5 unanswered questions from the True Detective: Night Country finale

We may know who committed the crimes, but there are still plenty of mysteries left in Ennis

TV Features True Detective
5 unanswered questions from the True Detective: Night Country finale
Kali Reis and Jodie Foster in True Detective season 4 (All images: HBO) Graphic: Karl Gustafson

For a series that makes a big deal out of asking the right questions, the finale of True Detective: Night Country sure left us with a lot of open-ended ones. Or maybe, as Jodie Foster’s Liz Danvers puts it, “Some questions just don’t have answers.” That’s not going to keep us from asking them, though. While season four’s two big murder cases were solved in the 75-minute episode, there are still some lingering mysteries that left us feeling less than satisfied. That’s not unusual for a show like True Detective, which always leaves some room for ambiguity and speculation. In fact, that’s part of the fun of it. So now that the final credits have rolled, let’s pull on some of those dangling threads and puzzle over the enigmas left behind at the end of the season.

previous arrow1. Who left Annie’s tongue at Tsalal Station? next arrow
1. Who left Annie’s tongue at Tsalal Station?
Finn Bennet, Jodie Foster Photo Michele K. Short/HBO

Danvers’ discovery of a severed tongue at the Tsalal station was the first piece of evidence that the case of the missing research scientists was somehow tied to the unsolved murder of Annie Kowtok six years earlier. Without waiting for the DNA results to come back (which do eventually prove that the tongue was Annie’s), Navarro jumps at the excuse to reopen the case and start investigating again. In the final episode, after Bee (L’xeis Diane Benson) finishes telling the story of what happened to the Tsalal researchers, Navarro (Kali Reis) stays behind and asks her who put Annie’s tongue there. Bee has no idea what she’s talking about. “That’s not part of our story,” she says. She could be lying, of course, but what reason would she have for not being truthful at that point? She’s already admitted to worse crimes, and Danvers and Navarro have made it clear they aren’t going to take the case any further. So if the women didn’t plant it there for Liz to find, who did? The episode gives us one clue. When Danvers is in the station’s kitchen having a snack, an orange rolls off the table and she leans down to pick it up. Under the table, in the same spot where she found the tongue, she sees a wet footprint. We never find out who the footprint belongs to, though. Or if it’s even real. We’ve seen physical manifestations of spiritual objects before, like the gold cross necklace, so it could be supernatural. Another option is that Raymond Clark left it there, but he was hiding under the hatch when the police were searching the station. And how could he have gotten it anyway?

50 Comments
Most Popular
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Share Tweet Submit Pin