To save itself, Homeland had to get over the loss of its leading man

TV Features Homeland
To save itself, Homeland had to get over the loss of its leading man
Art Malik, Raza Jaffrey, and Nimrat Kaur Photo:

Previously on Homeland

Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes) ranks among the CIA’s most talented intelligence analysts, dedicating most waking moments to thwarting the next major terrorist attack on American soil. But a pair of secrets threatens to derail her hopelessly tangled personal and professional lives.

The first is that Carrie suffers from bipolar depression, a potentially career-ending condition she conceals from her Langley superiors, including pragmatic-to-a-fault Saul Berenson (Mandy Patinkin). She manages her condition with clandestine meds from her M.D. sister Maggie (Amy Hargreaves), but also thinks it can be a gift when appropriately harnessed, and wonders if her next manic flight could yield a game-changing counter-terrorism insight.

The second and more pressing secret is her dogged suspicion that Nicholas Brody (Damian Lewis), an Army sergeant discovered alive after eight years under al-Qaeda captivity, is turncoat. The series begins with Carrie creating a diplomatic incident by bribing her way into an Afghan prison to talk to a local asset about to be executed. His final words, whispered into her ear as the guards yank her away, will change the course of her life: “An American prisoner of war has been turned.” Naturally, Carrie is suspicious when a rescue team extracts Brody long after he could have produced valuable information for the enemy.

Saul, Carrie’s closest ally within the agency, is unsettled by her nascent theory, but won’t sign off on the invasive surveillance she wants, especially as Brody is greeted with a hero’s welcome. Ever the maverick, Carrie installs cameras in Brody’s home and monitors them on her off-hours, peering into private moments as Brody integrates himself back into a family that had assumed he was dead. Carrie’s off-the-books operation runs out of funding, but she’s more obsessed with Brody than ever, the consequence of a one-sided intimacy formed through hours of watching him.

Carrie’s fixation on Brody accelerates from passive surveillance to contrived in-person interactions, and finally, to a perilous sexual affair. Despite her deepening feelings for Brody, Carrie continues to search for evidence that he remains under the sway of the charismatic terrorist Abu Nazir (Navid Negahban). A near-death experience triggers her mania, which leads to a breakthrough about Brody’s true motivations, but also exposes her condition to the agency. An unemployed and discredited Carrie still manages to thwart Brody’s terrorist attack–which would have killed most of the presidential succession line–but is unable to expose him as the culprit.


In the beginning…

Few shows in the past decade have debuted with the kind of instant critical acclaim and cultural resonance that greeted Homeland in October 2011. The brisk and thrilling first season won four Emmys: an Outstanding Actress In A Drama statue for Danes (who’s been camping in the category ever since); Outstanding Actor for Lewis; and for the show, Outstanding Writing and Outstanding Drama Series. Homeland also took the top drama award at the Golden Globes, won a Peabody, and was talked up by President Obama as his newest cultural obsession.

By the end of the tortured third season, Homeland had mostly dropped off the Emmy radar, with only Danes and Patinkin nominated. More than that, Homeland was being talked about as a show that was doomed by the instant success of a story that felt self-contained and self-limiting. The less charitable explanation was that the show had become too reliant on unearned plot twists and had mired itself in Carrie and Brody’s romantic quagmire. Troubleshooting the show became a new national pastime for television critics.

Understanding why Homeland followed its parabolic trajectory requires a closer look at its source material. Homeland was based on Hatufim, an Israeli drama that ran for two seasons comprising 24 episodes. While Hatufim has thriller elements, it’s primarily a domestic ensemble drama. Nimrod (Yoram Toledano) and Uri (Ishai Golan) are two Israeli military prisoners freed by their government with a prisoner swap. How would they ever relate to their loved ones, some of whom had been preparing for a life without them? How would they navigate the guilt, anxiety, and survivor’s remorse?

Homeland would become a distinctly different narrative as a result of who adapted it. 20th Century Fox bought the Hatufim pilot and hired Howard Gordon and Alex Gansa, who’d previously worked together on the whiplash-inducing terrorism thriller 24. They localized the story by rooting it in post-9/11 paranoid and fears around how Osama bin Laden’s ideology could metastasize in the wake of his assassination.

But the biggest change they made was supercharging Haim—the psychiatrist with suspicions about Nimrod and Uri—by turning him into Carrie Mathison, a more cerebral and nuanced version of Jack Bauer character Gordon and Gansa wrote for so many years. Like Jack before her, Carrie would be instinctual, resolute, and constantly coloring outside the lines. The Homeland pilot is a potent character study of Carrie, the vigilant intelligence officer fraying at the seams and single-minded about preventing the next domestic terror attack. Much of what comes to define the character is proffered up front: Carrie’s mental illness and her attempts to hide it; her love of hard bop and stiff drinks; and her habit of seducing her way out of trouble.

Brody is richly drawn too, with good reason, given that the character absorbs elements of both the Nimrod and Uri characters. But whereas Hatufim was all about the former prisoners’ emotional states, in Homeland, Carrie is the one with all the interiority. Brody remains opaque for much of the first season while the mystery of his reappearance unfurls. As a result, the audience is forced to empathize with Carrie, the only person savvy enough to keep a gimlet eye on Brody even as a cheerful propaganda campaign springs up around him. Factor in Danes’ muscular, intense performance, and it’s no surprise the show skews in Carrie’s direction. Brody would soon be identified as the show’s dead weight—the foolish choice made repeatedly by an otherwise smart woman.

For all its nuanced characterization, Homeland quickly becomes a story about a “good” girl trying to take down a “bad” guy. Rebalancing the show in favor of Carrie supercharged the show’s storytelling, putting her and Brody on a collision course that could only end with one of them dead or in jail. But the strategy also made Brody expendable. That wasn’t an unanticipated consequence for Howard and Gansa, who reportedly planned to have Brody complete his suicide mission, only for Showtime brass to intervene and insist Lewis was too valuable to lose.

Season two resumes six months later, with Carrie in professional exile, only to be dragged back into the intelligence world when Saul corroborates her theory about Brody. Despite Brody’s current hero status, Saul and Carrie launch a task force to take him down, enlisting stoic company man Peter Quinn (Rupert Friend) to run point on a sting built around Carrie and Brody’s fraught emotional bond. What’s intended as a disciplined, methodical operation hits terminal velocity when Carrie confronts Brody about his terroristic intentions and turns him against his handlers.

Most storylines in Homeland accelerate wildly, the result of a deliberate strategy by Howard and Gansa to jolt the audience. They spoke in season one postmortems about their theory that contemporary television viewers had become too savvy, and would probably see the plot twists coming. The only way to surprise, they concluded, was to do what the audience expected to happen eventually, but at a much faster pace.

But by the back half of season two, Homeland’s thrilling pace began to feel like the result of the narrative equivalent of deficit spending. The season’s fifth episode, “Q&A,” remains among the show’s finest episodes. Danes and Lewis are invariably excellent together, and the scenes in which Carrie compassionately interrogates Brody are nearly perfect. (Executive producer Henry Bromell won a posthumous Emmy for writing the teleplay.) But as soon as Carrie and Brody are fighting on the same side and openly dating, their story hits the same patch of inertia as does the will-they-won’t-they romance in an office sitcom. The relationship pulls the most focus at the exact moment it becomes dramatically inert.

Fears about the show’s direction solidified early in season three. Brody is flapping in the wind and Abu Nazir is dead after the latter masterminded one final attack on the CIA, killing much of the agency’s leadership structure and leaving Brody to take the fall. The uncertainty around Brody’s future made his story feel at once beyond its usefulness, and in serious need of resolution.

Without Brody in custody, the heat for the cataclysmic attack falls on Carrie, who gets publicly outed for her illicit relationship with the main suspect. Neither one of the show’s leads is effectively present, between Brody’s scofflaw status and Carrie in a darker place than she’d ever been. She suffers a breakdown after being backed over by the agency, including Saul, who callously implicates Carrie at a televised congressional hearing. But what looks to the audience like Carrie’s abandonment and descent into madness turns out to be a ruse cooked up with Saul to convince a hostile foreign power that Carrie could be compromised.

That arc sparked a targeted backlash from critics, who accused the show of crossing the boundaries of good faith with its narrative sleight-of-hand. In addition to being poorly conceived, the storyline was ill-timed, absorbing the first four episodes of the season. For anyone already put off by season two’s antics, it seemed as if Homeland might never overcome its worst instincts. The season improbably builds to a thrilling and poignant end, with Brody receiving a martyr’s death after pulling off one final mission for his country. Carrie will keep a part of Brody with her after his death, as their final dalliance resulted in a pregnancy she intends to take to term.


The peak season

Homeland was in desperate need of a rebuilding season when it returned in October 2014. “Of course it’s painful and it hurts,” said Gansa to the Los Angeles Times of the critical drubbing season three took. “Hopefully we can get back to the mountaintop again.” To do that, Gansa and his team had to stop telling the audience Carrie Mathison was an international terrorist hunter and actually show her doing it. The Carrie of current Homeland seasons is more comfortable skulking around internecine hot zones than living a placid domestic life. But prior to season four, there was woefully little of that character on display.

The season premiere, “The Drone Queen,” finds Carrie heading up the field office in Kabul, Afghanistan and running point on the long-distance strikes that earned her the half-admiring, half-snide nickname of the title. She’s using Skype to stay connected to family, but the physical distance allows her to avoid the maternal responsibilities she feels ill-equipped to handle. Carrie receives tantalizing intelligence from Islamabad station chief Sandy Bachman (Corey Stoll) on the location of infamous Taliban leader Haissam Haqqani (Numan Acar). She authorizes a drone attack at the coordinates Sandy specifies, only to find out the location is the venue for a large wedding. Haqqani isn’t there, but plenty of his family members are, and 40 civilians are killed in the strike.

The errant drone strike reverberates when one of its survivors, a young medical student named Aayan Ibrahim (Suraj Sharma), allows an incendiary video clip to fall into the wrong hands. Aayan was a wedding guest, recording with his cell phone seconds before the missile hit. He unwittingly captures the exact moment the joyous wedding becomes a funeral pyre, and a rabble-rousing friend uploads the footage to YouTube, setting in motion a crescendo of events that ends with Sandy beaten to death by an angry mob. Carrie strong-arms her way into the newly vacant role as Islamabad bureau chief, then enlists Quinn to help her trace Sandy’s tip back to its source and determine Pakistani intelligence’s role in the purportedly spontaneous riot that killed him.

The plot is knottier and more complex than anything Homeland had done before. Carrie is still American foreign policy made flesh, but the show changes from a meditation on how the war on terror changed America into an exploration of the global consequences of fighting it. Carrie’s unorthodox methods are now in service of a mission that puts innocents in harm’s way as often as it makes them safer. This compromised version of Carrie is often called to account for the wreckage left in the wake of her well-intentioned choices. In the premiere, Carrie is confronted in a bar by the soldier who piloted the drone, who’s just learned the payload he released incinerated a wedding. “Monsters, all of you,” says the guilt-wracked soldier to his superior. She gives him a steely response, but she’s shaken by the exchange, and her reckoning is just beginning.

Carrie is forced to make a gaggle of wrenching, no-win decisions, several of which have lasting ramifications for Homeland’s foundational relationship. While Carrie and Brody’s torrid affair blazed in the foreground, Carrie and Saul’s quasi-paternal mentorship was simmering in the background. In season four, their unique partnership is pulled into focus and tested like never before. She’s conflicted when he shows up at her Islamabad post unannounced, even though it’s mostly a social call. Saul has since departed the agency for a cushy gig as a private security contractor, but Carrie is still worried her new team will think she’s called in a powerful ally for help. He finally takes the hint and goes to depart Islamabad, only to be intercepted by Haqqani’s men and held captive for the bulk of the season.

The story of Saul’s kidnapping and eventual rescue is key to the success of season four. Homeland, at its best, takes complex geopolitical issues and turns them into deftly written and acted conversations between two characters. The zenith of season one is “The Weekend,” the episode most known for Carrie and Brody’s fateful cabin trip. But the secondary plot is all about Saul, who advances an investigation by conducting a patient, empathetic interrogation with an American suspected in a terror plot, played by Marin Ireland. Those scenes became something of a template for Homeland, and Saul’s kidnapping replicates that template with the dynamic reversed. Now it’s Saul as the captive, trying to find the right combination of words that will keep him alive under extreme duress. But Saul’s captivity only ends if he dies, or the U.S. pays his freight by freeing Taliban prisoners who could go on to carry out deadly attacks. Saul makes clear he doesn’t want to be rescued at the cost of freeing dangerous detainees and won’t allow Haqqani to turn his capture into propaganda.

Saul’s prideful stance puts him at odds with Carrie, who’s determined to bring him home at all costs. But the road to Saul’s safe return is riddled with obstacles. In “From A To B And Back Again,” Carrie manipulates Aayan to get him to lead to Haqqani, Aayan’s uncle. Carrie is initially fine with using a drone to take out Haqqani even if it means killing Aayan, whose innocence Carrie has already compromised with an on-the-job seduction. She holds back when Haqqani reveals Saul as his captive, but is ignited again when Haqqani casually murders Aayan. Carrie demands the drone take the shot—Saul’s life be damned—but is talked back from the ledge by Quinn. (Executive producer Lesli Linka Glatter took home an Emmy for Outstanding Direction for her work on the episode.)

Two episodes later, Saul manages a short-lived escape. After slipping his captors, he reaches Carrie with a satellite phone and presents her with a wrenching decision: either lead him out of harm’s way, or allow him to avoid further embarrassment by taking his own life. Just as Saul has concluded death is the only way out, Carrie convinces him she’s found a path to safety. But it’s all a ruse, like the many Carrie and Saul had sprung on so many others. Her turn-by-turn directions lead Saul back into the hands of his captors, an imperfect solution that leaves him in harm’s way, but still alive. Saul screams and curses at Carrie upon realizing she lied to him in a gut-wrenching scene.

The season should feel skeletal with Brody dead and Saul missing in action, but Homeland restocked its cast by adding excellent recurring characters and breathing new life into familiar faces on the periphery. Acar is brilliantly sinister as Haqqani, and he’s well matched by Sharma, whose delicate performance as Aayan made an impression that long outlasted the character’s life. Nazanin Boniadi was promoted to the regular cast as thoughtful yet timid CIA analyst Fara Sherazi. Though her character doesn’t make it through the season, Fara’s memory is carried forward by Max Piotrowski (Maury Sterling), a tech wizard who starts Homeland with barely any dialogue and slowly turns into the show’s beating, broken heart.

But the best new character is Tasneem Qureishi (Nimrat Kaur), a Pakistani intelligence officer who schemes to get Carrie ejected from her post before she can finish tracing Sandy’s calamitous tip back to its source. To carry out the plan, she recruits Dennis Boyd (Mark Moses), the intelligence source Sandy Bachman had been keeping under wraps. Tasneem blackmails Dennis into compromising the medication keeping Carrie’s mania at bay while working covertly to influence the prisoner trade. Homeland has long excelled at folding nighttime soap-style plots into its batter, and with the Tasneem and Dennis subplot, the show takes on the contours of a show like Dallas, complete with poisonings and professional sabotage. Kaur’s shrewd performance left such an impression that she was brought back as a regular for the show’s final season seven.

Homeland season four still has its missteps, including an early scene in which Carrie submerges her daughter in bathwater before changing her mind about drowning her child. (Gansa dubiously explained that the scene was edited to leave room for a less literal interpretation.) A slight blowback greeted the seventh episode, “Redux,” in which Carrie suffers a mental break (due to Tasneem’s skullduggery) and appears to wind up in Brody’s comforting arms. Turns out it’s not actually Brody, but Aasar Kham (Raza Jaffrey), Carrie’s Pakistani counterpart and her unlikely ally. Even though Homeland didn’t actually resurrect Brody, the brief appearance was an uncomfortable jolt for anyone relieved to be rid of him.

But for all its faults, the fourth season of Homeland represents the peak of the show’s strengths, achieved as a direct result of expanding it beyond The Carrie And Brody Show. Homeland became riskier, tenser, and more potent when it finally abandoned Brody, and the show’s insights about the global war on terror only got sharper once it left American soil.

38 Comments

  • oopec-av says:

    This show would’ve been a great one-and-done. But it kept going. And fell victim to Showtime’s “Why would we cancel this show?!” policy (Looking at you Shameless, Dexter, Nurse Jackie, Weeds, Ray Donovan, and all the other shows that went on a shockingly long amount of time)
    The quality dip from one to two was huge. By mid-season 3 I was out, and yet this show continued. I didn’t even make it to Lewis’ death because well before then, I no longer cared.

    • doobie1-av says:

      I think what they should have done is refocused on day-to-day spycraft. The best parts of the show have always been those moments when they take other governments and intelligence agencies seriously as people, showing just how a mix of arrogance, selfishness, and suspicion can combine to create an atmosphere that makes it nearly impossible to arrive at mutually beneficial conclusions.

      But because the stakes always have to be 1,000% XTREME, Carrie is constantly going rogue, having mental breakdowns, and still somehow being left alone in charge of the most highly sensitive shit imaginable (and even that would be almost acceptable if it were a commentary on how badly mismanaged intelligence agencies are in the field, but we’re supposed to be rooting for her).

      So it’s 1/2 nuanced political drama and 1/2 bonkers Jerry Bruckheimer film, and they don’t go together all that well.

      • oopec-av says:

        It’s premium cable 24.

        • blpppt-av says:

          Homeland never got to the level of S4-S5 24 IMHO.

          • oopec-av says:

            I would agree with that! 24 never got back to that point, either! I dropped during Season 6 because it was terrible compared to how good the previous season was!

          • wastrel7-av says:

            I dropped out of 24 during S3, because it was much worse than S2, which was much worse than S1. Glimpses I saw of later seasons did not convince me I’d been wrong…

          • blpppt-av says:

            I actually thought S1 was mostly boring, so much so I stopped watching the entire series until years later when the teasers about a nuke plant meltdown started airing (for S4), then I caught up on the earlier seasons.I think I got up to the episode where they’re hiding in the barn when I quit watching S1 the first time.S4 & 5 are great—especially 5, which is almost universally recognized as the best season, with the great, great Greg Itzin’s character in the forefront. You’d do well IMHO, to watch them now.

          • blpppt-av says:

            Seasons 7, 8 were much better than s6, but I’d agree it never got back to the great 2-5 seasons’ peak again.The 12 ep ‘mini-24′ “Live another Day” a few years back was very reminiscent of prime 24, though, I will say that. 

      • dirtside-av says:

        So it’s 1/2 nuanced political drama and 1/2 bonkers Jerry Bruckheimer film, and they don’t go together all that well.This is exactly what I’ve been saying for years! Well, I phrased it as “half spy fantasy nonsense, half nuanced character study,” but same principle. We kept up through season 6 (the one that ends with Quinn dying) but decided the show was just too stressful and repetitive to keep watching.

      • themadnessofitall-av says:

        Carrie is constantly going rogue, having mental breakdowns, and still somehow being left alone in charge of the most highly sensitive shit imaginableSounds like Donald Trump, so sure, it can happen. 

    • ohnoray-av says:

      A lot of shows I forget afterwards, Homeland was spectacular in season 1, and I remember so much of the plot etc. years after. But I fell off exactly the same time as you, and never made it to his death either. 

    • wastrel7-av says:

      Homeland went wrong after S1 because the showrunners didn’t understand what their show was about.
      The first season is all about the Patriot Act surveillance state. Brody is the nonconformist element that irrationally scares us: he’s intentionally a cypher for us to project our feelings onto, and everything is designed so that his actions can be interpreted in two different ways: as an honest but troubled man, struggling with PTSD and alienated by the knowledge that the society he fought for doesn’t fully trust him; or as a broken man brainwashed into fanatical hatred of his country, plotting an attack. He looks guilty, but we can’t work out what he’s guilty of or why, so we feel guilty about prejudging him.Meanwhile, Carrie is the police state gone mad – not only does she break her own guidelines and go rogue, but at times she’s clearly less interested in preventing terrorism than she is in her own voyeuristic obsession with Brody’s life. She’s our worst nightmare about unchecked state power – not that she’s evil, but just that she has way too much power, with neither society nor the government nor her superiors able or willing to reign her in. But… what if she’s right? And her superiors themselves are a calculated blend of seemingly upright, and seemingly crooked, designed not just to provide a twisty thriller but also to feed into our paranoia. They’re as much a puzzle as Brody is.THAT was a fascinating show, while it lasted, and it almost deserved the awards it won. And watching them blow that show up in the first five or six episodes of S2, that was pretty thrilling.But realising that they were replacing that show – complicated and unsettling – with a cops-and-robbers knock-off of 24 was deeply disappointing.

  • pocketsander-av says:

    Every time I hear about Homeland coming to a close I keep thinking that I heard about this like 5 years ago.A definite example of a quality first season that was obviously intended to end differently initially. Maybe if they had kept that ending and not have us plod through the silly-ass S2 and 3 and gone straight to 4, but as it I only made it an episode or two into S4.

  • mosam-av says:

    Agree so much. Homeland gets overlooked a lot because of its roots, but it has turned into something masterful. Like the underloved “The Bridge” Homeland depended on foreign source material to tell a provocative story that drew in viewers, but then realized it had something much more profound to say. In its first few seasons Homeland (like the first season of the Bridge) is a pot-boiler built on suspense, sex, and violence. The latter seasons of Homeland (and the Bridge’s second season) expand the moral universe to ask much more interesting questions about America’s relationship to the world (or its neighbors) and the moral grayness behind the forces that keep the country “safe”.

    What I love most about latter-day Homeland is how it eludes easy answers.  It interrogates the worst, most nefarious parts of our spycraft and misguided foreign policy.  Yet, it also accurately points out that there are no great solutions if we discard the CIA.  (Same with the Bridge and the war on drugs.)

  • mpbourja-av says:

    I don’t understand who this piece is written for, or what its central purpose is.

  • blpppt-av says:

    “A cerebral/nuanced Jack Bauer”?I don’t think Carrie is much like Jack at all—-Jack is an action hero, Carrie is an analyst.The only thing similar about them is that people consistently doubt both Jack and Carrie, then realize later they were right.Actually, Quinn is (was) far more like Jack Bauer than Carrie.

    • robgrizzly-av says:

      Exactly. Carrie was closer to a female Jack Ryan than Jack Bauer

      • blpppt-av says:

        She has more in common, really, with a ‘strong willed’ Chloe than Jack.I’d argue Saul is more like the Jack Bauer character, just without the combat abilities.

  • dr-bombay-av says:

    It was a long slog to get through much of season 2 and all of 3. I mean, subbing Dana Brody for the worst bits from 24, Kim Bauer, was draining as hell along with Carrie’s sister and baby, teh custody fight, the breakdowns to really annoying jazz music. But I’m glad I stuck with it. It’s one of the few shows that have gone bad and regained some foothold. Yes, the last couple of seasons have had their eye-roll, disbelief-suspending moments. But, overall, it’s been pretty good stuff and this final season has been terrific.

  • robgrizzly-av says:

    But whereas Hatufim was all about the former prisoners’ emotional states, in Homeland,
    Carrie is the one with all the interiority. This just simply isn’t true. One of the reasons Season 1 worked so well (and is unquestionably their “peak” season- the series never got better than its first year), is that equal care was given to Brody’s trauma as much as there was for Carrie. When it started, Homeland was 100% a dual-lead show. And frankly, Brody was the more compelling character initially because integrating back into domestic life, and dealing with his family had the bulkier material. If he really was a traitor, how does he square with that? Carrie’s drama was a go-to of cliches for work-consumed protagonists (read: empty house and pills). Her stuff was elevated by Claire Danes being a phenomenal actress.
    Maybe I’m biased because I do think Homeland’s first season deserved all the praise it got. I even liked it better than Game of Thrones’ debut in 2011, and I’d argue it’s one of the strongest first seasons in tv history. All of this hinges on the relationship between two people on opposing sides. To claim it gets better when one of them is gone, is like saying Killing Eve will improve once cuts off half of that dynamic duo. That’s just not the show. Of course Brody had to die eventually (and his one appearance mid-season, as well as his last episode and the finale, are the only truly great hours of the sleepy season 3), but that’s where Homeland should have ended because it was always telling two stories. Once it became just about Carrie, it became just another CIA procedural.

  • recognitions-av says:

    https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/15/middleeast/homeland-grafitti-racist/index.htmlGotta say, any analysis of Homeland that completely elides the accusations of Islamophobia it’s gotten over the years feels a little dishonest.

    • theresnocheekslikemocheeks-av says:

      Question for you, and I’m not grilling you just curious because I’ve thought a lot about it as well. Do you think the Islamaphobia (whether real or perceived, not here to have that discussion, though we certainly can) is a byproduct of lazy writers who resort to tired stereotypes? Or are the writers being earnest in their view of our intelligence community, Government and to a (hopefully very limited, though I fear not) extent, society as a whole, about how they actually feel about Muslims in general?

      • recognitions-av says:

        I think that for reasons of myopia, calculated sale strategy, or some combination of the two, it’s very easy for television creators and executives to sell a show to Americans that largely show white Americans as heroes and Arabic-speaking Muslim characters with dark skin as murderous ideologues without ever engaging in more than a superficial examination of the circumstances that provoke the kind of terrorist actions dramatized in the show. If the showrunners are aware of how limited their depiction of Islam is, they’re still ok with it enough to sell it. Ultimately I don’t think the question is really relevant, as it’s the same effect either way.

    • mackyart-av says:

      I feel the same way. I was waiting for a mention of the criticism of Islamophobia in the show. Whether justifiable or not, I remember it being a lingering issue that the show constantly faced. I admit that I enjoy Homeland, but a short exploration of that criticism was needed in the article.

  • waylon-mercy-av says:

    I really like the Peak Season feature, and there should be way more of these:Desperate Housewives- Season 1.Stranger Things- Season 1.Fargo- Season 2.The Leftovers- Season 2.Buffy the Vampire Slayer- Season 3.Game of Thrones- Season 3.Breaking Bad- Season 4.
    The Office- Season 4.Fraiser- Season 5.Friends- Season 5.The Americans- Season 6.Parks and Recreation- Season 6.And lots more. Though I can’t think of many shows that peaked around year 7 or beyond. This length is generally where a clear decline has already set in.

    • blood-and-chocolate-av says:

      Parks had a strong run and I thought every season was great when I watched it live, but 6 is definitely not its peak.

  • elchappie2-av says:

    STOP. POSTING. SPOILERS. IN. HEADLINES!As an entertainment website, I think you would fucking know better.. 

  • moontheloon8-av says:

    Homeland was one of the best written and acted show for the first couple seasons, but pretty much lost me after Cody’s demise. I watched, begrudgingly through season 3 in case it improved. It didn’t…. It was just more of the same…Claire Danes’ ugly-crying histrionics plus uninteresting story lines got to be too much for me. When season 4 debuted, my wife turned it on and I just couldn’t watch. To put it plainly, I just lost interest.

  • squamateprimate-av says:

    Homeland was probably the most morally reprehensible CIA propaganda reel on TV until John Krasinski did that Jack Reacher bullshit. To get the support it did from the Agency, Homeland let a tie-wearing gang of election-fixers and child-killers co-write its scripts. It’s an interesting artifact of real-world evil.

  • rauth1334-av says:

    she has one expression. only one. 

  • cokes311-av says:

    Point of order: bipolar depression is not an accurate descriptor of what Carrie has, or what we see her dealing with most of the time. Bipolar depression is a term that refers to the depressive element of bipolar disorder, which also consists of mania, as a means of differentiating it from major depression.Sincerely,
    a therapist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin