like this show. We really like doing it, and we want to keep doing it. Please give us a chance.” And to NBC’s credit, they stepped up and found a way.

AVC: Everyone kind of makes fun of, like, “Oh, there’s 90,000 different things you need to watch now,” But for creators, that can be great. You can make the show that people can see that maybe they couldn’t have seen.

PO: Yeah, exactly. I love that the gates are wide open, and it depends on who wants to go through them, and what they want to try to bring through them. And then it’s up to them to find the audience. But the work is getting done, and it’s amazing.

It’s still frustrating when a show like Lodge 49 goes away that you wish would stay, or a show like Happy! I knew what they planned for season three that didn’t get to exist. But then, at the same time, What We Do In The Shadows gets to happen, or I just watched that movie Bad Education on HBO, which I don’t think would have been made as a theatrical film. It is so odd. It’s brilliant, but its way of storytelling is so incredible.

We’re living in a great time of “Why not?” Let’s try it. We have the technology to do it. Let’s do it.

47 Comments

  • anotherburnersorry-av says:

    Time’s been kinder to that Stoll essay than Oswalt thinks:‘What the Internet hucksters won’t tell you is that the Internet is one big ocean of unedited data, without any pretense of completeness. Lacking editors, reviewers or critics, the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data’

    • yourmomandmymom-av says:

      Also the fact that so many online shops don’t make money, even the big ones. 

    • captain-splendid-av says:

      “the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data”This is hilariously untrue. There’s literally thousands of people curating content every day on dozens of different platforms.
      Like this one.

      • yourenotsmart-av says:

        So you can’t read huh? 

      • anotherburnersorry-av says:

        Curated content overwhelmed by uncurated content (or algorithmically curated content), and even so the nature of the curation of internet content is frequently questionable as well (see e.g., ‘sponsored content’). Stoll’s correct here.

        • captain-splendid-av says:

          Nope. You just need better software (or put a little effort in). And Stoll should know better than to make sweeping generalizations.

          • anotherburnersorry-av says:

            Better software’s going to keep internet content from being overwhelmed by misinformation, sponsored content, and lowest-common denominator clickbait? And tech/social media companies will be willing to use/allow this magic software to weed out bad content? Or no, making sure bad information doesn’t spread is up to the individual, rather than experts who can weed out good content from bad? Sure.I mean, certainly Stoll overgeneralized in some ways, but broadly he was correct that the Internet would not be the unalloyed good that a lot of people thought it would be in the 1990s.

          • captain-splendid-av says:

            “Better software’s going to keep internet content from being overwhelmed by misinformation, sponsored content, and lowest-common denominator clickbait?”Why does it have to be binary? I’m offering tools, not silver bullets.“And tech/social media companies will be willing to use/allow this magic software to weed out bad content?”Really depends on how much they give a crap. Consider: Software piracy is actually a solvable problem from a technical perspective, but it happens anyway because it’s understood that losing a few sales you weren’t mostly going to get anyway gets made up at least partially by exposure.“Or no, making sure bad information doesn’t spread is up to the individual”Congrats, you’ve accidentally stumbled onto the truth. The internet isn’t a pipe delivering content to your bored ass, it’s a network. And as a node on that network, your actions have consequences, however small.“would not be the unalloyed good”Ugh. This stupid mindset.

          • seven-deuce-av says:

            “Software piracy is actually a solvable problem from a technical perspective.”

            Came here for the lulz and you provided it. Kudos!

          • dirtside-av says:

            Consider: Software piracy is actually a solvable problem from a technical perspectiveCan you explain this? To the best of my knowledge (computer science degree, 20 years as a software engineer) there’s no foolproof form of preventing software piracy.

          • captain-splendid-av says:

            Nothing’s foolproof, but I’m sure SaaS fits the bill.

          • dirtside-av says:

            Only to the degree to which something can function as SaaS. Generally the code still has to run locally and there’s nothing preventing you from mocking the backend.

      • frankwalkerbarr-av says:

        That doesn’t mean that the unfiltered data doesn’t overwhelm the filtered. Things like the antivax movement have been greatly helped by the Internet because while before there were a few books of bullshit medical advice out there, they at least had to make it through a publisher. Now any crackpot can have a website, and many do.

        • captain-splendid-av says:

          “That doesn’t mean that the unfiltered data doesn’t overwhelm the filtered.”My point is that it doesn’t have to. When most of the objections boil down to “I was too lazy to do a google search”, those people deserve the hellscape they think they’re living in.

    • frankwalkerbarr-av says:

      And one of the reasons Stoll didn’t believe in e-commerce was that he didn’t see how credit cards could really be secured. And he was right! I’ve had to cancel my cards several times over the past twenty-some years that I’ve been shopping over the Internet because of breaches. The difference is that we’ve become used to it. I was freaked out the first time spurious changes starting showing up on my credit card bill, but these days it is just “Well, that sucks. Time to cancel the cards again”.

    • dirtside-av says:

      We all thought the Internet would be like an encyclopedia, only larger. Want to know about dolphins? Go to this one site and it has everything you ever wanted to know about dolphins! And it’s all accurate!In reality, there are 840,000 sites about dolphins and most of them are either full of inaccurate info, are poorly-written, or are basically copies of other sites. The democratization of information has also made it super cheap for everyone to put up whatever info they want. We haven’t yet figured out a mechanism equivalent to peer review, and Google unfortunately has no way to tell whether a site’s results are good or not, just whether they’re popular.

  • fever-dog-av says:

    What makes Patton or anyone else so sure there won’t be cruises or comedy clubs anymore?  At the risk of sounding callous and dismissive, this will ruin lots of businesses and change things but why wouldn’t it be temporary once we get a handle on this virus?  Then new businesses and comedy clubs reopen.  Sincerely asking, not criticizing Patton.

    • anotherburnersorry-av says:

      Yeah I think fatalism is just as bad as ‘OPEN EVERYTHING NOW’ optimism. Certainly things will change but we don’t know how, and probably in ways we’re not expecting….I would not be shocked if people generally spent *less* of their time online post-COVID-19.

    • yourmomandmymom-av says:

      We don’t know. If we could predict the future we would all be billionaires. Having said that, the cruise industry needs to fucking die.

      • frankwalkerbarr-av says:

        Well, the ocean cruises anyway. I’ve been on a couple of Viking river cruises and they were nice. There the point wasn’t to hang out on a giant ship in the middle of nowhere but basically to serve as a hotel room that moved from town to town. Not that I’d want to go on one right now, but it would be sad if they went away for good.

    • nilus-av says:

      A lot of comedy clubs run on razor thin margins. So the fact that they are closed for two months means most will probably be closed for good. The question is once the economy comes back will we see some again. Possible, but I think that Covid-19 may end up pushing almost all comedy, including stand-up, online permanently. I fear the movie industry may be similar. You will still have a few major venues(and a few big theaters) and a handful of “cool indy” places but most people will consume from home. Cruises, on the other hand, I am pretty sure will come back. Those things are floating money makers and even if a few major ones go under, others will buy the assets and start a new. I expect once things calm down seeing very very cheap cruises for the next few years to get people back on those boats but it will come back. Should they is the real question, they are environmental disasters

      • covidtinfoilhatwearer-av says:

        A lot of comedy clubs run on razor thin margins. So the fact that they are closed for two months means most will probably be closed for good. The entity that runs the current club, sure.  But the spaces are sort of custom made to be comedy clubs, so if demand comes back for comedy clubs, then odds are some investor will come along and invest money to re-open them as comedy clubs.

        • nilus-av says:

          True but I think traditional stand-up comedy may be on the way out.  I can’t think of the last time I went to a comedy club to see a comic,  I have been to a couple in the last few years but its always to see live podcast recordings.  

    • keregi-av says:

      My read on that is he’s talking about the cultural changes that will follow this, not the direct economical impact. Will people WANT to go on cruises or eat at buffets now that they are seen as high risk for virus spread. Even if/when we have a handle on COVID and the virus that causes it, there will be other viruses. That’s always been true but now people are more aware then ever at how easily some viruses can spread.

      • bartfargomst3k-av says:

        I agree with your interpretation. Initially I think there will be a lot of hesitancy to do anything involving crowds but over time that will fade, especially as a vaccine becomes available and enough of the population gets exposed that transmission becomes less easy.
        The 1918 influenza epidemic wiped out 3% of the world’s population and within a couple of years people were back at baseball games, speakeasies, traveling by boat across oceans, etc.

        • keregi-av says:

          I’m not saying what I believe will happen – way too many unknowns at this point. I think he was speculating on possible shifts in our culture. I certainly don’t think his comments were “fatalism” or that he meant them as what will definitely happen.

      • oldaswater-av says:

        People love their Chinese buffets and magical thinking ( if I like it if must be safe) will have them back in them as soon as they reopen.

      • toomuchcowbell-av says:

        Cruise vacationing may recover, but I think buffet-style dining may actually be dead forever, and good riddance.It’s not actually that venerable as a chain-restaurant phenomenon. It started with “salad bars” in the mid-70s (my first job as a teenager was actually at the first restaurant in town to boast a salad bar) and then branched out to soup-and-salad, and finally to the sanitation nightmares we all know today. Restaurant buffets have lowered the standard of acceptable food quality, and they are impossible to keep contamination- or contagion-safe. I’d be happy to wave them all goodbye.

    • docnemenn-av says:

      Not to say that COVID-19 won’t have massive impacts of all different kinds on life and culture as a whole, or that I have any clue what they’ll be, but all the doom and gloom about things like this does remind me a little bit of how, immediately post-9/11, everyone was solemnly declaring that action movies and disaster movies where buildings explode and loads of people die were going to be extinct forevermore because no one would want to see fictional representations of disaster or famous buildings being destroyed or violence treated flippantly ever again.Less than three years later, The Day After Tomorrow — in which the White House is crushed by an aircraft carrier because of a tsunami, among other things — is released and becomes the sixth highest-grossing film in the United States alone. I’m not going to say that I know for certain what the future will hold, but what I do know is that humans are both surprisingly resilient and instinctively social animals. A lot of things will move online entirely or have an increased online presence, and a lot of businesses and livelihoods will immediately suffer, I have little doubt. But once things gradually calm down and the coronavirus is either removed 0r reaches a point where we simply adjust to its presence in our society, we will continue to find reasons to congregate socially. And among these reasons, I have little doubt, will be live comedy/cultural performances of some kind.

      • diabolik7-av says:

        ‘… in which the White House is crushed by an aircraft carrier because of a tsunami, among other things’. I’d forgotten that. Dear lord, that film was industrial-grade bollocks.

    • edmctheotherone-av says:

      It’s all about fear. This pandemic is probably 5 to 10 times worse than something we all were used to. As bad as it is, it’s really not that bad. We worry about spreading disease to weaker people and killing them but most of us are not weak and we aren’t really in danger of catching the disease and dying ourselves. A lot of the fear has been pumped by the media. I don’t know if that fear will continue after the media moves on to the next topic.On the other hand I have noticed that there are two types of people. Those who catch infections as they pass by and those who do not. The people who get sick notice when other people get sick because they always get sick right afterwards. Those people were already mildly afraid. Then, there are people like me who do not get sick. We don’t really notice when other people get sick unless we have to take care of them. Therefore, I am not afraid because regardless of my actual ability to avoid catching a disease, I feel like it won’t affect me. So, maybe I am completely misjudging how the general public will remember the fear and continue with it.In the USA we have blindly progressed as if we are impervious to anything bad. Pandemics only happen to the rest of the world. Did we learn a lesson here? I sure hope we do not use the same playbook we used for terrorism.

    • tigersblood-av says:

      “NEW NORMAL” can go die in a fire.

      If anything from states that are opening is showing, is that people are more than willing to go back to the same old shit they were doing before. In fact, they are aggressively demanding it.

      2021 will be a record revenue year for cruise ships and comedy clubs.

      That’s an iron clad guarantee!

    • doclawyer-av says:

      No one can predict the future, obviously, but if the pandemic becomes the new normal, there’s this unpredictable deadly virus that doesn’t go away, people don’t go to comedy clubs. They watch comedy online, they get twitter and tiktok and spotify and whatever the new ones are and that’s how they consume comedy, and they get used to it without a live audience, and then comics learn to deliver the material the new way, and new comics focus their energies on social media than in the dying area or touring clubs. And the clubs close down. That’s how it would happen. People will still like comedy. People will still vacation. It will just be unrecognizable to how it’s done now.Personally, I’m curious/scared to see what happens to education. That’s going to be a world destroying shitshow. 

    • hell-iph-i-kno-av says:

      I understand all the uncertainty with what services and institutions will continue after this shut down but let’s all deal in reality here and look to what we can learn from. China and East Asia have been through numerous shutdowns before with SARS, Avian flu, and other epidemics/pandemics. After the affliction burned out the society got back to the same destructive actions and horseshit as before … nothing changed except for the citizens knowing & accepting their response for the next time. Even US, in aftermath of Spanish Flu pandemic, learned a shit ton of good & bad things but we forgot them or got extremely lax … and so here we are, but buffets, bars, socializing, etc didn’t stop after Spanish Flu burned out. No, the 1920s were crazy lit, so all proof that we are too fucking stupid to do what’s right. No difference today. Not to minimize COVID-19 deaths and infections, but this 1st round has been not been devastating enough to slap people awake. We will learn nothing from the Great Pause of 2020. These pandemics often have waves and historically the 2nd wave is the worst. Now, with all this “back to business” horseshit we are priming the explosive for the 2nd wave. We will learn nothing until deaths are in the 10 millions and infected are in the hundreds of millions.  We will learn nothing until we witness families wiped out, children/adults/elderly dying, and a true loss of hope.  And if vaccines come about (grossly untested but just another hand in life’s poker game) we’ll fight to get them and then consider it all conquered.  The reality is that we’ve just delayed the inevitable and remain wholly unprepared for the next pandemic because of our inability to learn.  

  • treymarksthespot-av says:

    I’m glad A.P. Bio found a new home. What an incredible show.

    • doclawyer-av says:

      I tried to get into it but I couldn’t. The main character is exactly the kind of character I can’t take seriously. He’s a douche and the show sort of gets that but wants me to be on his side, to care about his journey, to see him vs the other losers at the high school, and I just can’t see it that way. For the show to work he’d have to be brilliant and compelling and the rest of the world would have to be awful and I’m not buying any of that. Besides, high concept sitcoms never work because he can only try to get revenge on that other guy for so long, before they run out of steam. And did they ever say why he got fired from Harvard?

      • treymarksthespot-av says:

        I believe he got fired from Harvard for punching someone in the face but I don’t really remember. The revenge concept gets resolved by the end of the first season and they expand it to him helping his students get revenge on other people although this wasn’t explored that often in the second season. The show follows the Community arc of the main character being less of the focus on the show as the ensemble cast gets to shine. Also he becomes less douchey as he gets more comfortable with his new “family.” The rest of the cast is so good that it makes the main concept of the show become less important than just enjoying the world they’ve created.

  • precognitions-av says:

    : 3

  • alksfund-av says:

    This guy is so full of uncontroversial opinions it’s sickening  

  • stevetellerite-av says:

    yeah.at this point he’s bruce villanche, isn’t he? he makes his money off “punching up” scripts and writing for others or had i heard an incorrect rumor? he’s become the people he always bitched about

  • actuallydbrodbeck-av says:

    A lot of that holding on can also come from people that don’t live good youths,I don’t know what this means. I’ve read it a number of times thinking it was me, now I’m not sure.

  • diabolik7-av says:

    Big fan of Patton and don’t want to correct him, but Bad Education was made as a theatrical film, and it was just that HBO bought all rights to the finished pic at the Sundance FF, outbidding some of the majors. And since he mentioned Brooklyn Nine Nine, he was great as the pathetically aggressive Fire Marshal Boone in a couple of episodes.

  • Fieryrebirth-av says:

    Self-awareness, understanding, and humility isn’t a thing that comes across “privileged” people easily, generational gap or not.

  • graymangames-av says:

    Can we just point out that, even if Patton didn’t mention him by name, there’s a joke in the special that not only calls out Louis CK for jerking off in front of women but that Patton makes it clear he’s not friends with him anymore?

    How gangster is that? “You’re gross and your fetish is dumb too.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin