The Oscars cut Anne Heche, Charlbi Dean and more from the televised In Memoriam segment

Charbli Dean starred in Triangle Of Sadness, which was nominated Best Picture, but was excluded from the Oscars' In Memoriam segment

Aux News In memoriam segment
The Oscars cut Anne Heche, Charlbi Dean and more from the televised In Memoriam segment
Charlbi Dean and Anne Heche Image: The A.V. Club

Last night’s Academy Awards ceremony was an amalgam of good (Brendan Fraser’s modelesque and supportive sons), bad (Jimmy Kimmel bothering a Nobel Peace Prize winner), and ugly (that beige carpet). But one moment of the bad persuasion felt both blatant and maddeningly easy to remedy: the omission of a few faces during the Oscars’ In Memoriam segment.

Set to the tune of Lenny Kravitz’s piano rendition of “Calling All Angels,” the segment highlighted a variety of figures that the industry lost this year, from executives and animators to composers and performers like Raquel Welch, Olivia Newton-John, and James Caan. The Academy did good work in highlighting different corners of the business but still managed to miss the mark in excluding three late performers who certainly deserved a spot in the nearly four-hour broadcast.

The most glaring omission perhaps was that of Charlbi Dean, the Triangle Of Sadness star who died unexpectedly in August at the age of 32. Due to Triangle Of Sadness’ three nominations she was featured in multiple other segments, but nevertheless, Dean wasn’t highlighted as part of the televised portion of the tribute. Anne Heche, who also died in August, was left out of the segment too, along with Goodfellas star Paul Sorvino (whose late co-star Ray Liotta thankfully received a spotlight in the onscreen tribute.) Other notable omissions included Sacheen Littlefeather, Leslie Jordan, Gilbert Gottfried, and Tom Sizemore.

Although post-broadcast, the Academy did virtually share an extended gallery highlighting more than 200 filmmakers, artists and industry executives on A.frame, the Academy’s digital magazine, it still feels like an oversight to choose not to highlight such influential figures in Hollywood, especially a young woman whose performance sat at the center of one of the night’s nominated films.

106 Comments

  • electricsheep198-av says:

    That seems tough, because yeah I guess there can be hundreds of Hollywood figures who die each year. I wonder what’s the process for determining who makes the telecast. Anne Heche was very famous (and I liked her!), but if I’m the wife or kid of some lesser known cinematographer or sound engineer or something, maybe I’d like to see him in the main telecast too. It’s good that they at least didn’t just forget people completely, more a case of who makes the main telecast.

    • ohnoray-av says:

      Heche seemed like a weird oversight, aside from her career, she was a trailblazer in Hollywood by being so openly queer at awards ceremonies like the Oscar’s.

      • electricsheep198-av says:

        Yeah, and leaving out Littlefeather seems deliberate, but you could say that her actual movie work was too minimal.  And here in Nashville, leaving out Leslie Jordan seems like a crime.

        • surprise-surprise-av says:

          Jordan is best known for his television work. The year Farrah Fawcett was left out of the In Memoriam segment, they explained that they’re stretched for time and sometimes a star’s inclusion comes down to which field they were more prolific in. If it’s film, they’re featured at the Oscars but television means they’ll be featured at the Emmys (Jordan was an Emmy winner and beloved public figure so he’ll probably be featured prominently at the Emmys’ In Memoriam segment).

          If they included Jordan (who wasn’t really known for his film work) they would have had to cut someone lesser known. Sometimes there are exceptions, Michael Jackson was included in the In Memoriam segment the same year Fawcett was left out but Jackson was an Oscar nominee. Charlbi Dean, Tom Sizemore, Paul Sorvino are the most glaring omissions. Gilbert Gottfried and Anne Heche were featured in 2022’s In Memoriam segment at the Emmys.

          • electricsheep198-av says:

            No, I know.  We’re just very protective of him.  lol

          • lmh325-av says:

            I can kind of understand Sizemore potentially missing the telecast because the death was so recent, but it’s still a surprise that if that were the case they wouldn’t mention it –  I believe that happened in the last few years where a notable death happened right before the awards and they said it prior to the segment.

          • keykayquanehamme-av says:

            Tough to buy “stretched for time” when there were portions of the In Memoriam segment where no one was featured on the screen behind the performance. That’s literally a situation where the performer is secondary to the performance and the performance is secondary to the individuals being featured… So other than a black screen at the beginning and at the end, we literally didn’t “need” anything to happen that they didn’t have time for as long as they had time to have blank space on the screen after the song started.

          • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

            The stretched for time argument would carry a lot more weight if they didn’t waste so much of it on other utterly useless stuff. A mere five more minutes would avoid a lot of this plus a team who just had to spend a bit of time during each year keeping track of this. We go through this every single year and you have to wonder if they’re being deliberately obtuse about it since it just keeps happening. It’s very disrespectful to people that they can’t do a much better job than this in recognising them and their years of work for just a few seconds each if nothing else.

          • surprise-surprise-av says:

            It’s an awards show, not a memorial. That “utterly useless stuff” is what 99% of viewers are tuning in for. 

          • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

            I refuse to believe they can’t jettison 5 minutes of utterly useless stuff which even the viewers wouldn’t miss and also don’t want to see (given by their feedback mentioning they didn’t want to see it) just to spend a few seconds of time per person for all those decades combined that these people contributed to the industry.Leaving out a main actor from one of this year’s Best Picture nominees is a colossal fuck up no matter how you slice it for starters.

          • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

            I refuse to believe they can’t jettison 5 minutes of utterly useless stuff which even the viewers wouldn’t miss and also don’t want to see (given by their feedback mentioning they didn’t want to see it) just to spend a few seconds of time per person for all those decades combined that these people contributed to the industry.Leaving out a main actor from one of this year’s Best Picture nominees is a colossal fuck up no matter how you slice it for starters.

          • bcfred2-av says:

            Plus they had 15 seconds to show Sizemore, Sorvino and Dean.  Sizemore led a messed up life but was in some all-time classics and always brought it.  I agree that Heche might have been left out since she died committing a potential felony.

          • ajvia12-av says:

            Post-report revealed NO drugs or alcohol in her system. She was having a psychotic episode, possibly, or medically-induced event (seizure?). But she was not the coked-out speed demon it appeared as initially. Very sad since she will likely be rememebered that way unfairly.

          • ajvia12-av says:

            Seriously, they can hire me. I’ll work ONE single day, use “Google” and identify every dead celebrity in the year past. It’s really, really not that hard. I could come up with 30% of em off the top of my head and the rest on the inter-netz.
            Like, jesus, someone was paid to coordinate a flyover with fighter jets, and organize a new carpet color, and put together 125K gift bags but you can’t get “Who Died from Our World” even remotely right.

          • 756kraken-av says:

            Philip Baker Hall and Melinda Dillon were more glaring omissions than the late Charlbi Dean, who did excellent work in Triangle of Sadness, but wasn’t known for any other films (and really was far more obscure than any of the actors who were in the In Memoriam).

      • cinecraf-av says:

        I have to wonder if the circumstances of her death had something to do with it.  She very nearly killed people with her behavior, and that may have left a bad taste in people’s mouths when it came time to decide who to commemorate.  

        • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

          Maybe Anne Heche was having a medical emergency and/or a mental health crisis. We don’t know and they didn’t either. In that case, I honestly can’t see the harm in just mentioning that she died.

        • ajvia12-av says:

          And, incidentally- and importantly- tested NEGATIVE for any substances in her system. She was having a mental health breakdown, yes, that sounds true, but she actually was not a DWI-crazed house-crasher in the end. Hard to imagine no one in Hollywood wanted to acknowledge “Mental illness” being a thing…Worth repeating since we often only remember the worst thing about someone when they’re gone, and in 5 yrs it’s a punchline to something and is undeserved. Sad, and don’t even get me started on leaving Sizemore and Sorvino out of the thing.

      • chronoboy-av says:

        I wonder if it had to do with her bizarre and gruesome death. 

    • scortius-av says:

      this is why they should just cut it altogether or add literally everyone and have the audience sit there mourning for an hour.

    • cosmicghostrider-av says:

      I don’t think Halyna Hutchins made the broadcast last year. 

      • electricsheep198-av says:

        Ouch. And she didn’t even make the lists complaining about who didn’t make it.  That’s pretty glaring.

  • deb03449a1-av says:

    I had no idea Syonide passed away. That sucks.

  • yesidrivea240-av says:

    Gilbert Gottfried is probably the most glaring omission. I mean, they all are to some extent, but he’s by far the biggest name they missed.

    • Mobotropolis-av says:

      Felt like if anyone was intentionally omitted, it was him.

    • lmh325-av says:

      I mean Paul Sorvino and Tom Sizemore contributed more to film than Gottfried…

      • tvcr-av says:

        I’d like to remind you of a little film called Problem Child.

      • bc222-av says:

        The Academy’s efforts to make people forget that Mira Sorvino won an Oscar has officially gone too far…

      • yesidrivea240-av says:

        I’m a fan of Sizemore and I’m disappointed he wasn’t included, but I’m not sure if he contributed more to film than Gottfried. Paul Sorvino, yeah sure I’ll agree to that.

        • lmh325-av says:

          Sizemore’s 90’s run has been overshadowed by his personal struggles – True Romance, Natural Born Killers, Heat, Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down – He contributed to some fairly iconic films. Gottfried certainly contributed more to comedy and pop culture. End of the day, they should both have been in it (and I think I’ve since seen that Gottfried was in last years?), but I think if the Academy is going to use the metric they used with Farah Fawcett about contributions specifically to films, Sizemore probably edges him out.

        • ajvia12-av says:

          Well, Gottfried did kill it in that scene in SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, who can forget him playing w/ Tom Hanks and agreeing that he would go wherever his captain went? Gets me welled up everytime I picture Gilbert w/ his tobacco chaw and the twinkle in his eye…and who can forget when Gilbert took down that bank in HEAT…just great stuff…

          • yesidrivea240-av says:

            *rolls eyes*Like I said, I’m a big Sizemore fan, but his best work was 25 years ago. Gottfried stayed in the public spotlight for significantly longer and continued working throughout the aughts and 2010’s.

      • jomahuan-av says:

        not if you count aladdin

    • camillamacaulay-av says:

      Richard Belzer was left out as well, which seems like a glaring omission.

  • gallagwar1215-av says:

    It’s amazing to me that they continue to mess up what should be an extremely simple exercise. You can find a list of people in the industry who passed away in the past year very easily.  Just go on Wikipedia for crying out loud.  Especially a person who is the star of a nominated film.  How do you leave out Paul Sorvino and Tom Sizemore??? What would it be, 35 seconds longer to include these worthy inclusions?

    • bc222-av says:

      Seriously, every year should just be a scroll of the wikipedia page, set to “I Will Remember You.” There’d be fewer complaints.

      • bio-wd-av says:

        The song choices are sometimes baffling.  The year that Doris Day died, Que Sara Sara was the literal perfect song to sing in a mournful manner.  They didn’t and I don’t know why.  They went with Yesterday for reasons I can’t fathom.  

  • cosmicghostrider-av says:

    We were all on our phones checking deceased dates cuz we were a bit confused by the In Memorium section.

  • cinecraf-av says:

    It was a really big shame they left out Charlbi Dean. She was the standout of Triangle, and her sudden death leaves so very many what-ifs in terms of what work we might have gotten from her had she lived.

    • scruffy-the-janitor-av says:

      Definitely feels pretty cruel to leave out the main actress in a film nominated for Best Picture this year.

      • cinecraf-av says:

        The only thing I can think is that maybe the powers that be thought she hadn’t had enough of a cinema career yet, since the bulk of her resume up to Triangle was television or video.  But it’s still a stupid rationale.  As you note, when you are a lead actor in a movie up for Best Picture, you’ve earned a seat at the table, and deserve the consideration.  

    • camillamacaulay-av says:

      She was incredible in Triangle of Sadness. I predicted she would be the next Margot Robbie – stunningly gorgeous and super talented.  So, so sad.  

  • bio-wd-av says:

    They left out Larry Storch who died at 99 last year. He made countless films and its a shame to see he left out.  If only the Academy did as good as TCM when it comes to the in memoriam. 

    • katanahottinroof-av says:

      I hoped for a lot of years that Robert Osborne would get to host the Academy Awards, just once.

      • bio-wd-av says:

        Man that would have been perfect.  The best we could hope for now is Oscar Noir hosted by Eddie Mueller.

    • dr-darke-av says:

      Yes, but does anybody remember Larry Storch except for the television series F TROOP? I don’t think Robert Vaughn was commemorated the year he died either, and he also did a bunch of movies—but as far as everybody’s concerned, the only thing that matters is he was Napoleon Solo on THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E.I have a feeling the same thing will happen when David McCallum eventually steps on the rainbow, and he was in The Great Escape.

  • gargsy-av says:

    “bad (Jimmy Kimmel bothering a Nobel Peace Prize winner)‘

    Oh, fuck off.

  • bikebrh-av says:

    I’m sure they left out Heche because of the circumstances of her death. Same reason they left out Robert Blake. If you were famously a murderous shithead in life(Blake), or died doing something extremely shitty, endangering other people (Heche), you might not get honored.

    • gargsy-av says:

      “or died doing something extremely shitty, endangering other people (Heche)“

      Yeah, all those pieces of shit who have mental health issues, they shouldn’t be respected after they die.

      Also? Fuck you, get fucked to death you fucking piece of trash.

    • Ara_Richards-av says:

      Yeah she almost killed someone, no way in hell there were going to mention her, it would have been real shitty to the people whose house she destroyed.

    • ohnoray-av says:

      Heche’s toxicology report had her not impaired at the time, so it seemed she was in a psychosis (who knows if it was drug induced from a few days prior). Regardless, she seemed very much a product of a tough childhood and an industry that traumatized her even more. Just a reminder of the complicit nature of Hollywood being like “meh”.

      • bikebrh-av says:

        Someone refusing to take care of their known mental issues is not a mitigating circumstance, in my opinion. If she had lived she would have been arrested and convicted of a Felony, and if I was the judge I would have thrown the book at her.

        • ohnoray-av says:

          responses like these, where people “throw books” at those struggling instead of taking some accountability in providing some actual humanity, is why mental illness episodes are higher than ever. the woman is dead, keep tossing that book at the sky.

        • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

          I’m a mental health doctor and understating it greatly, it’s not even remotely as simple as that. For starters, some people are refractory to treatment and can become increasingly so over their lives despite our best efforts even when they do their best to comply with treatment. We don’t know and I doubt people who are in the business of making films are in a position to know either.

        • ajvia12-av says:

          well thank god you’re not a judge then, since you have a rather simplistic view of thingsshe had no substances in her system. could have been a medical episode or mental health episode, but the underlying sentiment there would be “not a choice she made to crash into a house”god help you and your loved ones, that you or they never have any tragedies that others can smarmishly judge and decide without any real knowledge on.

      • camillamacaulay-av says:

        Probably the same reason they snubbed Corey Haim and Brad Renfro.  They don’t like to be reminded of their complicity. 

  • seven-deuce-av says:

    Sacheen Littlefeather did not deserve a tribute. She faked her Native American heritage and was barely an actress.

  • mykinjaa-av says:

    Those deaths wouldn’t pan well with the demographic who still watches awards shows…
    1) They wouldn’t know who that young lady is and…
    2) Because gay.

  • thegobhoblin-av says:

    I like to think Gilbert Gottfried recorded a reaction to getting snubbed in the In Memoriam segment.

    • fanburner-av says:

      “What the fuck do I have to do to get into this thing? Fucking die??!! Fuck those guys with their golden dildos anyway.”If there is an afterlife, Gilbert is there making it a little filthier every day, and I think that’s a beautiful legacy.

  • drpumernickelesq-av says:

    In fairness, how can they be expected to recognize Fred Ward, Melinda Dillon, or Philip Baker Hall when they need to have a five minute advertisement for The Little Mermaid in the middle of the broadcast, as well as Jimmy Kimmel pestering Malala for far too long?

    • hankdolworth-av says:

      On the plus side, they managed to cut out the extra song and dance numbers that no one actually wanted.

    • bio-wd-av says:

      God that was painful with Malala.  She’s had a pretty rough recent few years with Afghanistan and all that oh don’t bring her into Don’t Worry Darling please. 

      • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

        Most significantly when someone shot her in the head with the intent to kill her just because she was advocating for basic rights. Really drives home how insignificant all of these things are at best compared to all these terrible things happening (and are still happening).

    • breadnmaters-av says:

      Because of your comment I just looked at that. Jfc, I hate Hollywood. 

  • magpie187-av says:

    They could have done Sorvino & Liotta in the same clip. The scene where Paul is smacking Henry telling him not to sell junk would have been great.

    • bio-wd-av says:

      I like to imagine Sorvino flexed his shoulders all confused like in heaven just like when that guy tells him Henry could be a bar stool if he stays any longer.

  • tom614-av says:

    How hard is this job. Pick one guy that’s going to compile and edit the segment. From Day 1 look in the paper and if anyone in the industry passed away WRITE DOWN THE NAME@ When it’s time to edit it all together, check your list, and don’t leave out anyone. Some of the names they miss or leave out are unforgivable. 

  • apewhohathnoname-av says:

    Maria Louise Cruz, “Sacheen Littlefeather,” was a liar and a fraud.

  • kirrich-av says:

    Nothing is perfect and certainly the Oscars will surely make mistakes or omissions. However, one must think on the bright side. It has only been since…uh…last March since the Oscars made some! So, give ‘em a break.  😉

  • tlhotsc247365-av says:

    Man I get he was mostly stage and voice overs, but come on show some love for Kevin Conroy!

  • 3rdshallot-av says:

    I love how your headline contradicts your subline (is that a word?). “cut” != excluded. get an editor.

  • smittywerbenjagermanjensen22-av says:

    They left out FRED WARD???Motherfuckers

  • rafterman00-av says:

    They should just cut the segment entirely, as there will always be complaints.

    • bobfunch1-on-kinja-av says:

      Put it in the Technical Oscars – and broadcast the Technical Oscars Live on TCM!

      • cosmicghostrider-av says:

        Well now I feel bad, did a bunch of other people fast forward from best supporting actor/actress straight to best director like we did? Stopping only to watch The Whale steal makeup from The Batman.

        Well damn.

    • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

      Alternatively, they could try to not spectacularly fuck up every single year. How fucking hard is it to have a couple of people compile a list during the year as a very short part of their working week and then double check it a few times in the weeks leading up to the ceremony. I mean the AV Club here would do a much better job of it for starters.

      • ajvia12-av says:

        LOL The AV Club cannot do anything better than anything or anyone else these days, but thats a whole different ballgame…

    • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

      Alternatively, they could try to not spectacularly fuck up every single year. How fucking hard is it to have a couple of people compile a list during the year as a very short part of their working week and then double check it a few times in the weeks leading up to the ceremony. I mean the AV Club here would do a much better job of it for starters.

  • coolhandtim-av says:

    Could it be possible that the families didn’t want them on there? I mean, someone DOES check with the families, right?

  • jimbeazy-av says:

    William Hurt won an Oscar – no mention – horrible… Google “What Oscar winners died in the past year” it’s the least you can do…

  • capricorn60-av says:

    My understanding is that each academy branch has a member committee that selects which luminaries are included in the Memoriam section. I’d bet that many of these members are too young to remember actors from the 70s and 80s ( two-time nominee Melinda Dillon) or the 60s (Stella Stevens). They seem to do a worse job every year.

  • donnation-av says:

    The most glaring omission? FFS, stop with the Charlbi Dean faux outrage. She was barely in any movies and the one she was nominated in this year 99.9% of the people bitching out her omission didn’t see it. I think it’s honestly an acceptable mistake. What’s not is forgivable is forgetting Paul Sorvino. Guy was a film legend. Also, dumbass, Tom Sizemore just died.  The Oscars in Memorial is for people who died the previous year, not people up and to the awards show.  

    • camillamacaulay-av says:

      Oh, please. Charlbi Dean’s face was on the actual freaking POSTER the Academy was using that night for Triangle of Sadness. It’s an idiotic omission.

  • nilus-av says:

    Sacheen “Littlefeather” was not a notable omission. She was in less then ten movies in like a 5 years in the 70s. The only reason she was “famous” was the crap with Brando’s Oscar and because she was a pretendianActual notable omissions you missed were David Warner and Burt Ward

  • circlesky-av says:

    I get that the Oscars doesn’t want the In Memorium reel to just be a list of actors and directors that died.  It is nice that they include tech people, agents, and publicity people.  But leaving out Paul Sorvino when he and Ray Liotta could have been honored side by side in a film clip from Goodfellas is just dumb.

  • 756kraken-av says:

    Just use a pre-recorded instrumental over the photos, removing the needless cutaways to the performers, and show three photos at a time, always, even for big stars… that alone will make room for a number more names.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin