C+

Felicity Jones and Eddie Redmayne are Aeronauts who soar in a hot-air balloon but bore on land

Film Reviews moviereview
Felicity Jones and Eddie Redmayne are Aeronauts who soar in a hot-air balloon but bore on land

Photo: Amazon Studios

The Aeronauts is a movie about a lofty and dangerous hot-air balloon ride, and it takes a while to realize just how short this epic adventure is going to be. Early in the 1862-set film, weather scientist James Glaisher (Eddie Redmayne) is preparing his balloon for departure as a large crowd watches expectantly—and his pilot, Amelia Wren (Felicity Jones), arrives to even more fanfare, riding the roof of a carriage, wearing a colorful dress, and leaping into a series of cartwheels. Amelia insists that they take off with a flourish of fireworks, a surprise airborne mutt, and other assorted gimmicks. It feels like they’re about to launch into space, and when they do slip the surly bonds of Earth, the crowd goes wild. Despite the fond farewell, the pair haven’t even packed an overnight bag. When the craft returns to terra firma—no spoiler to say that what goes up does eventually come back down—fewer than two hours have elapsed.

The movie is also over and out in well under 120 minutes, but, disappointingly, its mission is not depicted in real time. Director Tom Harper, who also conceived the story with screenwriter Jack Thorne, feels obligated to circle back and explain what motivates the characters to get into a hot-air balloon, intercutting origin stories with aerial action. Glaisher firmly believes that measuring certain data in the sky might aid in the study of weather patterns, to much scoffing from the rest of the scientific community (including a speech scene where the casting call must have specified that professional scoffing would be required). Wren is more compelling. She’s essentially the hotshot haunted by a past tragedy, and Jones imbues those familiar notes with no-nonsense charm, enhanced by the fact that this part is not often filled by a woman.

Jones’ character in particular is a product of the historical-fiction-level liberties taken with the movie’s real-life source material. The balloon trip itself is a composite of several such fact-finding missions, and while James Glaisher was a real scientist, Amelia Wren is fabricated, supposedly “inspired” by French aeronaut Sophie Blanchard. It’s easy to imagine someone somewhere taking umbrage at this fancifully loose interpretation of hot-air ballooning history, but it’s considerably harder to picture anyone clamoring for more Glaisher at the expense of Wren, whose daring and showmanship masks her levelheaded pragmatism. Characterizing what Redmayne and Jones share here as “chemistry” would be an oversell, but there’s a dorky romance (however unconsummated) to their scenic bickering.

It might seem like a silly lark, the Oscar-nominated Theory Of Everything stars reuniting for a movie about a vastly less-famous scientist tooling around in a weather balloon. But the further afield Aeronauts strays from biopic respectability and the swelling of an inspirational score, the more entertaining it is. There’s a lifeboat-like intimacy to the setting, for which Harper alternates clear (and surprisingly convincing) skyscapes and closer, more shallow focus as the altitude climbs and the temperature drops. Late in the film, Jones gets a sensational, terrifyingly convincing set piece where she must ascend the side of the balloon in sub-optimal circumstances. On the whole, The Aeronauts is a pretty good small-scale adventure movie.

It’s also a pretty dull everything-else, the unceasing flashbacks providing multiple instances where telling might have been preferable to showing. Restricting backstory to what Glaisher and Wren discuss in the balloon’s basket could have been hoary, but at least it would reduce the odds of other characters saying things like, “You can’t just fly away from your problems!” Once in a while, the cuts out of the balloon and into a tedious TV movie work on a basic, suspense-goosing level, providing little commercial-style act breaks. Most of the time, they’re an accidental throwback to a more innocent time, when audiences wouldn’t think wistfully of checking their phones during the dull bits.

7 Comments

  • dirtside-av says:

    This sounds like it would be a fantastic movie to watch while super high, pun intended.

    • majorwedgie-av says:

      Or, as my daughter said, “Too bad they didn’t smoke a blunt. Then they would’ve been the highest people while they were the highest people.” DOnt watch this high if you’re freaked out by heights, though – my vertigo kicked in several times and I was stone cold sober.

  • pinkiefisticuffs-av says:

    I showed the balloon-climbing picture above to Mrs. Fisticuffs, and then pointed out the clouds swirling far below.  Her response:  “Fuck that”.  

  • sbt1-av says:

    The Splendiferous Hot Air Balloon Escapades of Edicity H. Redones?

    • donggoo-av says:

      Seems like a good dinner-and-a-movie date pairing with Professor P. J. Cornucopia’s Fantastic Foodmagorium and Great American Steakery

  • ruefulcountenance-av says:

    The balloon sequences, for better or ill, feel more like a fantasy film than anything with pretensions of historical drama. I must say, I’m yet to get Eddie Redmayne. His performances always seem like an aggregate of quirks and tics.

  • tommarkel-av says:

    Good movie and great 2 leads until you check the rewriting of thistory that was done.  It is 50%+ BS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin