B

Accepted teaches tough lessons about a higher education scandal

Dan Chen's film tracks T.M. Landry College Prep's fall from grace in real time, capturing multiple deceptions

Film Reviews Education
Accepted teaches tough lessons about a higher education scandal
In Accepted, high school seniors in rural Louisiana attend T.M. Landry, an unconventional K-12 school that became famous for sending its graduates to elite universities like Harvard, Yale, and Stanford. Photo: Greenwich Entertainment

The T.M. Landry College Preparatory School of Breaux Bridge, Louisiana, first garnered attention in 2016 with a series of viral videos showing students huddling around a computer and erupting in joy over their college acceptance reveals. As with most viral sensations, the students embarked on a media-blitz tour of local evening newscasts and national daytime talk shows. It was a modern-day Cinderella story: in a community where the average annual household income was $32,000, a school for underprivileged children boasted 100 percent college acceptance, with 32 percent headed to Ivy League institutions.

The documentary Accepted sets out to follow T.M. Landry seniors in the graduating class of 2019 and uncover the school’s secret recipe for success, something akin to a Louisiana-set Try Harder!, the excellent documentary on how overachievers cope with the pressure cooker that is San Francisco’s famed Lowell High School. Michael Landry, who operates T.M. Landry out of a warehouse with his wife Tracey, is shown motivating kids like a sports coach with tough love and rallying cries. The film follows students including Alicia Simon, Adia Sabatier, Isaac Smith, and Cathy Bui as they navigate daunting school days that begin at 8:20 a.m. and conclude at 8 p.m. For the most part, they seem to thrive on the school’s familial vibe. Simon, for instance, who transferred from a predominantly white school, no longer feels isolated.

Then everything unraveled on Nov. 30, 2018, when The New York Times published a 4,770-word exposé on its front page detailing T.M. Landry’s history of abuse and doctored transcripts. Filmmaker Dan Chen and his crew witness the ship going down firsthand. Interviews with students from this point on are conducted in a studio. Curiously, the first half features no such confessionals—and the film is candid about falling for Landry’s media savvy and carefully cultivated image.

Halfway through, for example, it allows Sabatier to lift the curtain, revealing that a scene seen 23 minutes prior was staged without the filmmakers’ knowledge. It involves Landry at home fielding calls at about 11 at night from students with homework questions. Sabatier, one of the callers in that scene, confesses that Landry had instructed students to call him at home in anticipation of the film crew’s presence.

In academia, there’s been ample discussion on performances in documentaries: because the camera is watching, subjects inevitably perform for it whether consciously or unconsciously, validating the maxim that to observe something is to change it. This is a rare moment when filmmakers acknowledge some limits of the documentary form and invite viewers to take everything with a grain of salt. Most documentaries are far less forthcoming, and many of late actively manipulate the audience, such as Roadrunner employing A.I.-generated Anthony Bourdain voiceover and Leave No Trace passing off one of its own producers as a third-party talking head.

Some questions still linger after the end crawl. What prompted whistleblowers to speak out when so much of their future depended on keeping up the charade? In the fiction film The Sweet Hereafter, teenaged Nichole decides to lie on the witness stand about the school bus accident for deeply personal reasons. This is in no way to suggest or imply that any former Landry students were untruthful, but the whistleblowers must have done similar soul searching before sharply steering off their life course when they were so close to crossing a finish line.

Accepted (2022) Movie Trailer

Several months after The Times’ exposé, an even bigger college admissions scandal broke in March 2019, Operation Varsity Blues, which implicated more than 50 well-heeled and connected parents, college coaches, exam administrators and others in the exchange of $15 million for placement at Ivy League schools and other elite institutions. The film shows T.M. Landry students reacting to the news, and commentators, some unattributed, explaining how one wrong (Operation Varsity Blues) begets the other (T.M. Landry). Now knowing the full scope of the systemic inequities they’re up against, do former T.M. Landry students have any regrets? Do they think they may have ended up in better colleges if everyone had just played along? Just as Chen doesn’t sniff out breaking news right under his nose, sometimes he’s not posing the obvious questions. Instead, the film succumbs to a conventional happy ending, with students heading off to HBCUs and state colleges.

Accepted ultimately arrives at a conclusion about the harmfulness of the “model minority” narrative without necessarily deploying the exact term, as it highlights the fact that these inspirational stories about marginalized people pulling themselves up by their bootstraps are often used to allow systemic inequities to fester. It’s a point Try Harder! also makes, but it’s especially compelling when it isn’t applied stereotypically to Asians, who have been caricatured that way. But to see black students framed as a model minority truly cements the damaging nature of the narrative, and the mental and emotional toll it takes on those forced into that box. And touching on these deeper issues without actually pinpointing the ones that need the most attention results in a documentary that ultimately misleads its audience in the same way its subject betrayed the filmmakers.

12 Comments

  • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

    Try Hard Or Die Harder!

  • noreallybutwait-av says:

    It’s weird that this review seems to … kinda come down on the whistleblower students like “Why would they throw their future away?”Because it was objectively the moral thing to do? Because living with the pressure and guilt of knowing you are facilitating a massive falsehood can mentally destroy a person?It’s very odd that this review seems to wonder why the whistleblowers would want to tell the truth. Yes, these students are absolutely up against systemic obstacles, and therefore might see themselves as justified for taking these opportunities, but it’s also just like, weird to assume that’s the path they would take? Like, “why didn’t these guys just keep lying, forever? Isn’t that what everyone would do?”

    • lmh325-av says:

      I work in admissions counseling. I suspect that some of the potential whistleblowers are also struggling with the idea that if everyone is doing it, why should they fall on the sword?Their white counterparts have been doing versions of this for years. Affluent schools massively inflate grades and transcripts. They pour money into services for students and families pay people like me to game the system. I have a family who has paid my company $80,000 to help get her son into a college above what he naturally could have done.If everyone is cheating, why should the most marginalized take the fall? You’re right. It’s the morally right thing to do, but I’m sympathetic to the students.

      • noreallybutwait-av says:

        Absolutely I’m sympathetic to the students dealing with a system that is stacked against them. But I can ALSO see why some students felt an obligation to come clean. I can definitely understand why some didn’t, for the exact reasons you stated, and I completely get that mentality and have sympathy for them. But this article seems completely flummoxed as to why anyone WOULDN’T feel that way, and like, surely it’s obvious to see why at least some of the students would feel guilt or emotional distress about perpetuating the lie.

      • bcfred2-av says:

        Not to mention everyone wanted this to be a success story. Conservatives want to point to what can happen when kids are given options and liberals want to see low-income minorities succeed on a heads-up basis. What’s sad is they were clearly learning enough to gain admission to colleges that would have been beyond their grasp without attending Landry, without being party to this fraud.

    • dr-boots-list-av says:

      From the NYT article on the case:
      The Landrys also fostered a culture of fear with physical and emotional abuse, students and teachers said. Students were forced to kneel on rice, rocks and hot pavement, and were choked, yelled at and berated.

      Seems like abuse and intimidation might be important parts of the answer to why students didn’t talk.

    • triohead-av says:

      “Now knowing the full scope of the systemic inequities they’re up against, do former T.M. Landry students have any regrets? Do they think they may have ended up in better colleges if everyone had just played along? Just as Chen doesn’t sniff out breaking news right under his nose, sometimes he’s not posing the obvious questions.”The review isn’t posing these questions to the whistleblowers, but wondering why the film/filmmakers don’t ask their subjects why they wanted to tell the truth, what was going through their head, etc…
      Which is fair in a review. There’s a big twist that occurs during filming, it’s also framed within the final film as a narrative twist, but little to no reflection on where that came from or how people lived with the choice.

    • raisinmuffin-av says:

      You quite predictably failed at “it’s the objectively moral thing to do.” Objectivity and morality each have no business with the other. 

  • Fleur-de-lit-av says:

    Disappointed that this isn’t about Accepted, the Justin Long vehicle featuring a young Jonah Hill.  Also Blake Lively is there.

    • kim-porter-av says:

      The short summary on Fandango when you try to buy tickets to the documentary is the one of this film. If that helps.

  • sarcastro7-av says:

    God, it’s getting annoying at how every facet of our culture is increasingly composed of pure grift and fraud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin