C-

Vanessa Kirby simmers with grief in the loud but hollow Pieces Of A Woman

Film Reviews Movie Review
Vanessa Kirby simmers with grief in the loud but hollow Pieces Of A Woman

Image: Netflix

Note: The writer of this review watched Pieces Of A Woman on a digital screener from home. Before making the decision to see it—or any other film—in a movie theater, please consider the health risks involved. Here’s an interview on the matter with scientific experts.


Pieces Of A Woman, Hungarian director Kornél Mundruczó’s first English-language feature, opens with a bang, then immediately sputters. In its harrowing prologue, which depicts a home birth gone terribly wrong in one mesmerizing continuous take, we see a young couple, Martha (Vanessa Kirby) and Sean (Shia Labeouf), plunged into the sudden chaos of delivery. After nearly 23 minutes on edge, Martha holds her newborn baby in her arms for a few blinks of an eye before tragedy strikes and the opening title card hits the screen. The White God director’s latest is meant to be a portrait of grief in the aftermath of a staggering loss. The pain of mourning someone that never truly had a chance to live is complex, slippery, unimaginable. So unimaginable, in fact, that Mundruczó and screenwriter Kata Wéber seem to have difficulty imagining it themselves. The result is a clichéd maelstrom of psychological turmoil and empty outpourings of feeling. The film is uninterested in the inner world it claims to investigate; it also cheapens a woman’s trauma by rendering her pain into a confused dramatic spectacle.

After losing their child, our couple is haunted by the lack of closure. Medical examiners are unable to determine whether the midwife, Eva (Molly Parker), is responsible. Martha is withdrawn, severe, and frigid. To her husband and family’s horror, she insists upon donating her daughter’s body to science. Frustrated by his unresponsive wife, Sean grows violent, reverts to old, dangerous habits, and falls into bed with Martha’s cousin (Sarah Snook), an attorney who launches a criminal case against Eva. Kirby, who won the Best Actress prize at Venice for her efforts, delivers a bleeding heart of a performance. The childbirth scene is a tour de force: all wrenching facial contortions and guttural hollers that contrast with her steely, bitter repression in the second act. For the most part, she’s numb and angry, silently yet visibly rattled by the sight of other children and looks of pity from her co-workers. Yet for all of her simmering intensity, the emotional journey she’s depicting remains vague and disjointed. Who is Martha beyond her pain? Her style of performance—suffering writ large on her face and body—is easily commendable. Yet it lacks direction and as such, feels naggingly empty at its core.

This problem extends to the rest of the film. With the help of cinematographer Benjamin Loeb’s camerawork, the big home birth scene successfully conveys the restlessness and chaos of labor. The single-shot approach isn’t gimmicky in this case because it allows us to witness, uninterrupted and from start to finish, what exactly happened that night. We’re given a front-row view, so to speak, and a spot in the jury stand. To see the rapid pace with which events unfold, and the atmosphere of jittery panic, is to understand how difficult it would be to lay blame on any one single moment or decision made. The film’s courtroom finale hence corresponds to the prologue’s intentions, but it’s tonally jarring, the emotional resolution and cheeseball sentimentality arriving out of left field following the flailing, psychodramatic mid-section.

Instead of peeling back the layers of Martha’s trauma, Mundruczó and Wéber pile on outer conflicts to convey angst and hazy agitation. Martha and Sean’s wildly different expressions of grief poison the couple, unearthing class anxieties (he’s a construction worker, she’s a white-collar executive), pent-up resentments, and squabbles with Martha’s family. Perhaps the intention was a broader portrait of how a single tragedy can unravel entire families and relationships, yet no single issue is given much attention. The most egregious detour comes at a family reunion that inevitably explodes into a full-blown spat between Martha and her controlling mother, Elizabeth (Ellen Burstyn), regarding the need for justice. Elizabeth essentially drops the mic by reminding everyone of her hardships as a survivor of the Holocaust. Burstyn commands the screen with her quivering monologue, but the moment feels overwrought and disingenuous. Its randomness is reminiscent of the scene in Tommy Wiseau’s The Room when Lisa’s mother announces “I definitely have breast cancer” mid-conversation, never to return to the topic.

The holiday gathering and its climactic quarrel actually make up one of two acts in Wéber’s original stage play of the same name. (The first act is the birthing scene.) A couple in real life, Wéber and Mundruczó have vaguely alluded to having drawn inspiration from real life—maybe they can imagine the pain of this story after all. But in building the feature-film version around the play’s two dramatic poles, they declined to fill the space between them with anything resembling the nuance of experience. A notorious showboat with a penchant for doubling down on extreme emotions, Mundruczó proves horribly mismatched to material that cries out for a delicate touch. The outcome is a scattered depiction of female grief, one that demands our respect with brooding displays of suffering yet never earns it with any genuine depth.

12 Comments

  • cosmiagramma-av says:

    Let’s also talk about what a cliche-ass title that is.

  • modusoperandi0-av says:

    Pieces Of A Woman is the feel good movie of the year!

  • ajvia-av says:

    “…it also cheapens a woman’s trauma by rendering her pain into a confused dramatic spectacle.”Isn’t that what the entire movie is actually about? Like, the synopsis of the flick is “a woman goes through an awful trauma”, and we watch it. Should it have been a comedy?
    I find it hard to imagine any other way to actually, you know, tell a story of a woman who has a newborn baby die, besides “dramatic spectacle”. But, that’s just me. I wrote MASSACRE ON AISLE 12, and we all know that movie was something of a confused spectacle as well. (If you don’t know, believe me when I say it, and DO NOT GO SEE IT TO FIND OUT FOR YOUSELF, it’s awful and terrible and will ruin your day, which, to be fair, pales in comparison to the 4 years it’s ruined for me since the day it got optioned to make.)

    • jake--gittes-av says:

      “Confused” seems like a key word there, and the negative side of “spectacle” in this context is a lack of nuance and complexity that the rest of the review basically confirms is an issue. No one is saying it should have been a comedy, but recently e.g. Manchester By The Sea demonstrated how you can inject a great deal of authentic everyday levity into a story about unimaginable trauma without cheapening the latter one bit, which does require obvious talent and very sharp judgment, etc. – by comparison, a “dramatic spectacle” that’s all-suffering-all-the-time does come off as an easy way out, and it’s no surprise that it would make the drama less absorbing.

    • dirtside-av says:

      I think the objection was to the fact that it’s done poorly, not that exploring her trauma and grief isn’t a valid topic. The words “confused” and “spectacle” elucidate the complaint.

    • jjjjjjjjack-av says:

      “spectacle” suggests the problem is that the film remains on the surface and doesn’t convey the characters’ inner lives effectively.

  • RiseAndFire-av says:

    Pieces of a Woman, Ranked1. Her mind (please don’t applaud)

  • ohnoray-av says:

    “The single-shot approach isn’t gimmicky”I’m sure this part is well done, but since the movie seems to be riding on selling this scene now, then you can’t help but feel like it’s a little gimmicky (even if that wasn’t its intent).

  • nightriderkyle-av says:

    How many dead babies does it take to win an Oscar?2. One for the movie and one for method acting.

  • nonnoono-av says:

    [Warning: comment filled with spoilers] The opening scene that so many people have gone into a lather about is actually a fairly normal display of the last 30 minutes of a woman’s labor giving birth, how the scene ends is a tragedy, but as the mother eventually realizes, is no one’s fault, and she did experience some moments of joy with her daughter. The slower pace of the rest of the movie is also natural and realistic, as the mother untangles her own experience from those other people want to press upon her.
    I’m a bit stunned by this reviewer’s harsh dissection and the many rather hateful comments showing up here. I thought this movie was well worth my time and is quite the showcase for Vanessa Kirby’s talent. Plus, I loved the happy ending, so there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin