Taiwanese gorefest The Sadness rips the guts out of COVID discourse

Plus, a LGBTQ+ horror story heading to Shudder in our third dispatch from the Fantasia Film Festival

Film Features Sadness
Taiwanese gorefest The Sadness rips the guts out of COVID discourse

Photo: October Coast Films

They’re coming to get you: an army of COVID movies, swarming film festivals with the unstoppable momentum of a legion of the undead. Movies made during the 2020 quarantine have a few key tells. Are the actors separated by screens, as in Natalie Morales’ Language Lessons? Or are they outside and six feet apart from one another, like in Zoe Lister-Jones’ How It Ends? And those are just the movies that decline to mention the state of the world. As I noted back in March, SXSW was full of films that used the pandemic as a plot point. To be honest, most of them sounded like a drag.

Compared to that festival, this year’s Fantasia has been light on pandemic-themed content—and better off for it. So it was a surprise to click on a screener of director Rob Jabbaz’s buzzy, ultraviolent Taiwanese horror film The Sadness and be greeted within the first five minutes by a scene of a harried doctor begging a YouTube host not to politicize a virus, only to be dismissed with a huffy, “It’s no worse than a case of the flu.” The Sadness doesn’t feel like a “COVID movie.” That may be because, according to Jabbaz, at the time they were filming “the spread of the virus actually wasn’t really a big concern in Taiwan.” Or it could just be that any political commentary is overshadowed by the tidal wave of depravity and gore that follows.

The (sick) joke of The Sadness is that this innocuous, flu-like virus spontaneously mutates into something akin to airborne rabies, turning everyone who catches it into a “homicidal sadistic monster” driven by bloodlust and base instinct. It’s easy to ignore a pandemic when its symptoms are relatively mild. But if it’s leading to geysers of blood soaking commuters and piles of disemboweled bodies lining the sidewalks… well, you have to admit the virus is real then, don’t you?

The plot is simple, opening on attractive young couple Kat (Regina) and Jim (Berant Zhu) as they go through their morning routine on what appears to be an ordinary day. Then an old woman with blood-red eyes wanders into Jim’s regular breakfast spot, pours boiling fryer oil over the cashier’s head, and we’re off to the races. The sheer volume of blood and guts in this film—one scene sees a man having a bone saw plunged into his abdomen, screaming as he’s splattered with chunks of his own internal organs—cannot be overstated.

The Sadness isn’t technically a zombie movie. The infected retain the ability to talk, think, and reason. They kill and rape and gouge out strangers’ eyeballs with their thumbs simply because they feel an overwhelming compulsion to do so. And that makes it even scarier, because that implies that the the guy sitting across from you on the subway is but a brain injury away from turning into Bill Paxton in Near Dark.

Combined with the pervasive threat of sexual violence, the sheer intensity and volume of splatter makes The Sadness a film that’s strictly for the gorehound set. Compared to the infamous Hong Kong Category III movies to which it’s paying tribute, however, it’s relatively digestible, and the practical makeup effects from local team IF SFX Art Maker are impressively gnarly. Jabbaz shows a flair for satire as well, painting doctors, politicians, the internet, and human beings in general with a mischievous yet cruel brush. If there’s a moment of respite in The Sadness, you can bet it won’t last for very long.

One of the film’s more disturbing characters is known only as “The Businessman” (Tsu-Chiang Wang), a middle-aged man who harasses Kat on the train, goes into a rant about political correctness when she politely brushes him off, and promptly transforms into a slobbering, red-eyed maniac. His hatred of women no longer subtext, he’s the type of character that makes audiences cheer when he finally gets what’s coming to him. The Sadness flopped at the box office when it was released in Taiwan back in January (too soon, perhaps?), but it’s exactly the kind of film could have the right audience swinging from the proverbial rafters at a midnight screening.

There’s no threat of anyone climbing the walls at a screening of The Last Thing Mary Saw, which was picked up by Shudder shortly before its world premiere at Fantasia. Director Edoardo Vitaletti makes his feature debut withthis subdued horror-drama set in 1840s New York, opening on an image of a young woman, hands tied behind her back and a bloody bandage covering her eyes, sitting in front of a tribunal of somber, black-clad men who command her to recite the Lord’s Prayer. She does, and the two guards standing on either side of the judges’ bench lower their rifles. How did pious farm girl Mary (Stefanie Scot) find herself in this predicament?

As we find out, it’s because she’s in love with her family’s maid, Eleanor (Isabelle Fuhrman, the titular Orphan, now 24 and working in indies like this one). With the help of a farmhand who serves as a lookout during their nightly rendezvous, the girls have been carrying on a clandestine affair for quite some time. But Mary comes from the type of stiff-backed Calvinists who consider enjoying your food to be sinfully decadent. So once Mary’s grandmother (Judith Roberts) begins to suspect the girls are up to something “unnatural,” a bleak ending to this particular tale is all but assured.

Pairing a period setting and light supernatural elements with themes of religion as a tool of subjugation, writer-director Edoardo Vitaletti courts comparisons to Robert Eggers’ game-changing The Witch. (In its story of two women falling in love and being persecuted by their small, religious community, it also superficially, coincidentally recalls the closing entry in this summer’s Fear Street trilogy.) But Vitaletti’s film doesn’t have as much to say as Eggers’ did, and it falls short in terms of imagining a path to liberation for these doomed lovers. Considering its opening scene, it’s not a spoiler to say that things do not turn out well for young Mary. A sense of predestination burdens this already slow film, turning it into a well-crafted, atmospheric death march. At least Thomasin had the option of selling her soul to the Devil.

As different as they otherwise are, The Sadness and The Last Thing Mary Saw share a pessimistic worldview. Neither have much faith in humanity, and although they prioritize different things—outrageous gore in The Sadness, haunting atmosphere in The Last Thing Mary Saw—both derive their horror from a growing certainty that everything will not, in fact, be all right in the end. It’s a feeling that has sat in the pit of many stomachs over the past 18 months, and horror movies, at their best, provide us with a way of emotionally processing the things that scare us in real life. In this case, it’s a matter of whether you prefer your catharsis hot or cold.


We’ve got one more dispatch on the way from the Fantasia Film Festival, closing out this three-week affair with a new film from the prolific Takashi Miike and a lifelong passion project from legendary VFX artist Phil Tippett.

14 Comments

  • asynonymous3-av says:

    Any idea where these might be streaming at? The Sadness looks right up my alley!

  • atlasstudios-av says:

    ok so the sadness is taiwanese crossed, sounds cool

    • taumpytearrs-av says:

      Just what I was going to say!

      • cura-te-ipsum-av says:

        And me!I’d really like to recommend Crossed: Wish You Were Here while we’re … here.Crossed: Wish You Were Here was a free webcomic ostensibly for promoting the other comics but kind of backfired by actually having a long running story with well-formed characters and a complex well written plot as well as not using gore gratuitously (even the initial outbreak in London was at least in service of the story) while most of the rest of the multiple Crossed series you were supposed to buy degenerated into excessive torture porn sooner or later – usually sooner. They also weren’t as good and often terrible.

    • mrdalliard123-av says:

      Yeesh. I couldn’t get through Crossed, so I doubt I’d like this. Even my husband, who isn’t squeamish when it comes to horror, couldn’t get into it because of how gratuitous it was.

  • teageegeepea-av says:

    We have court records from Plymouth Colony concerning what they regarded as improper sexual behavior:http://www.histarch.illinois.edu/plymouth/Lauria1.html
    There’s only one entry involving an interaction just between two women, but it’s “lascivious carriage” suggestive of a forbidden act rather than such an act itself, so the woman on trial just had to make a public acknowledgement of her unchaste behavior and receive a warning.The pattern of punishments for male but not female homosexual behavior is consistent with the view that authorities had a male-centric view in which sex wasn’t really possible without them, and anything else basically didn’t count. In 1974 there was an attempt in United States v. Cozart to strike down the law in DC prohibiting the solicitation of sodomy on the grounds it was discriminatory due to only being applied against men (there were no records of any arrests of women), but it was upheld on the grounds that the law theoretically applied to both and the police just weren’t aware of any cases involving women. The current vogue for lesbian period dramas seems a sort of echo of this tendency to find one form of homosexuality more acceptable than another.

    • meinstroopwafel-av says:

      Yeah, the lesbian period film genre is so saturated that Saturday Night Live is making jokes about it, and none of them are particularly good at actually demonstrating what it was like to be LGBT in those eras.*

      I think people are so used to treating history as a continual progression from “bad” to “good” (or at least “better”) they don’t really understand that it’s really not a straight line. Attitudes towards sex and gender have varied dramatically depending on the time and place, even in western culture.*In general a lot of historical fiction fails at getting you into the mindset of people from those times, and while I understand why (both ignorance, and the desire to have recognizable heroes and villains for a modern audience) it doesn’t really do people favors in helping us understand our past and thus our present.

      • teageegeepea-av says:

        I was thinking about that sort of presentism affecting theories of sexuality when I read this claim (from an academic, rather than an entertainer not expected to know anything) that gender inequality is the reason bisexuality is more common among women.

    • delete999999-av says:

      Given that there aren’t that many queer films and period pieces in general, there’s plenty of period pieces with male gay leads. They’re just more stylistically distinct than the very recent glut of achingly longing lesbian ones. 

      • teageegeepea-av says:

        It seems incongruous to go from “there aren’t that many” to “there’s plenty”. Do you mean as a proportion? And I would disagree there aren’t that many period pieces. A number of British actors have complained that so much made over there is period pieces that they work in America to do something contemporary. And even here the Academy Awards heavily consist of period pieces (things are admittedly changing now that Weinstein isn’t throwing his weight around so much).

  • meinstroopwafel-av says:

    I’m confused why the setting is the 1840s, given that the tribunal aspect and the costumes look like they’re from 200 years earlier.

    • umbrielx-av says:

      I think a rural, devoutly religious community then could easily be as “out-of-style” as the Amish look to us today. Though naturally that can lead the audience into a sort of The Village-style “We’re in olden times… but not maybe not that much” dissonance.

  • necgray-av says:

    Does it *matter* if a movie has something “to say”? I don’t recall this being a big part of your usual reviews, Katie. Thematic resonance is *fine*. It can be an enhancement to good material. But it is not, itself, a marker of quality.What you say here might be correct generally but it’s phrased as a criticism and I don’t think that’s fair. (I also don’t know that I agree about the amount of subtext in The Witch but I am tired forever of debating that movie with people.)

  • gargsy-av says:

    “because that implies that the the guy sitting across from you on the subway is but a brain injury away from turning into Bill Paxton in Near Dark. 

    Except that it’s not a vampire movie.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share Tweet Submit Pin