D

Project Greenlight review: The new generation fails to live up to its promise

Issa Rae's Project Greenlight reboot for Max falls well short with this look at how the sausage gets made in the film industry

TV Reviews Project Greenlight
Project Greenlight review: The new generation fails to live up to its promise
Issa Rae and Kumail Nanjiani in Project Greenlight: A New Generation Photo: Jessica Perez/Max

Max’s latest iteration of Project Greenlight focuses on director Meko Winbush, chosen from thousands of submissions and 10 finalists by Insecure’s Issa Rae, her team at production company HOORAE, the executives at Catchlight Studios, and mentors Kumail Najiani and Gina Prince-Bythewood. The 10-episode reboot chronicles Winbush’s journey to make her sci-fi film, Gray Matter, as she gets studio resources and connections. If the concept sounds familiar, it’s because Ben Affleck and Matt Damon put their names on this project in 2001 and revived it in 2015 for a brief time (until Matt Damon said some weird stuff about diversity). With people of color now at the helm, Project Greenlight: A New Generation highlights a promising female filmmaker for the first time. Cool, right? Sadly, despite said resources and the charm of its flashy mentors, it’s rife with contradictions and impossible standards.

The show raises many questions: What is its actual aim, to show effective Hollywood mentorship or make a “great film” to enhance the brands involved? Is it to shepherd new, marginalized folks into a career path or make this look impossible for ordinary humans to achieve? Is it to mystify the process of filmmaking further and drive away people with class, social, physical, ethnic, racial, and neurological barriers? It’s hard to imagine anyone from underrepresented backgrounds or with significant life responsibilities rising to the standards and live-to-grind ethic shown in PG: A New Generation. Even those with abundant privilege don’t seem like they’d do well here.

The show insists Winbush’s communication style is a problem throughout because she’s quiet and, at times, terse. It’s then fair to wonder how someone might fare if English isn’t their first language or if they depend on a device to express themselves. This isn’t whataboutism; these are genuine questions about the potential to truly make space for diversity in this industry. If the PG team can’t seem to effectively help a first-time woman director to learn the communication skills essential to filmmakers—on a show that professes to be about helping people, no less—what hope is left for others with bigger hurdles? Perhaps, behind the scenes, the production team was more direct, but the audience isn’t privy to it. We get examples of people talking about “getting to the finish line” but not explaining the tangible risks of not taking their advice.

Love & Basketball director Prince-Bythewood shares that directors should work “24/7,” which sounds like a remarkable flex, but there’s no prudent insight into her schedule. The team goes hard to remind Winbush of the stakes if she fails or doesn’t make the most progressive choice from the candidates they gave her. At one point, Montrel McKay (HOORAE president of development) digs into her for choosing to staff too many white men on Gray Matter, citing Rae’s track record of supporting artists of color and being a “walking economy.” They push Winbush to aspire to the same thing. However, a white dude named Phil Gelatt wrote the script, which they repeatedly claim is not ready weeks into production. The HOORAE team commissioned it from him, but Gelatt is off in Rhode Island, and we never really learn what his deal is.

It’s also impossible to review the show without addressing its labor implications. In the summer of 2023, the WGA is still on strike, with a SAG-AFTRA one looming around the corner. Everyone on PG addresses the challenges of the 21-day production/18-day filming schedule for a project of this scale, especially with two crews involved: the one making the movie and the one filming the show. Maybe don’t give a first-time director that kind of obstacle. Or do, and just let their movie be bad. Let them fail! McKay insists that Rae often does it with new talent to help them learn.

Project Greenlight: A New Generation | Official Trailer | Max

It’s initially exciting that Winbush is selected for her dual writing and director skills, but it quickly appears to be a cost-cutting measure. They didn’t like the script, so PG picked a first-time director who could write—someone to exploit instead of paying more writers. (It’s telling that Max recently made headlines for trying to collapse writers and directors into one “creator” title). Sure, they bring in a consulting team for one roundtable when Winbush asks for help, but that’s asking for a different rate compared to the cost of hiring another writer or two to work on it. That still foists the problem onto someone who has never done a feature before. So this pressure falls on Winbush, who is supposedly there to direct. Is it common for directors, let alone first-timers, to completely retool a script? And, the more important question is, should they even have to do this when better scripts are out there, probably about the same topic? (Heard of The Blacklist, people? It’s not hard.) The vibe is that they want everything done cheap and actively make labor cuts first.

Once filming begins, the team forces people to go from overnights straight into day shoots to meet the demands of a tight schedule (To be fair, there doesn’t seem to be another choice). We’re told that hardly anyone agrees they can get what they need within this unusually short 18-day filming schedule. During filming at a farm, everyone’s lunch is pushed by several hours to catch the sunlight and stay on schedule. But this studio-imposed time crunch isn’t where production directs its ire. Project Greenlight edits things to make it look like Winbush is the unreasonable factor for wanting to take her time talking to actors and getting the shots she wants on her first-ever feature. The first-time director is the problem, not the system itself.

At its core, PG makes her the villain most of the time. Part of an episode focuses on Winbush spending a weekend in Las Vegas for a bachelor party when the others might be working. It’s a passive-aggressive move to film her at a hotel and use drone footage of the strip. Later, they add her social media posts about a different weekend excursion. It’s designed to depict her as someone squandering a special opportunity and access to cool mentors. Rae, Nanjiani, and Prince-Bythewood swoop in periodically, though they are all off on their pursuits (Barbie, Welcome To Chippendales, The Woman King) for almost the entire production. The line everyone loves to use here is “Feel free to call me if you need anything,” a cop-out placing the onus on the person who needs a hand to be the one to reach out—an extremely difficult thing for people to do if a system has ever failed them. Meanwhile, the person offering this platitude can get away with thinking they’ve done something. Yay them.

Project Greenlight is meant to show how the sausage is made. Well, that’s what they did. Impressive graphics illustrate the film’s concepts and show what the script looks like lined up with its corresponding scene. HOORAE’s Jax Clark is a standout with her explanations of the roles and terminology. But for better or worse, with toxicity in full view, this show reflects how things are currently functioning in the industry. It’s reminiscent of the conditions in these “mini rooms” we’ve heard so much about during the writer’s strike. What’s that Paul McCartney quote, “If slaughterhouses had glass walls, we would all be vegetarians”? Yeah, Project Greenlight: A New Generation feels like that.

Project Greenlight: A New Generation premieres on July 13 on Max

10 Comments

  • kingdom2000-av says:

    As someone who watched all the previous Project Greenlights, all the complaints made here (except the racial portion) were the same in the previous seasons. It was designed that way on purpose. In all cases it was a very low budget film. I think in the first couple of seasons it was only $1 million for the movie. The $2015 was $3 million. The design included a script that needed more drafts, a too tight deadline, and a far too condensed shooting schedule. For obvious reasons of reputation and wanting future work, they did not try to add “difficult actor” to the recipe but I am sure they tried. All while being helmed by an inexperienced director working with experienced producers who just do not have time for that newbie shit. Regards to cost, for comparison, I believe the average TV show in 2005 had a per episode budget of $500k. Today most television episodes cost around $2 million. Reality shows today are in the range of $500k per episode. A “cheap” theatrical movie nowadays is $30 million. Direct to video of better quality probably average $5 to $10 million. No mention was made in this article on the budget so I am guessing the budget is around $4 million.This season’s shooting schedule – 18 days. Avg. episode of TV? 7 to 8 days. Average cheap movie? 30 to 45 days. Big budget theatrical movie? 90 to 180 days. This newbie was given 18 days to do her movie (don’t remember the numbers for previous seasons but they were super tight and less then 30 days).The edit, since usually the producer is in control of both final cut of the film and the show itself, is embattled producer doing his or her all vs the idiotic director that just refuses to listen, learn and do as told to by the producer. The producer, to no surprise, gets the job done at the end with a finished film done on time and mostly on budget.Now this isn’t to say the show isn’t interesting to watch. It does give some insight on how the sausage is made, just know that it follows the rules of reality of leaving lot of context on the cutting room floor to tell the story of each “character”. I can’t say on this season, but I really do recommend the previous four seasons of Project Greenlight if can find them. They are worthwhile watching, just have to remember its the reality show version of making a cheap movie and recognize your only getting half the story.

    • kbroxmysox2-av says:

      What a fun time to have a show about a heroic producer, just trying to get the job done, what with an ineffectual director and a writer who’s work needs to be re-done and is absent. It’s the producers, the brave AMPTP that gets the job done. Silly striking writers and their “we want livable wages and not to be replaced by AI”. You should be lucky that the producers are always here to save the day.

  • marshalgrover-av says:

    I genuinely had no idea this was happening.

  • stalkyweirdos-av says:

    Isn’t “failing to live up to its premise” part of the Project Greenlight brand?

  • gargsy-av says:

    “It’s initially exciting that Winbush is selected for her dual writing and director skills”

    What? But I thought the script was written by some white guy because, you know, it says so IN THIS REVIEW.

  • adamtrevorjackson-av says:

    they need to bring back ‘on the lot’

  • ghostofghostdad-av says:

    The Big Sick easily one of my favorite romantic comedies but everything Kumail has done since has kinda sucked except for Welcome to Chippendales.

  • scobro828-av says:

    As someone who watched all the previous Project Greenlights, all the complaints made here (except the racial portion) were the same in the previous seasons. It was designed that way on purpose.
    Right. I thought they clearly never watched the show. It wasn’t really to ‘help’ people as much as trial by fire.

  • lmh325-av says:

    What was the Project Greenlight knock off where Shane Dawson was given money to make a movie using the same script that a female director also had where Shane Dawson’s movie made Zachary Quinto want to give up on life? The Chair?Project Greenlight has at least been a little more palatable in its execution in the past.

  • lildstryr-av says:

    Except that it’s totally normal for a low budget movie to have an 18 day shooting schedule and executive producers shouldn’t be on set every day. It’s distracting. When executives show up and it’s not a short visit, it means we have a pretty serious problem. If you want to direct a feature film, you’re jumping into the crazy feet first. Your tether to reality is your line producer. They’re your friend. Treat your crew with respect, they’re in the trench with you. You’ll survive. You need to be working at least as hard as the rest of the crew.Maybe the film is good this time. Probably not and that’s okay. She’s a first timer. Some of these complaints are as if the business is magically not for workaholic weirdos. (Dude, it’s only ever been for workaholic weirdos.) It’s always been about grinding. We can argue about labor ethics (and should) for days. But it’s exactly how it is. You work 6 days a week, 7 if you’re a producer. 12 hour days are the shortest ones you’ll have. In fact it’s 14 with your commute if you’re lucky. The studios deserve a ton of flack for exploiting and overworking people and so do a couple of the unions for acquiescing to the AMPTP. But you can’t pretend you don’t know that this has been a persistent issue. There is no amount of French Hours that will fix this (not that this article addresses that).The measure of what makes you a professional (or not) is if you can squash all the little human dramas happening to and around you and make the movie, and be a team.I have no idea if any if this show is going to be any good and have no skin in this—just this review is written from a voice that purports to know what it’s like. As a person who did this for over twenty years, making movies is weirder and harder than this show could make it look. It’s soul crushing even. It’s addicting because it’s so hard. All the people should try to make movies. It’s important that they do. But please, let’s not pretend that the movie business isn’t absolutely bananas. If that deters you, some other person is going to take your spot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin