D

Children Of The Corn review: Stephen King’s classic short story still sucks as a movie

Hollywood's 11th attempt at this tale of a possessed child who leads a bloody rampage is no better than the first ten

Film Reviews Stephen King
Children Of The Corn review: Stephen King’s classic short story still sucks as a movie
Children Of The Corn Image: RLJE Films

Children Of The Corn is quite possibly the best horror concept to never make a great movie, even after a whopping 11 tries. And yes, for those keeping count, that includes the new remake, which is the second start-from-scratch effort in the series. Small “sundown” towns run by small-minded people have long been terrifying in real life to anyone deemed an outsider; making such people the smallest of all, i.e. children, is a terrifying inversion of norms and something of a social satire move. Yet the original Star Trek episodes “Miri” and “And The Children Shall Lead,” both of which seemingly inspired a young Stephen King when he wrote the short story, did it better than any of these, er, corny franchise entries have managed.

Part of the problem that sinks every filmed version of this story is fundamentally misunderstanding what’s scary about literalist religious cults. George Goldsmith, who scripted the 1984 original film, later claimed he intended it as a metaphor for the Iranian Revolution. Here’s the problem: religion inherently depends on faith and non-falsifiable claims, but the Children Of The Corn movies always make it indisputably clear that the evil deity “He Who Walks Behind the Rows” is real, and often corporeal. Zealous faith should be the real monster, but horror movies feel the need to have an actual monster, which inevitably, paradoxically, makes the titular children much less scary by comparison.

The new Children Of The Corn is set in contemporary times, so it’s not quite a prequel, but it picks up the story earlier than most. Director Kurt Wimmer, whose Equilibrium and Ultraviolet suggested a more fun and competent helming hand than what’s on display here, adds a couple of timely updates. First, the corn has been genetically modified by the totally-not-Monsanto company GrowSynth, giving the whole story a bit of an atomic-age, cautionary-tale edge. Second, for modern shortened attention spans, the monster is now simply called “He Who Walks.”

In an extremely convoluted setup, a teenage boy who’s been out in the cornfield for days goes on a rampage, killing all the adults at a foster home. The town sheriff tries to subdue the kid using a cattle sedative, and winds up accidentally poisoning all the children inside. “There goes my reelection,” he matter-of-factly exclaims. But the killer kid’s younger sister Eden (Kate Moyer) remembers, biding her time in the foster care of the town pastor, played by Bruce Spence, here adding Children Of The Corn to his resume of cinematic franchises that includes Mad Max, Star Wars, The Matrix, and The Lord Of The Rings.

Meanwhile, everyone in the town is angry all the time, since their crops basically died after they went all-in on genetically modified seeds and the farmers want a newer government subsidy program that will pay them not to grow corn. The kids, who have come to believe in “He Who Walks,” disagree, to put it mildly. Eden, who has become obsessed with the character of the Red Queen from Lewis Carroll’s Alice books, starts painting the cornstalks red. “The Red Queen makes the world the way she wants it to be,” declares Eden, who clearly hasn’t actually read Through the Looking Glass.

CHILDREN OF THE CORN (2023) Official Red Band Trailer

There’s no reason a movie with this premise couldn’t be better. Just not in these folks’ hands. Wimmer’s script feels like half-jotted ideas, with characters speaking in paragraphs of exposition and theme rather than actual dialogue. Moyer manages to mostly make it work, coming across as a genuinely bad person rather than the usual creepy, possessed demon kid. But when she turns to the camera with quips like, “He’s not laughing now,” we have to wonder: who is she talking to?

Mostly CG-cartoonish explosions and gore effects are cut around judiciously or utilized for jump scares that are so quick you have no time to see the seams. The big final twist is laugh-out-loud loony and obviously animated, so if you must see the film, at least stick around for that. Otherwise, maybe the 12th attempt to adapt Stephen King’s classic tale will be the charm.

(Children Of The Corn opens in theaters on March 3 followed by a digital release on March 21)

10 Comments

  • teageegeepea-av says:

    This film had its theatrical debut in October 2020. It appears there’s a reason it took so long since then to have a wide release.

  • vroom-socko-av says:

    The first one wasn’t bad, but 11 films?? what the everloving fuck? And Kurt, so much potential.

  • TigerStylez-av says:

    not that I think this movie is worth a damn, but you seem to be forgetting that in the novella, He Who Walks Behind the Rows was most certainly real, there was no ambiguity about it.

  • leobot-av says:

    Horror can require an especially skillful hand, when it’s not confronting you directly with a slasher or monster or virus. But I mean, come on. If you’re not confident you’re going to turn out an amazing remake or reboot, and the franchise isn’t a historically profitable one—I mean, what’s the point or the motivation?I guess King doesn’t mind all these latest disappointments, but personally I’d be irate that people keep turning my sourcework into, at best, boring balderdash.Having said that, I’m still hoping someone takes a go at Rose Madder.

    • frasier-crane-av says:

      “what’s the point or the motivation?”As someone whose earliest IMDB credit is “Children of the Corn V”, I’ll field that one: Money.These films, even the shittiest of them, are very popular, and rented and sold a ton of copies. Our company was paid very well to crank out a few of them, and they performed. We were proud of the business, not the art.

      • dannykaiser-av says:

        Did you notice the third logo at the start of the trailer? Digital Domain, isn’t that James Cameron’s FX house?  

  • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

    “declares Eden, who clearly hasn’t actually read Through the Looking Glass.”She should comment on these threads!

  • kinjacaffeinespider-av says:

    Is there any danger of people confusing He Who Walks with Randall Flagg, The Walkin’ Dude?

    • toasterny-av says:

      That probably wasn’t the original intention of King, but I would guess he would allow speculation about that possibility. 

  • noturtles-av says:

    Anyone who hires the director of “Ultraviolet” to direct another movie deserves to lose a bunch of money.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin