Stephen Colbert—like all of us here at the A.V. Club—are fully aware that the Biden administration has its hands full, and that the resounding defeat of [redacted] and his Republican guard only means we’ve got that much more work to do. But, as evidenced by last night’s post-Inauguration Late Show and our post-Inauguration manifesto, both Colbert and the A.V. Club are sick of ceding so much brain space on the attention-hogging villainy of said redacted person. Colbert actually seemed a little shagged out on Thursday’s show, his voice a bit raspy with, one can only hope, a nice, cathartic bout of bourbon-flavored whooping. Still, it helps to have a very funny filmed piece to throw to, as Colbert did in introducing a meticulously produced trailer for his proposed new period streaming series based on a classic toy.
No, not The Queen’s Gambit, although (if aficionados will pardon us for calling chess a toy) Colbert did admit to taking inspiration from the runaway success of that particular pastime-based Netflix series. Instead, Colbert hopped over to that other, slightly newer, undeniably more colorful, equally frustrating logical nightmare-pursuit, the Rubik’s Cube, introducing his own, sure-to-inspire-sales cash-in, Turn The Left Bottom Middle Sideways Toward The Front-Facing Part. (“It’s not like chess—we don’t get to have cool names for things,” admits the show’s stern but dedicated cube-master.)
Maybe not, but the piece turns (sorry) on the attention to detail, from the pitch-perfect casting of longtime Late Show and Conan O’Brien all-star side-man Brian Stack as the coach, and a fantastic Anya Taylor-Joy lookalike (Holly Hinchliffe) as the series’ cube-solving prodigy. And, like Taylor-Joy’s Beth, Turn The Left Bottom Middle Sideways Toward The Front-Facing Part’s protagonist finds her path to totally-existent Rubik’s Cube stardom a three-dimensional puzzle of obstacles, from wrist strain, to sexism, to that bout of temporary color-blindness. “Oh, also drugs,” our heroine admits in passing, “I do tons of drugs.” (She really does.)
As Colbert introduces his can’t-miss cash-grab, “It mixes elements of The Queen’s Gambit—with a strong desire to make a lot of money on the popularity of The Queen’s Gambit.” He also mentions the fact that there is actually a Rubik’s Cube movie happening (no really), and possibly even a cubist game show, where, undoubtedly, just peeling off the stickers and calling it solved is not an option. (He did not bring up the 1983 animated Rubik’s series, because those creators did not have the vision to peg their corporate-sponsored spinoff to a prestige TV phenomenon.) Plus, as Colbert assures all the “cubeheads” out there, Turn The Left Bottom Middle Sideways Toward The Front-Facing Part is fourteen, brain-scrambling episodes, and will air exclusively on a powerhouse streaming service that in no way will fizzle out faster than a young child’s enthusiasm over the gift of a Rubik’s Cube.
11 Comments
Colbert actually seemed a little shagged out on Thursday’s showI like the fellow, but feel uncomfortable speculating about his sex life as you apparently have no problem with.
I bet the dude lays pipe like a plumber on meth.
He’s down to three times a day. Morning, noon and night.
Haphazardly and constantly complaining about the spiders interfering?
Not to ruin the joke but the 40 minute long doc on Netflix called The Speed Cubers is basically this and its really excellent.
Interesting, but where can this go? Exciting twists and turns, lots of colours, eventually you have 6 flat sides with uniform colours. Everything in order, the universe has righted itself again, no blue green red colour combinations.
In all the folly of human history, a child’s toy isn’t going to surprise me.
I mean, if you want you can go and do Rubiks Cube 2, but today I’m not sure I’d be your target demographic. i’m truly sorry for that.
There was that other Rubik’s thing, the name of which I’m blanking on and it’s annoying the shit out of me. Not the Snake— though that was cool— the flat sheet made up of square panels and cords that allowed the panels to flip around each other at the edges…This is gonna bother me the entire day, I can tell.edit: Magic! Rubik’s Magic. It had 3 separate rings printed on it, and solving it linked all the rings together. Whew.
woo like those puzzle games where you needed to take the ring off but it was impossible to do. I liked these ones better than the cube, more tactile and interesting:
Time is a flat cube.
I made this joke to my girlfriend 3 weeks ago. Give me a job on your writing staff, Colbert!
Turn The Left Bottom Middle Sideways Toward The Front-Facing Part. (“It’s not like chess—we don’t get to have cool names for things,” admits the show’s stern but dedicated cube-master.)
This is where the bit lost me. There is terminology/notation to describe this. I learned this because my niece had a Rubik’s cube lying around and I decided to look up the solution to solve it the intended way.