B

Parisian cop drama Les Misérables speaks the same righteous language as Victor Hugo

Film Reviews moviereview
Parisian cop drama Les Misérables speaks the same righteous language as Victor Hugo
Photo: Amazon Studios

No one mounts a barricade in this Les Misérables, the debut feature from French documentarian Ladj Ly. Nor does anyone steal a loaf of bread or break a windowpane. Yet Ly’s immersive film, a crime drama that evokes both the unrelenting energy of Training Day and the empathetic investigative spirit of David Simon’s The Wire, shares more than a location and a revolutionary spirit with Victor Hugo’s novel. Like Hugo, Ly—who also shares a screenwriting credit on the film—picks up his tools and uses them to chip away not at the moral failings of his characters, but at the world that made them who they are. Jean Valjean broke the law to feed a child, and that act defined the rest of his life; centuries later, the people of the Parisian suburb Montfermeil find themselves, like Hugo’s famous protagonist, left only with bad options. And like Valjean, they too discover that it’s all made worse by cops.

Set in the Paris-adjacent neighborhood that several of Hugo’s characters (and Ly himself) call home and inspired by the 2005 riots in Paris, Les Misérables follows Stéphane Ruiz (Damien Bonnard of Staying Vertical), a policeman newly arrived in the city from a much sleepier area. He’s thrown in with two longtime partners working turf they know intimately: Chris (Alexis Manenti), openly racist and prone to violence, and Gwada (Djebril Zonga), quiet but keyed up. There are shady deals and uneasy truces, back-scratching and macho posturing. As they chat up and stare down the residents of a community they also call home, it becomes ever more apparent—to Ruiz and the audience alike—that they are in no way in charge. When an altercation with a group of kids suspected of stealing a lion cub from a nearby circus goes horribly wrong—a situation far more fraught and nightmarish than it sounds—the lie of the cops’ authority finally fully dissipates, and many boiling pots begin to bubble over at once.

It’s a chaotic moment that begets further chaos, shifting the power dynamics in a way that can be difficult to track—sometimes effectively, sometimes less so. But the potency of the film’s back half is undeniable. The last act is among the most anxiety-inducing sequences in film in the last year, no small feat for a time period that includes both Her Smell and Uncut Gems. Ly, cinematographer Julien Poupard, and editor Flora Volpelière are merciless, allowing the camera to move with a fluidity its subjects are never granted, save one (Issa Perica, a real find, as the Gavroche figure of the film). Both Perica and the film move with a kind of skulking grace, which somehow makes the chaos all the more overwhelming.

Ly’s understanding of his home turf proves an invaluable asset, allowing him to imbue the film with a potent sense of place. There’s tension in the early going, but it’s one of inevitability. We know bad things are coming, because watching the tension slowly rise both within the community and in the individuals we encounter makes it clear that no other end is possible. These encounters are rich in detail: In one scene, the cops meet Owl, an ex-con now out hustling for work in a button-down shirt and sport coat. As Owl turns to walk away, we see sweat stains have spread across his back like a second pair of lungs. A screwdriver opens a gate; kids sit and discuss inevitable injuries and burning bodies; a drone hovers, a sound that becomes increasingly familiar and significant. The film meanders, then leaps and snarls like a dog in a thunderstorm.

Like Simon, Ly and his fellow screenwriters condemn bad actors, but come down hardest on the broken systems and corrupt institutions that created them. Glimpses of the quiet home lives of all three officers don’t serve so much to humanize them as to point out that decent people can become monsters when given power and little oversight. The film balances its final moments on a blade made sharp by injustice and corruption, before returning at last to a quote from Victor Hugo that brings the point home. It’s not subtle, and it’s not pleasant. It’s angry, and it’s honest. Hugo would approve.

9 Comments

  • augustintrebuchon-av says:

    Given that this movie is my 2nd personal best of 2019 (after Parasite), I just had to go and read the article to see what you could have missed for it to gather a mere B.Turns out, something quite big:Glimpses of the quiet home lives of all three officers don’t serve so much to humanize them as to point out that decent people can become monsters when given power and little oversight.Their home lives are nothing but quiet, where on Earth did you get that impression? One is divorced and away from his kids; the other lives with his mother and doesn’t have any life to speak of; and the last goes home to screaming kids and a very possibly (and understandably) desperate housewife.As Ly made very abundantly clear, in every interview, no-one in this film is wholly innocent, but no-one equally is wholly guilty. Cops and other inhabitants of those dreadful projects are all in it together, and if some have badges and others don’t, they all share the same hell.

    • tap-dancin-av says:

      Fuck cops – all of them, anywhere. They choose to go into those hells and make them more hellish.

      • ajvia-av says:

        yeah, thats a really well fleshed out concept and idea.Thanks for sharing your incredibly succinct beliefs and thoughts w/ us. you’re the arbiter of decency and morality, who rages against those that help us have law and order in our society. Great gag! If you used the eyes you have (I hope) and the brain you were born with (likely) you’d consider that no group of people is without fault and no group of people is perfect. Any profession- cops, doctors, politicians, burger flippers, whatever amazing job you have- has a bad apple in there. Some more than others, based on the type of work (who goes out and says “I want to be in charge of the world!”?) but its very disingenuous to say “F—- all of them” and think you are somehow going to sound anything less than deluded and idiotic.Also, I’m not even a big fan of the Po-Po, but I dislike ignorant mindless fools a litttttle bit more.

      • redvioletblack-av says:

        You’re absolutely right, but I do think it’s relevant that cops, and other boot-lickers, aren’t benefiting much, either.

        • tap-dancin-av says:

          I can’t disagree with that. I believe that they are miserable people and, quite possibly, hate themselves. Substance abuse and domestic abuse are rampant in the ranks. Sometimes I want to pity them. Instead I’ll save my compassion for the people that they hurt and humiliate on the daily.

          • redvioletblack-av says:

            I don’t think the film suggests they deserve sympathy. It’s worth watching.

      • witheringcrossfire-av says:

        Please grow up and actually attempt to understand the world 

    • mofro2224-av says:

      Well, for what its worth this is still probably a better review than I would have gave it. It didn’t even land in my top 25 of last year.Still dissapointed France submitted this over Portrait of a Lady on Fire for best internationl Oscar nom.

  • kevinj68-av says:

    I’m surprised that you didn’t make any mention of “La Haine” (1995). The two films seem to have a lot in common. How do they compare?  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin